FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-01-2006, 10:38 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 927
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loomis View Post
A: Because it’s fiction. They are not real gods at all. There is no correct answer. The various authors who wrote about them didn’t really understand or agree with each other about who or what ‘God’ was. They didn’t really care. They were just borrowing characters and events, and creating new stories, without regard for the previous author’s intentions.
Yes, you are right. Thank you for that quote and Roller too.
demoninho is offline  
Old 09-01-2006, 10:49 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The recesses of Zaphon
Posts: 969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roller View Post
Divine Council in Deut 32:8-9 says: "When the Most High (El Elyon) gave to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of men, he fixed the bounds of the peoples according to the number of the sons of God.
9: For the LORD's (YHWH) portion is his people, Jacob his allotted heritage." (RSV)

*I added "El Elyon" and "YHWH" in parentheses*

Looks like author of this verse thought them separate too.
Yep. Yahweh had 69 siblings. One day El divided up humanity among his sons.

Yahweh inherited the Israelites.

Chemosh inherited the Moabites.

Milcom inherited the Ammonites.

Baal inherited the Canaanites.


They were all just one big family of gods back then. :rolling:
Loomis is offline  
Old 09-03-2006, 04:02 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 927
Default

Could you give me the verse were this is described? I read Deut 32 but couldnt find this.
demoninho is offline  
Old 09-03-2006, 10:21 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The recesses of Zaphon
Posts: 969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by demoninho View Post
Could you give me the verse were this is described? I read Deut 32 but couldnt find this.
I was just making jokes for readers who already understand this stuff. There is no specific verse that says Chemosh inherited the Moabites, or Milcom inherited the Ammonites, or Baal inherited the Canaanites, but it is a logical continuation of father/ sibling hierarchy described at Deut 32:8-9, and it is consistent with other passages. For an example see 1 Kings 11.

All the best,

Loomis
Loomis is offline  
Old 09-04-2006, 04:57 PM   #15
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by demoninho View Post
Could you give me the verse were this is described? I read Deut 32 but couldnt find this.
Doesn't exist in most translations. However, the verse in question is Deuteronomy 32:8-9. In the Revised Standard Version, it reads:
Quote:
When the Most High gave to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of men, he fixed the bounds of the peoples according to the number of the sons of God.

For the LORD's portion is his people, Jacob his allotted heritage.
Most translations render it something like this:
Quote:
When the Most High gave the nations their inheritance, when he divided all mankind, he set up boundaries for the peoples according to the number of the sons of Israel.

For the LORD's portion is his people, Jacob his allotted heritage.
The word translated in all cases as "Most High" is Elohim. The word translated as the LORD in all cases is YHWH/Yahweh.

The contentious word - "Israel" in most translations, and "God" (in the 'El') form in the RSV and in an alternate reading in the New Living Translation, is attested from different manuscripts. 'Israel' comes from manuscripts of the Masoretic Text. The RSV translation, "sons of God ('El')", comes from a manuscript found among the Dead Sea Scrolls, probably the oldest extant manuscript containing that verse. The NLT relies on the Septuagint. The Septuagint was a Greek Translation which was in use earlier than the Masoretic Text, and before the production of the manuscripts found among the Dead Sea Scrolls, but which, I believe, is only available from manuscripts more recent than the Masoretic Text (corrections welcome on this point!). That version reads, "When the Most High assigned lands to the nations, when he divided up the human race, he established the boundaries of the peoples according to the number of angelic beings (literally, Angels of God). For the people of Israel belong to the Lord; Jacob is his special possession." (Parentheses mine).

For a variety of reasons, I think that the RSV's rendering is likely the "correct" one, but it's pretty confusing sometimes to read a verse on the internet that isn't to be found in any Bible you are likely to be familiar with from church.
uu72 is offline  
Old 09-04-2006, 05:09 PM   #16
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A pale blue oblate spheroid.
Posts: 20,351
Default

I dunno, but one of the verses mentions Polytheism...

Psalm 82
A psalm of Asaph.

God presides in the great assembly;
he gives judgment among the "gods"

?
GenesisNemesis is offline  
Old 09-04-2006, 09:34 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The recesses of Zaphon
Posts: 969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by uu72 View Post
The word translated in all cases as "Most High" is Elohim.
Loomis is offline  
Old 09-04-2006, 09:52 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The recesses of Zaphon
Posts: 969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenesisNemesis View Post
I dunno, but one of the verses mentions Polytheism...

Psalm 82
A psalm of Asaph.

God presides in the great assembly;
he gives judgment among the "gods"

?
That is a very interesting Psalm - for two reasons:

1) It does not mention Yahweh anywhere.

2) It uses Elohim (singular - a title) and elohim (plural - gods) right next to each other.

I bet the first Elohim is a gloss (or whatever you want to call it). Maybe the original looked like one of these:

Yahweh stands in the assembly of El;
in the midst of the gods he renders judgment.

The son of Man stands in the assembly of El;
in the midst of the gods he renders judgment.

Melchizedek stands in the assembly of El;
in the midst of the gods he renders judgment.

Baal stands in the assembly of El;
in the midst of the gods he renders judgment.


But I am high on something and I have no idea why I would think this.

All the best,

Loomis
Loomis is offline  
Old 09-05-2006, 04:08 AM   #19
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loomis View Post
In all cases under discussion, that is. :Cheeky:
uu72 is offline  
Old 09-05-2006, 05:09 AM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,230
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loomis View Post


But I am high on something and I have no idea why I would think this.
Maybe you're not, but the guy that wrote it was. :devil3:
Magdlyn is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:50 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.