Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-01-2009, 01:53 AM | #21 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oak Lawn, IL
Posts: 1,620
|
Mack is not a Historical Jesus scholar, but he suggests that Jesus was a wandering sage.
|
10-01-2009, 04:51 AM | #22 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Collingswood, NJ
Posts: 1,259
|
Do you have thoughts of your own? You have continuously posted quotes from different scholars but not presented arguments other than "why do you disagree with all these scholars?". Do you agree with Mack? If so, why? If not, why not? What's your opinion?
|
10-01-2009, 07:50 AM | #23 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
|
10-03-2009, 06:30 AM | #24 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oak Lawn, IL
Posts: 1,620
|
Yes it is
|
10-03-2009, 08:51 AM | #25 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
|
10-05-2009, 03:30 AM | #26 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Q and the Eusebian canon tables
Another possible solution sees the reconstruction of Q from the Eusebian canon tables. This is not a hypothetical document. There are approximately 600 odd "atomic units of text" addressed in these tables, which were issued with the earliest bibles, probably as "Ready-Reckoners" concerning "Who Agreed With Whom on What".
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|