Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-04-2011, 05:16 PM | #471 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 314
|
Quote:
Old Testament prophecies interpreted as Messianic are associated with Jesus Christ in the New Testament as the awaited Messiah. Not sure what point you're trying to make either. |
|||
10-04-2011, 05:24 PM | #472 | |||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
I like how HJers play WORD GAMES. But, you are NOT even correct. You PRESENT propaganda, RUMORS or Chinese Whispers In the Ghost stories of gMatthew and gMark, the Jews did NOT not even know that a Messiah was among them. Please, Just GO and read the BIBLE and you will see that you DON'T know what you are talking about. You need to get EDUCATED about NT Jesus. On the day Jesus was BAPTIZED in gMark and gMatthew Jesus was UNKNOWN as a Messiah. King Herod BELIEVED he had ALREADY KILLED the Messiah when he was a Child. Please See gMatthew It was PETER who FIRST TOLD Jesus himself that he was the Messiah and IMMEDIATELY Jesus PROHIBITED the disciples from repeating the claims of Peter. Mark 8:27-30[ - Quote:
We KNOW that in the earliest Canonized Ghost stories that it was ANOTHER PERSON who was PUBLICLY called the MESSIAH. Mark 9.38 Quote:
Jesus was NOT even known as the Messiah to the JEWS, it was ANOTHER person who PUBLICLY called himself the Messiah in the earliest Canonised Ghost stories. |
|||
10-04-2011, 05:29 PM | #473 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 314
|
Quote:
Maybe I am wrong, but so far the evidence says otherwise. |
|
10-04-2011, 05:56 PM | #474 | ||||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
You fail to show the evidence for your claim. I will SHOW you what the WRITTEN EVIDENCE says. Mark 8 Quote:
We KNOW that in the earliest Canonized Ghost stories that it was ANOTHER PERSON who was PUBLICLY called the MESSIAH. Mark 9.38 Quote:
You have NOTHING and NOW have began to EMPLOY erroneous information that is NOT even in the very EARLIEST Ghost stories. Matthewt 16:20 - Quote:
|
||||
10-04-2011, 06:11 PM | #475 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
Quote:
There are currently eight known 11th to 15th century manuscripts of a Greek translation from a lost Hebrew or Aramaic original, probably dating from the 1st or 2nd century BCE. However, though now a collection, they were originally separate, written by different people in different periods. Quote:
This is pre-christian, and represents what "anointed" essentially means - to be dedicated to a task by a higher authority (God in this case). DCH |
||
10-04-2011, 07:00 PM | #476 | ||||
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: middle east
Posts: 829
|
Quote:
You are uncertain "what point" I seek to make? Shall we look at what prompted my reply to you? Quote:
You insulted me, and claimed in utter nonsense, "all earliest sources" describe Jesus of Nazareth as the "Messiah". I am waiting for your reference documenting this absurd allegation. Oh, by the way: The Messiah DOES NOT EQUAL the Annointed. I am a bit astonished that you do not know this..... Quote:
I see. lost, eh? ok. Meantime, may I stick with what is not lost? I am disinclined to regard non-existent evidence as particularly useful. If you wish to defend MCalavara and Archibald, may I humbly suggest that you search for some actual data from the Gospel of Mark, supporting their notion that Mark describes Jesus as the Messiah? Quote:
No way you get "messiah" from χριστοῦ "cristou". Absolutely not. Cristou means "annointed", NOT messiah. If you believe that I am wrong, please give me a reference from a Greek language source, (not "Wikipedia") confirming that the two Hebrew words corresponding to "messiah" and "annointed" are BOTH REPRESENTED in the Greek language, by the same single word: χριστοῦ |
||||
10-04-2011, 07:06 PM | #477 | |||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
Ohhh-kay. Chip on the shoulder. Bye.
Quote:
|
|||||
10-04-2011, 07:07 PM | #478 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Quote:
If the latter, then the "C_T" may refer to "Christos" or to "Chrestos". Quote:
|
||
10-04-2011, 09:12 PM | #479 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 314
|
Quote:
The Messiah literally means the Anointed One. And you ignored the argument I made about OT Messianic prophecies being applied to Jesus. If you feel insulted, too bad. You're just wrong and that view of yours can't be taken seriously at all by any experts in the field. You don't believe, go argue with a serious scholar then. And plus, your style is similar to that of a Jehovah's Witness and such. Twisting the meanings of words in Greek or Hebrew to serve your own agenda. How convenient. |
|||
10-04-2011, 09:46 PM | #480 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
I might suggest that -someone- here, instead of spouting off their ignorance, really ought do their homework and actually do word study on the Hebrew and Greek words for 'anoint', 'anointed' and 'messiah'. Where they occur within the Hebrew texts and what the corresponding word is that is employed within the Greek LXX translation.
Its really not at all that hard to do, for anyone that actually gives a damn, and for those that do, the facts are inescapable. Someone here has already proven that they don't know their ass from a hole in the ground on this particular subject. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|