![]()  | 
	
		Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#21 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2009 
				Location: Oak Lawn, IL 
				
				
					Posts: 1,620
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Mack is not a Historical Jesus scholar, but he suggests that Jesus was a wandering sage.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#22 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2004 
				Location: Collingswood, NJ 
				
				
					Posts: 1,259
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Do you have thoughts of your own?  You have continuously posted quotes from different scholars but not presented arguments other than "why do you disagree with all these scholars?".  Do you agree with Mack?  If so, why?  If not, why not?  What's your opinion?
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#23 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Nov 2003 
				Location: Eagle River, Alaska 
				
				
					Posts: 7,816
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#24 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2009 
				Location: Oak Lawn, IL 
				
				
					Posts: 1,620
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Yes it is
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#25 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Nov 2003 
				Location: Eagle River, Alaska 
				
				
					Posts: 7,816
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#26 | 
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2006 
				Location: Falls Creek, Oz. 
				
				
					Posts: 11,192
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Another possible solution sees the reconstruction of Q from the Eusebian canon tables. This is not a hypothetical document. There are approximately 600 odd "atomic units of text" addressed in these tables, which were issued with the earliest bibles, probably as "Ready-Reckoners" concerning "Who Agreed With Whom on What".
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
		
  |