FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-20-2013, 09:11 AM   #241
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

An examination of Philo's "On the Contemplative Life" will show that he did NOT even mention the words "Jew" or "Jews" in reference to the Theraputae.

There is no mention whatsoever that the Theraputae were circumcised, practised circumcision or called themselves Jews.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 01-20-2013, 09:18 AM   #242
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

He uses the word Israel. Philo almost never (never to my knowledge but I haven't looked) mentions the word Jew or Jewish. No one talks about another man's penis unless it is under very strange circumstances or it is that person's doctor. No one doubts that Philo was Jewish and he never brings up his own jolly roger.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-20-2013, 10:02 AM   #243
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
Whether or not there were non-Jews among the Jews by race, we don't know.

Sure we do.

Gentiles had been worshipping Judaism for centuries but not converting.


Almost all of Christianity were hellenistic people who worshipped Judaism, but were not Jews.

This multitude of gentiles were so numerous mixed in with Judaism, the worlds largest religion formed from them.



I still think many of these Gentiles viewed themselves as Jews, since they had followed Judaism for centuries. If you had worshipped Judaism in a synagogue for centuries, you would view yourself as a Jew to. I think the real Jews looked down upon these people and would never refer to them as Jewish.

Use Paul as a example of how the definition of Judaism changes. He had no adherance to the Noahide laws, and claimed to be a jew of jews.


My point, the definition of Judaism in the first century was more complex and dynamic then appears.
outhouse is offline  
Old 01-20-2013, 02:20 PM   #244
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
He uses the word Israel.
The word "Israelites" is mentioned ONCE and it is in reference to the Israelites that crossed the Red Sea with Moses.

On the Contemplative Life
Quote:
When the Israelites saw and experienced this great miracle, which was an event beyond all description, beyond all imagination, and beyond all hope, both men and women together, under the influence of divine inspiration, becoming all one chorus, sang hymns of thanksgiving to God the Saviour, Moses the prophet leading the men, and Miriam the prophetess leading the women..
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller
Philo almost never (never to my knowledge but I haven't looked) mentions the word Jew or Jewish. No one talks about another man's penis unless it is under very strange circumstances or it is that person's doctor. No one doubts that Philo was Jewish and he never brings up his own jolly roger.
What??? You have exposed yourself as most questionable. How in the world can you make such absurd claims about Philo without even checking??

You talk about strange things of BC&H.

Now, Philo did mention the words "Jew" and "Jewish" in many of his writings-- perhaps over 100 times.


1. "On Embassy to Gaius"

2. "Flaccus"

3. On the Life of Moses, I

4. On the Life of Moses, II

5. The Decalogue

6. The Special Laws, I

7.The Special Laws, II

8. The Special Laws, III

9. The Special Laws, IV

10. On the Virtues

11. Every Good Man is Free

12. On the Eternity of the World.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 01-20-2013, 02:28 PM   #245
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
Use Paul as a example of how the definition of Judaism changes. He had no adherance to the Noahide laws, and claimed to be a jew of jews.
The Pauline writings have NO Provenance in the NT. The Pauline writings cannot be used as an example of the 1st century when it was unknown to the very authors of the Canon.

Only the short gMark has Provenance or is Corroborated in the Canon.

The authors of the Long gMark, gMatthew and gLuke appear to have and was heavily influenced by the short gMark--Not the Pauline letters.

The Pauline letters are example of 2nd century or later.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 01-20-2013, 02:41 PM   #246
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

aa,

No one doubts that the sect adhered to the laws of Israel including the prohibition on venerating foreign gods. The term for such a belief is 'Jewish' even if the sect in question are not strictly Jewish by race (i.e. the Samaritans). There is not a scholar who has ever published anything on the sect who has questioned the 'Jewish' nature of these Therapeutai. You have repeatedly misread the material and besides you are - well - aa.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-20-2013, 03:00 PM   #247
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
aa,

No one doubts that the sect adhered to the laws of Israel including the prohibition on venerating foreign gods. The term for such a belief is 'Jewish' even if the sect in question are not strictly Jewish by race (i.e. the Samaritans). There is not a scholar who has ever published anything on the sect who has questioned the 'Jewish' nature of these Therapeutai. You have repeatedly misread the material and besides you are - well - aa.
No, No, No!!! I have exposed that you are completely unfamiliar with the writings of Philo.

