![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Spain
Posts: 28
|
![]()
Que de la verdadera inexistencia de Dios se sigue su existencia.
1) Toda verdad remite a otra. De lo contrario, el l�*mite de la verdad ser�*a una no-verdad, en la que aquélla encontrar�*a su comienzo y su fin. Lo falso engendrar�*a a lo cierto, y lo cierto a lo falso. 2) Las verdades, pues, sean cuales sean, nos conducen, mediante un encadenamiento infinito, a la Verdad suprema e inalcanzable, que es Dios. 3) Afirmar una sola verdad que sea tal, y no sólo de nombre, supone negar el l�*mite que la cancelar�*a, afirmar la infinitud de la progresión y, por consiguiente, afirmar a Dios. 4) Luego, aunque esa supuesta verdad fuera "Dios no existe", al predicarse como verdad, de ella se sigue que Dios, es decir la Verdad, existe. 5) Pero, si Dios existe, la mayor es falsa, y si no existe también, pues no existe la Verdad ni tampoco las verdades. Luego, de un modo u otro, Dios existe. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Moderator - Science Discussions
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Providence, RI, USA
Posts: 9,908
|
![]()
As with the previous thread you started, this does not belong in S&S.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,424
|
![]()
No, no hay un Dios. Lo siento mucho.
"serêa" Que? El "ê" no existe en español. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Moderator - Miscellaneous Discussions
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Shenzhen, S.E. China (UK ex-pat)
Posts: 14,249
|
![]()
The quality of this thread floweth over
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,283
|
![]()
How... useful. I'm guessing that the general thrust of the argument is 'God exists because I say so'. Anyone who speaks Spanish able to tell me if I'm close?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 567
|
![]() Quote:
That probably is a badly formatted é. Quote:
- The truth leads to the ultimate Truth, which is God. - God does not exist is true. - Therefore, God exists and is the Truth. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The centre of infinity
Posts: 1,181
|
![]()
Brilliant! By posting in a language that many here don't speak,he's avoided the thorny problem of having everyone refute it.
For his next post,I'd suggest going with Klingon. There are probably less speakers of that than the Spanish speakers,so virtually no one will be able to respond. He'll be able to say,truthfully,that no one could answer his arguments. If he can sufficiently couch it in gibberish,as well as some of the other posters that end up Elsewhere,he may have an unbeatable combination. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Innsmouth
Posts: 1,296
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,283
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Romania
Posts: 4,975
|
![]()
Heh, I'm a latin-based language speaker. I could understand, even if I don't know french. Not only is his argument strangely in a languange that most of the posters don't know....it's not even original! IIRC, millenia old really.
It's a strange version of uncaused cause, only it's with truths this time. Apparently if you go back by truths, you must reach the original truth - God. Would you like fries with that non-sequitur? |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|