Freethought & Rationalism Archive

beyelzu · 10-08-2003, 02:01 PM

Gurdur,

I have posted in response to you 4 times that have gone unresponded, I understand at least one of the nonresponses could be due to mod warnings, the other three??

I could assume that you just dont wish to respond to me because you find my statements unworthy of response, but I think that that might be a logical fallacy so I wont.

Celsus · 10-09-2003, 03:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gurdur
Were more atheists here to actually use logic and stringent naturalist metaphysics, we'ld all be better off.

What do you mean by "naturalist metaphysics"? You may PM or start a new thread if you find this tangential.

Joel

livius drusus · 10-09-2003, 04:57 AM

New thread, definitely.

Gurdur · 10-09-2003, 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Beyelzu
Gurdur,
I have posted in response to you 4 times that have gone unresponded, I understand at least one of the nonresponses could be due to mod warnings, the other three??

Dunno.
How about you sum up the points you wished to make in a new post just here, and I'll respond to it ?

Quote:

I could assume that you just dont wish to respond to me because you find my statements unworthy of response, but I think that that might be a logical fallacy so I wont.

Probably just as well.

__________

Quote:

Originally posted by Celsus

What do you mean by "naturalist metaphysics"? You may PM or start a new thread if you find this tangential.

No, on the whole you may start up a new thread, and that in the Philosophy forum. I'll respond to your new thread there.

beyelzu · 10-09-2003, 10:27 AM

gurdur, you dont see your "subtle" sarcasm as being a form of ridicule???

I do. Many smileys and dripping tone.

Do you feel that your form doesnt cross some line and if so how do you draw the line.

You have to know that your tone can be infuriating, dont you??

Gurdur · 10-09-2003, 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Beyelzu

gurdur, you dont see your "subtle" sarcasm as being a form of ridicule???
I do. Many smileys and dripping tone.
Do you feel that your form doesnt cross some line and if so how do you draw the line.
You have to know that your tone can be infuriating, dont you??

Irrelevant to thread topic.
Should you have any serious complaint, contact the mods; otherwise, you can also PM me.
Given the level shown of sheer general vitriol on this thread and others, I can't see why you're complaining about me, nor is it a suitable topic.

beyelzu · 10-09-2003, 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gurdur
Irrelevant to thread topic.
Should you have any serious complaint, contact the mods; otherwise, you can also PM me.
Given the level shown of sheer general vitriol on this thread and others, I can't see why you're complaining about me, nor is it a suitable topic.

I am not complaining, and the thread has covered ridicule and nobdoy seemed to feel it was off topic.

You also condemned ridicule, and yet you use subtle forms of it. so why is that acceptable?

Gurdur · 10-09-2003, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Beyelzu

I am not complaining, and the thread has covered ridicule and nobdoy seemed to feel it was off topic.
....

You are ignoring two modertors' general warnings to stay on topic in this thread. The topic is atheist stereotypes and reactions thereto.
You may ignore such mods' warnings --- I will not play along with suchlike.

Furthermore, I'vew noted that the use of venomous d hominems in too large and consistant a fashion is what can very well lead to stereotyping of atheists among Christians.

If you won't quote my exact words, and you keep on making slightly false claims as to what I said, there is no point in responding to you till you do so.
Now: back on-topic !

beyelzu · 10-09-2003, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gurdur
You are ignoring two modertors' general warnings to stay on topic in this thread. The topic is atheist stereotypes and reactions thereto.
You may ignore such mods' warnings --- I will not play along with suchlike.

Furthermore, I'vew noted that the use of venomous d hominems in too large and consistant a fashion is what can very well lead to stereotyping of atheists among Christians.

If you won't quote my exact words, and you keep on making slightly false claims as to what I said, there is no point in responding to you till you do so.
Now: back on-topic !

I havent seen a single moderator warning that ridicule is off topic. If they feel it is they can warn me or ban me. You, gurdur, are not a moderator. I think that I am on topic. and you are still dodging my questions.

Gurdur · 10-09-2003, 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Beyelzu

I havent seen a single moderator warning that ridicule is off topic.

So read the thread.

Quote:

I think that I am on topic.

You're wrong.

Quote:

and you are still dodging my questions.

No;
I've told you I am complying with the mods' warnings, and also that your claims are irrelevant.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

10-08-2003, 02:01 PM	#541
beyelzu Veteran Member Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: the peach state ga I am a metaphysical naturalist Posts: 2,869	Gurdur, I have posted in response to you 4 times that have gone unresponded, I understand at least one of the nonresponses could be due to mod warnings, the other three?? I could assume that you just dont wish to respond to me because you find my statements unworthy of response, but I think that that might be a logical fallacy so I wont.

10-09-2003, 04:57 AM	#543
livius drusus Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Selva Oscura Posts: 4,120	New thread, definitely.

10-09-2003, 10:27 AM	#545
beyelzu Veteran Member Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: the peach state ga I am a metaphysical naturalist Posts: 2,869	gurdur, you dont see your "subtle" sarcasm as being a form of ridicule??? I do. Many smileys and dripping tone. Do you feel that your form doesnt cross some line and if so how do you draw the line. You have to know that your tone can be infuriating, dont you??

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.