FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-08-2006, 05:50 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 4,287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesABrown View Post
What's not often mentioned in a Judeo-Christian context was Abraham's treatment of his first born son Ishmael and his mother Hagar. Sarah didn't like them (even though it was her idea to have Abraham sleep with Hagar to begin with), and after nagging Abraham about it long enough, Abraham just kicks them out into the wilderness to die.

Why Muslims consider Abraham to be a hero is beyond me.
The year before I joined my bible course one of the participants in the course had finished a chapter on Abraham. He was a Roman Catholic and had never really read the bible. His conclusion when he came into class was that, "That Abraham was a right sorry bastard."

Can't fault his conclusion myself.
WishboneDawn is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 06:01 AM   #22
JPD
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 5,322
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WishboneDawn View Post
The year before I joined my bible course one of the participants in the course had finished a chapter on Abraham. He was a Roman Catholic and had never really read the bible. His conclusion when he came into class was that, "That Abraham was a right sorry bastard."

Can't fault his conclusion myself.
So....quite marvellous in the eyes of the Lord then.
JPD is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 06:01 AM   #23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 932
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin View Post

Given that we have two participants, Abraham and Isaac, we can have two different accounts written describing the events which happened. If both men wrote separate accounts of the incident . . .
Any comment that includes this phrase can be ignored (unless you want to accept the idea that two scraps of papyrus were retained for 1,000 years).

Historians try to determine how the OT came into being - read Finkelstein's Who Wrote the Bible. The faithful accept fairy tales that Moses wrote the stories.
gregor is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 07:25 AM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by douglas View Post
What about it being ok to have adulterous sex with your maidservant? How's that for a precedent?
Considering that his wife encouraged him to do it, I think it was an excellent precedent.
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 10:15 PM   #25
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NE OH
Posts: 141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4 billion View Post
When Abraham threatens to kill a child old enough to know what is going on, to prove he believes in his God, and then is magically rewarded for this perverted act, I see a precedent being set for the next 2700 years. This is, that it is ok to abuse children.
Plus the fact that the whole exercise is pointless, as is the story of Job.

If Yahweh is omniscient, then He knows full well what Abraham's and Job's thoughts are and what they will do.

There is therefore no need whatsoever for Yahweh's barbaric "tests".
mickw is offline  
Old 11-09-2006, 02:50 AM   #26
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 166
Default More christian child abuse

A 17-year-old woman has been taken into custody for the crime of being pregnant but not married. During a night-time raid, Queensland police officers removed the woman from the home she shared with her partner and placed her in a prison holding cell. She was then transferred to the Holy Cross Catholic girl's home, to work without pay in the laundry until she gives birth. It is expected that a married couple will adopt the baby.

IF THIS appeared in today's Age the reaction would be one of shock and disbelief. Surely the officers should be charged with kidnapping, the Catholic institution investigated for slavery and the woman counselled and compensated.

But when it happened to Lily Arthur in 1967, Australia was a very different place. Single mothers were at the mercy of a postwar system that supported the illegal removal of illegitimate children from their mothers. The practice claimed the babies of more than 150,000 women.

I feel the acceptance of the abuse carried out by Abraham, made it possible for such horrors as stealing children from single mother's.

http://www.theage.com.au/news/tv--ra...278147632.html

christian scum
4 billion is offline  
Old 11-09-2006, 03:28 AM   #27
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 166
Default

To add a more personal dimension to the tendency of Christians to child abuse, I was taken away from my parents at age 12, and sent to a Christian school. I left this hell hole when I was 17. As this experience left me a suicidal nut bag for a certain period of my life, I have had a vested interest in determining why this occured. I have come to the conclusion that a child should not be sent away from it's parents before the age of 16-18, hardly surprising. The Christians think it is ok for a child of age 12 to leave home, a perverted concept indeed.
4 billion is offline  
Old 11-09-2006, 04:12 AM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4 billion View Post
To add a more personal dimension to the tendency of Christians to child abuse, I was taken away from my parents at age 12, and sent to a Christian school. I left this hell hole when I was 17. As this experience left me a suicidal nut bag for a certain period of my life, I have had a vested interest in determining why this occured. I have come to the conclusion that a child should not be sent away from it's parents before the age of 16-18, hardly surprising. The Christians think it is ok for a child of age 12 to leave home, a perverted concept indeed.
Why on earth were you taken away from your parents? What was the rationale the police used to justify that?
rhutchin is offline  
Old 11-09-2006, 06:57 AM   #29
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 166
Default

I wasn't taken forcibly, I am saying 'taken' in the sense my parents, due to their Christian ethics and morals, thought that sending me away was a good thing. They suppressed their natural parental urges under direction of the Church. The irony is that they paid money to the Church to do this.
4 billion is offline  
Old 11-09-2006, 07:55 AM   #30
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4 billion View Post
I wasn't taken forcibly, I am saying 'taken' in the sense my parents, due to their Christian ethics and morals, thought that sending me away was a good thing. They suppressed their natural parental urges under direction of the Church. The irony is that they paid money to the Church to do this.
4 billion,

If you don't mind me asking, what church were you a member of?

In your OP, you suggested that the story of Abraham was precendent for God allowing child abuse. Did your parent's see a connection between this story and their decision to send you away?

On a personal note, I was a real prick to my parents when I was 12 and I'm sure they had thoughts of sending me away. I guess I'm just lucky they didn't have the money to do it.
douglas is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:28 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.