You claimed without even checking that "Philo almost never (never to my knowledge but I haven't looked) mentions the word Jew or Jewish.

Your claim is utterly erroneous.

Philo mentioned Jew and Jewish in over 12 writings which means that you really have little knowledge of the writings of Philo.

Earlier, you claimed the Theraputae were Jewish when no such thing is stated by Philo.

Now, the word Jew and Jewish is NOT found in the writings about the Theraputae.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 01-20-2013, 03:51 PM   #248
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

"Stephan's view" - as if "it's just me" who reads the text this way. Sheesh. Go back under Acharya's skirt. I don't have more time to waste on this
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-20-2013, 04:24 PM   #249
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
You're still pretending there is any doubt about the status of the sect being Jewish. There is no doubt about the sects Jewishness. It is taken for granted in any study or any mention by a reputable scholar.
It is completely erroneous that the Theraputae were Only Jews--completely wrong.

The very texts state clearly that the Theraputae were also Greeks and from other nations.

Nowhere in the Entire Text does it state that the Theraputae were Only Jews.

On the Contemplative Life
Quote:
... Now this class of persons may be met with in many places, for it was fitting that both Greece and the country of the barbarians should partake of whatever is perfectly good; and there is the greatest number of such men in Egypt, in every one of the districts, or nomi as they are called, and especially around Alexandria; (22) and from all quarters those who are the best of these therapeutae proceed on their pilgrimage to some most suitable place as if it were their country...
I find it very distressing that first tanya/avi, and now aa5874, can point to the word Greek in a passage in Philo and claim that as evidence that the therapeutae included Greeks -- when it is clear that Philo is not applying that term to the therapeutae that he describes.

He said that it is fitting for both Greece and other non-Greek countries to partake in what is good. Nothing there about the membership of the therapeutae. How do you get any other meaning out of this?
Toto is offline  
Old 01-20-2013, 04:52 PM   #250
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
You're still pretending there is any doubt about the status of the sect being Jewish. There is no doubt about the sects Jewishness. It is taken for granted in any study or any mention by a reputable scholar.
It is completely erroneous that the Theraputae were Only Jews--completely wrong.

The very texts state clearly that the Theraputae were also Greeks and from other nations.

Nowhere in the Entire Text does it state that the Theraputae were Only Jews.

On the Contemplative Life
Quote:
... Now this class of persons may be met with in many places, for it was fitting that both Greece and the country of the barbarians should partake of whatever is perfectly good; and there is the greatest number of such men in Egypt, in every one of the districts, or nomi as they are called, and especially around Alexandria; (22) and from all quarters those who are the best of these therapeutae proceed on their pilgrimage to some most suitable place as if it were their country...
I find it very distressing that first tanya/avi, and now aa5874, can point to the word Greek in a passage in Philo and claim that as evidence that the therapeutae included Greeks -- when it is clear that Philo is not applying that term to the therapeutae that he describes.

He said that it is fitting for both Greece and other non-Greek countries to partake in what is good. Nothing there about the membership of the therapeutae. How do you get any other meaning out of this?
You MUST READ the whole text to get the context of the passage.

You MUST READ all of "On the Contemplative Life.

The Therapeutae were from many NATIONS.

The Therapeutae was a sect of Mankind--not just Jews.

On the Contemplative Life
Quote:
But the therapeutic sect of mankind, being continually taught to see without interruption, may well aim at obtaining a sight of the living God, and may pass by the sun, which is visible to the outward sense, and never leave this order which conducts to perfect happiness...
aa5874 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:24 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.