|
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: The gospel of Mark dates to: | |||
| Canonical Mark 30-50 c.e. |
   
|
1 | 3.45% |
| Canonical Mark Before Peter's death |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Canonical Mark Around Peter's death |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Canonical Mark before the Temple's destruction (65-70) |
  
|
1 | 3.45% |
| Canonical Mark Just after the Temple's destruction (70-75) |
  
|
5 | 17.24% |
| Canonical Mark Sometime just before or after the Temple's destruction (65-75) |
  
|
2 | 6.90% |
| Canonical Mark Last quarter of the first century |
|
3 | 10.34% |
| Canonical Mark Early second century |
|
5 | 17.24% |
| Canonical Mark Bar Kochba baby (ca. 135) |
|
3 | 10.34% |
| Canonical Mark dates to the mid second century, both secret Mark and Ur-Mark predate it |
|
0 | 0% |
| Canonical Mark dates to the mid second century, Ur-Mark predate it but Secret Mark comes after it. |
|
1 | 3.45% |
| Canonical Mark dates to the mid second century, both Proto Mark and Secret Mark predate it |
|
3 | 10.34% |
| Canonical Mark dates to the mid second century, Proto-Mark predate it but Secret Mark comes after it |
|
0 | 0% |
| Secret Mark is a forgery. Duh! |
|
3 | 10.34% |
| Ur or Proto Mark 30-50 c.e. |
|
1 | 3.45% |
| Ur or Proto Mark Before Peter's death |
|
1 | 3.45% |
| Ur or Proto Mark Around Peter's death |
|
0 | 0% |
| Ur or Proto Mark before the Temple's destruction (65-70 |
|
0 | 0% |
| Ur or Proto Mark Just after the Temple's destruction (70-75) |
|
1 | 3.45% |
| Ur or Proto Mark Sometime just before or after the Temple's |
|
0 | 0% |
| Ur or Proto Mark Last quarter of the first century |
|
2 | 6.90% |
| Ur or Proto Mark Early second century |
|
2 | 6.90% |
| Ur or Proto Mark Bar Kochba baby (ca. 135) |
|
1 | 3.45% |
| Ur or Proto Mark dates to the mid second century, both canonical Mark and Secret Mark come after it. |
|
0 | 0% |
| Ur or Proto Mark dates to the mid second century, canonical Mark comes after it but Secret Mark is a forgery. |
|
2 | 6.90% |
| Too many options idiot! |
|
5 | 17.24% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
08-24-2009, 05:06 PM
|
#1 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
|
The Gospel of Mark dates to...
Vote...
|
|
|
08-25-2009, 06:31 AM
|
#2 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,035
|
I don't see what my, or anyone else's, uninformed opinion has to do with the historical facts of when this document was first written. A poll seems a poor choice for such a question.
|
|
|
|
08-25-2009, 06:34 AM
|
#3 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dancing
Posts: 9,940
|
I'm of the opinion that Papias' Mark/Matthew "sayings" is actually "Q", and split between our current Mark being finished either sometime around the destruction of the 2nd Temple or the Bar-Kochba revolt.
|
|
|
|
08-25-2009, 11:15 AM
|
#4 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
|
Quote:
I'll be posting my indisputable evidence for the date of Mark I voted for soon.... Vinnie |
|
|
|
|
08-26-2009, 10:38 AM
|
#5 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
|
bump
|
|
|
|
08-26-2009, 11:20 AM
|
#6 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,305
|
I lean towards bar-Kochba era, but as far as the original Christ myth I would guess earlier, after 70
|
|
|
|
08-28-2009, 03:13 AM
|
#7 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Written by Seneca.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
