FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-07-2005, 03:07 AM   #391
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mata leao
You see Sauron doesnt really truly understand the Bible or how Hebrew prophets think and talk and foretell prophecy...

...Hebrew prophets preferred to merge the immediate future and the distant future without always indicating any "bright line" time signals. A prophecy usually will have a local, partial fulfillment and a remote, complete fulfillment.And even here, some prophecies will be fulfilled only completely upon the return of Jesus to earth.
Um, no. This is a fantasy of Christian apologists.

The Jews developed a literary habit of "midrash", in which they sought to link new stories to older ones by quoting the older scripture, expanding on themes and ideas first presented in the older scripture, and so forth. But there is no evidence that the Old Testament prophets themselves deliberately created "dual fulfilment" prophecies. This belief among apologists apparently arose in a feeble attempt to justify the blatant misuse of out-of-context quotes by later authors, most notably the author of the Gospel of Matthew.

Also, they weren't really interested in predicting the distant future. They were ranting to those then in power.
Quote:
Tactical and strategic prophetic ambiguity was no idle dodge but rather a type of proportionalistic "warning" .... to be "undone" or "cut off" or told you "shall die" was often a "delayed fuse" which would not see generational impact until hundreds of years later.
...More apologetic fantasies to excuse prophecy-failure.
Quote:
If caught in a bitter blizzard and a man falls through the ice far from fire and warmth, an eskimo guide will say , in reference to the man whose clothes are now covered in freezing water but who has been rescued..."your friend is dead",meanang...although you are just standing there freezing right now, in an hour or two you will be dead.
I'm guessing this is part of an apologetic excuse for the Christian misinterpretation of Genesis 2:17. See Adam and Eve: there was no "spiritual death"
Quote:
why is there never any scholarly peer reviewed (by world class scholars in directly applicable fields) studies which show Bible prophecy is in error?
Probably for the same reason there aren't any scholarly peer-reviewed (by world class scholars in directly applicable fields) studies which show that the Earth is not flat.
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 11-07-2005, 07:47 AM   #392
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mata leao
oy vey, it may come as a shock to some, but a very large body of scholarly information is simply not on the internet.
Absolutely correct.

The enormous amount of scholarly information on the internet regarding the existence of invisible pink unicorns on the third outer planet of the Tau Ceti system is meagre, at best.

Your argument is irrefutable.
John A. Broussard is offline  
Old 11-07-2005, 04:14 PM   #393
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Illinois, USA
Posts: 319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven
Small question: In your opinion, does this look more like a failed prophecy or more like a fulfilled one?
You see, 100% certainty is impossibly anyway, so I just want you to give a percentage of how likely it is that this prophecy was fulfilled.
I'll start with my estimation: about 0.0000000001%.
On to you.
Based on the knowledge I have about this prophecy, I'd say it's highly unlikely the prophecy was fulfilled. I've read every explanation I could find by Christian apologists, and none come even close to showing how this prophecy was fulfilled.

BUT, there may be something that I don't understand or know which prevents me from understanding it. So I'm still allowing for the possiblity that this is indeed a fulfilled prophecy.
luminous is offline  
Old 11-08-2005, 05:42 AM   #394
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default The destruction of Tyre

Quote:
Originally Posted by Liviu
Based on the knowledge I have about this prophecy, I'd say it's highly unlikely the prophecy was fulfilled. I've read every explanation I could find by Christian apologists, and none come even close to showing how this prophecy was fulfilled.

