FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-19-2008, 12:44 PM   #251
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post

Who is Gads?
Sorry, GakuseiDon.
Quote:
OK - what evidence would you accept? You seem to feel that any statement by an early century Christian that speaks in supernatural terms has to mean something else, even if every other person in the world reads it as influenced by supernatural thinking.
A text from the time that illustrates a supernatural school of thought’s understanding of the world is what I want most.

Beyond that, supernatural understandings from the early church founders that can’t be confused with metaphysical.

I would also like criteria established for determining if scripture should be interpreted supernaturally or metaphysically and how to differentiate between the two types of thinking.
Quote:
How often do we have to repeat that "influenced by" is not the same as "identical to?" How often do we have to point out that Middle Platonists believed in supernatural entities?
I think that Richard Carrier's PhD thesis directly addresses your claims. It will be published at some point. You can email him if you wish. (Look him up on the II Modern Library.)
I’m not saying they were identical am I? I’m saying they were influenced by their world view.

It can be pointed out all day but until someone actually takes the time to read the texts that are being used to base the evidence on and discuss them then it’s just another man’s opinion to me with no evidence.

So far no one has joined in the conversation that understands Platonism, GakuseiDon admitted he isn’t an authority on the subject and just seems to be cutting and pasting from online nor appears to have read the texts that he is citing beforehand. So far there is no one in this conversation in the position to argue against me that the middle Platonist believed in them being natural spirits instead of supernatural demons.

You seem more familiar with Richard Carrier, you can email him and ask for the evidence you’re looking for if you wish.
Elijah is offline  
Old 09-19-2008, 12:47 PM   #252
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
Descends from heaven... not living there.
The Lord descends and takes the faithful back up to live with the Lord forever.

When will you read the passage?

Quote:
If it said Jesus came from San Fransisco (instead of heaven) and they meet in Chicago (clouds) are they still in San Francisco?
If, to maintain the analogy rather than break it as you do, it said they were taken back from whence the Lord came to live with the Lord forever, yes. Obviously.
It doesn't say they go back to heaven does it? From heaven to meet in the air.
Elijah is offline  
Old 09-19-2008, 12:48 PM   #253
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
I've presented evidence of my position that no one has argued against...
That is simply and demonstrably false. The fallacy in your generalization has been pointed out by several people.

Quote:
...and I'm not even sure what everyone's exact complaint about what I'm saying is.
Given how many times it has been repeated to you, that is difficult to believe.

You have nothing that actually supports your assertion and it is explictly contradicted by a plain reading of the texts. :banghead:

Quote:
I would not be on here having this conversation if I was just a parrot for another person's ideas.
You might have an actual basis for your conclusion, though.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 09-19-2008, 12:50 PM   #254
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
Amaleq has one quote that he is misreading.
I've since offered a second but you have presented nothing but your personal opinion to oppose a plain reading of either passage.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 09-19-2008, 12:52 PM   #255
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post


You have nothing that actually supports your assertion and it is explictly contradicted by a plain reading of the texts. :banghead:

Quote:
I would not be on here having this conversation if I was just a parrot for another person's ideas.
You might have an actual basis for your conclusion, though.
You have nothing that supports your position (IMO). Ive shown platonic influence, you have not shown supernatural thought.

Your plain reading is a supernatural take.
Elijah is offline  
Old 09-19-2008, 12:53 PM   #256
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
It doesn't say they go back to heaven does it? From heaven to meet in the air.
So the Lord descends from heaven and whisks the faithful into the air where they will live with the Lord forever? And this is somehow less supernatural than the notion that they will complete the journey up to heaven? :rolling:
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 09-19-2008, 12:54 PM   #257
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
Amaleq has one quote that he is misreading.
I've since offered a second but you have presented nothing but your personal opinion to oppose a plain reading of either passage.
Did i miss something? I'm sorry, I thought we were just talking about the the Thessalonians verse.
Elijah is offline  
Old 09-19-2008, 12:54 PM   #258
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
Beyond that, supernatural understandings from the early church founders that can’t be confused with metaphysical.
There is no such statement since you have shown yourself fully capable of confusing even the most explicitly supernatural statement with some sort of metaphysical reflection.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 09-19-2008, 12:55 PM   #259
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
It doesn't say they go back to heaven does it? From heaven to meet in the air.
So the Lord descends from heaven and whisks the faithful into the air where they will live with the Lord forever? And this is somehow less supernatural than the notion that they will complete the journey up to heaven? :rolling:
As long as your able to differentiate between what he is saying and the astral from of afterlife is all I'm asking right now.

Eternal life, super power, and the resurrection can all be understood rationally especially if you have a flawed view of the world.
Elijah is offline  
Old 09-19-2008, 12:58 PM   #260
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
There is no such statement since you have shown yourself fully capable of confusing even the most explicitly supernatural statement with some sort of metaphysical reflection.
I don't think it was me who misunderstood the verse. I think it was you who couldn't differentiate between where he came from and where they were going.
Elijah is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:48 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.