BUT, there may be something that I don't understand or know which prevents me from understanding it. So I'm still allowing for the possiblity that this is indeed a fulfilled prophecy.
Do you have any credible evidence that the predictions predated the events? If not, then your argument is not valid. If the predictions post-dated the events, then obviously the supposed prophecy is not a prophecy. Even if the prophecy predated the events, and even if the events happened, what about the prophecy indicates divine inspiration?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 11-08-2005, 02:40 PM   #395
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Illinois, USA
Posts: 319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
Do you have any credible evidence that the predictions predated the events? If not, then your argument is not valid. If the predictions post-dated the events, then obviously the supposed prophecy is not a prophecy.
1. We already had this discussion. See page 14.
2. If I don't see any possible fulfillment to the prophecy anyway, dating is irrelevant.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
Even if the prophecy predated the events, and even if the events happened, what about the prophecy indicates divine inspiration?
I've already answered this.
luminous is offline  
Old 11-08-2005, 02:55 PM   #396
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default The destruction of Tyre

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnySkeptic
Even if the prophecy predated the events, and even if the events happened, what about the prophecy indicates divine inspiration?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liviu
I've already answered this.
Where was that? Since you do not claim that the Tyre prophecy came true, will you please start a new thread regarding another prophecy of your choosing that 1) provably predates the events, 2) came true, and 3) indicates divine inspiration?

What is the point of prophecy? Is God trying to convince people that he can predict the future? Have any of his predictions helped people to avoid natural disasters and plagues?

By the way, even if God can predict the future, I would not worship him because of his questionable character. Logically, there is no automatic correlation that can be made between the ability to predict the future and goodness unless the possesor of such an ability were to consistently make lots of predictions that helped people avoid such things as natural disasters and plagues. If you had the ability to predict where hurricanes will go, would you publish your predictions?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 11-11-2005, 08:36 AM   #397
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: tampa,florida
Posts: 342
Default

continued.......wow, what a week, sorry it took so long to get back, a few more weeks like this one and I can retire erlier than I had planned...anyway...where were we? I was hoping to finish posting more of the material I had on the Hebrew way of thinking and writing in the prophetic, but I can always post the rest of the material later. Analysis 1! (keep in mind that some woul d say there are about thirty of these, so if you want to "crucify" someone for an analysis you dont like-then as a mideast studies prof I once had said"you pays your money you takes your choice(quoting P.T. Barnum).....1. Ezekiel is a captive/exiled intellectual who is being treated fairly well by the Babylonians, given the Babylonian system of triaining selected captives as "bureacrats",etc. b. The jews despise the people of Tyre for the forced prostitution and concubinry of young jewish girls and also they despise the people of Tyre for their idolatry, immorality and many other reasons. c. The jews dont exactly have any love's labors lost for the Babylonians either (who invaded them and took them captive). d. and the jews dont like the Greeks either, the Greeks are major "facilitators" in taking jewish people into slavery, especially children.e. Ezekiel wants Babylon to destroy and humiliate Tyre. Ezekile also wants to weaken and wear out the bablyonian "hegemony" in the mediteranean(which will eventually facilitate jewish liberation) and Ezekiel wants to see the arrogant Greeks recklessly overextend their conquests and be weakened by "diseconomies of scale". f. Ezekiel is no mere armchair strategic dreamer- he is a prophet of Almighty Jehovah God. g. Ezekiel brillianty sets forth the propehcy concering the destruction of Tyre. It succeeds brilliantly. It emboldens the Babylonians to launch the first "wave" against Tyre, without telegraphing to the Babylonians (who are having cash flow problems of empire and need spoils/treasure) that they will fail in this, and it succeeds in giving the people of Tyre a false sense of security (given they are a strong sea power and can jettison their mainland position and smugly stand firm on their island fortress),and it leads to the repatriation of the jewish captives/slaves and children from the mainland of Tyre,and h. Ezekiel, by "telescoping" his prophecy, gives cover to the Greeks who will use a brilliant and completely unexpected miracle of military engineering to defeat Tyre. And for the hat trick! Alexander dies in Babylon(of malaria or likely venereal disease from his bisexual immorality)! Not bad Ezekiel, not bad!
mata leao is offline  
Old 11-11-2005, 09:17 AM   #398
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

mata leao:

You seem to have entirely overlooked the fact that the prophecy FAILED.

Nebuchadrezzar failed to perform the actions that HE (specifically) was prophesied to do: notably, to breach Tyre's walls.

You also overlooked Ezekiel's second prophecy-failure regarding Nebuchadrezzar: he was promised Egypt as compensation for the failure at Tyre, and that failed too.
Quote:
The jews despise the people of Tyre for the forced prostitution and concubinry of young jewish girls and also they despise the people of Tyre for their idolatry, immorality and many other reasons. c. The jews dont exactly have any love's labors lost for the Babylonians either (who invaded them and took them captive). d. and the jews dont like the Greeks either, the Greeks are major "facilitators" in taking jewish people into slavery, especially children.
...Evidence would be useful here.

And the great expansion of Greek power came long AFTER these events, and Tyre played NO part in Alexander's eventual death.

You seem to be posting from a parallel Universe.
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 11-11-2005, 09:26 AM   #399
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: tampa,florida
Posts: 342
Default

jack, are you smoking something? the prophecy succeeded to the letter brilliantly. Tyre (the empire of tyre-the greatest sea power in the region) was destroyed and never rebuilt.and i didnt say tyre played ANY part in his death, I noted that death in BABLYON as somehthing of a humorous aside(a kind of-you Greeks sold our children into protstitution and mighty Aleaxander died like a dog in his own filth from venereal disease in BABYLON)....
mata leao is offline  
Old 11-11-2005, 10:07 AM   #400
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default The destruction of Tyre

Quote:
Originally Posted by mata leao
Ezekiel is no mere armchair strategic dreamer- he is a prophet of Almighty Jehovah God. Ezekiel brillianty sets forth the propehcy concering the destruction of Tyre.
Ezekiel did nothing of the kind. Hundreds, if not thousands of people surely knew of Nebuchadnezzar's invasion plans months in advance. A spy might easily have carried the news to Ezekiel. In addition, ancient historian Richard Carrier said that Ezekiel might have learned of the invasion first hand by travelling to Babylon. Given Nebuchadnezzar's great power, his proven penchant for conquest, the riches of Tyre, and Babylon's close proximity to Tyre, it would have been unusual if he had not attacked Tyre.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mata leao
It succeeds brilliantly. It emboldens the Babylonians to launch the first "wave" against Tyre, without telegraphing to the Babylonians (who are having cash flow problems of empire and need spoils/treasure) that they will fail in this, and it succeeds in giving the people of Tyre a false sense of security (given they are a strong sea power and can jettison their mainland position and smugly stand firm on their island fortress),and it leads to the repatriation of the jewish captives/slaves and children from the mainland of Tyre,and h. Ezekiel, by "telescoping" his prophecy, gives cover to the Greeks who will use a brilliant and completely unexpected miracle of military engineering to defeat Tyre. And for the hat trick! Alexander dies in Babylon(of malaria or likely venereal disease from his bisexual immorality)! Not bad Ezekiel, not bad!
Rubbish. Historically, kingdoms rising and falling has been the rule, not the exception. Who says bisexuality is immoral? Most certainly not God. God has never made a public statement about bisexuality and homosexuality.

Regarding your "brilliant and completely unexpected miracle" in reference to Alexander's land bridge to the island, military historians will tell you that military history is full of brilliant, completely unexpected military strategies.

Nebuchadnezzar and Alexander were pagan conquerers and murderers, and they most certainly were not friends of God and Jews. The Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia 2004 says "On March 16, 597 BC, he (Nebuchadnezzar) captured Jerusalem and took Jehoichin, king of Judah, and many of his people captive to Babylonia. He was subsequently troubled by major revolts in Babylonia (595 BC) and in Judah (588-587 BC), which were vigorously punished; many more Jews were exiled to Babylonia."

What evidence do you have that the Tyre prophecy was not made after the events? What evidence do you have that the prophecy was not revised decades after it was written. Unless you can accurately date the prophecy, you shouldn't call it a prophecy.

You love to crow about how God defeated his enemies, but during much of human history, including today, God's enemies have done quite well against his people. Christians are in fact their own worst enemies. Eating harmful foods and/or smoking cigarettes cause more premature deaths by far than from all other causes combined (Is this not immoral from a Christian viewpoint?), and yet you have the audacity to call Alexander and bisexuality immoral.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:03 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.