![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Narcisco, RRR
Posts: 527
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: (GSV) Lasting Damage
Posts: 10,734
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
|
![]()
In this same vein, we have a guy at DarwinTalk:
***************** Were we to be standing at near sea level on our planet’s surface, we would be accelerating downward toward its core point at nearly twenty-two miles an hour. The further we were to travel downward the greater this relative speed (force) would become (the greater the amount of energy a hydroelectric plant could generate in each second). This is evidenced physically in the “Gutenberg discontinuity�? at the 2,160 mile location from earth’s core point where mass density jumps form 6 to 9 grams per cubic centimeter. At his location secondary waves no longer penetrate and seismographs can no longer detect any mass movement. Mass at this location has begun to lose its outer electron tension and so it collapses into a closer shell where there is greater resistance to being compressed. The following are acceleration values for mass located at different positions outward from the core point of our planet: 1,500 miles from the core point of our planet mass would be accelerating downward at nearly 152 miles an hour. (Remembering that it is but the resistance of the mass below that keeps the mass above from actually, instantly accelerating to this speed within one second, for in physical actuality the mass is accelerating at that speed, just as you are actually accelerating at 22 mph at sea level, which is why you are kept where you are). 100 miles away from the core point acceleration would become 34,470 miles an hour. 10 miles away from the core point acceleration would become 957 MILES PER SECOND or 3,445,200 miles an hour. Then at 0.717 miles from the core point of our planet mass in this location IS accelerating at 186,258 MILES PER SECOND. This speed is about 25 miles per second less than that of the speed of light. Were a mass to move just a fraction closer than this distance, to say 0.716 miles from the core point of our planet, then its downward acceleration would become 186,779 miles per second. The attractive force acting on the mass would cause it to accelerate to a speed greater than that of the speed of light in one second. At this point a dilemma arises. What happens inward, beyond the 0.717 mile location within the core point of our planet? There are three options: The first option would be that there exists a new form of matter. This mass would have the ability to remain related to us at present while also remaining atomically accelerated to a speed far beyond that of the speed of light The second option would be that matter, as we know it, within the core of our planet, as that of our sun, is non-existent. At near the 400 mile location from the core point of our sun its mass would be accelerating atomically to a speed greater than that of the speed of light, just as it does at the 0.716 distance within earth, so mass could not exist within that location either. This would mean that instead of there being an iron-nickel core, as projected exists within the core of our planet, there would be but lines of gravitational waves passing through that one and one-half mile location. And the hypothetical, hydrogen to helium furnace heating our sun’s core would change to that of a mass contraction furnace, which heat energy would further maintain the mass contraction. Remember that the sun must expend 665 pounds of matter in form of gravitational waves every second in order to keep the planets in place, and our planet expends 0.00444 kg. per second in order to keep us where we are. This gravity thing ain’t free. The third possibility is that there is a mass that has formed within the core point area of our sun and planet having an alias of “Black hole�?. It might sound sort of convenient to have a black hole with which our planet, due to necessity, would surrounded rather than empty space but, then, what would limit such a black hole size? Why would it not gobble up the surrounding mass of the sun and planets it was in the center of, and why would it not restrict the sun and earth’s rotation, and mess up our orbital movement? After all, such a black hole would be in position to exert the greatest breaking action possible on any solar body. ************** |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 10,066
|
![]()
Hmm... he's a little bit confused. Sounds like he knows what he's talking about unless you know some elementary physics... This guy has forgotten the relationships between acceleration, velocity, and force.
Educated beyond his ability :Cheeky: |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 10,066
|
![]()
And the rock guy is just too funny. Put him on stage and charge admission.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 506
|
![]()
Where do you find this stuff, Joe?
:thumbs: :notworthy (okay, I see where it came from...so why are you the lucky one? :rolling: ) |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Gainesville
Posts: 1,224
|
![]() Quote:
Cheers Joe Meert |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 93
|
![]()
Wow. A little LSD can obviously have a profound effect.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The North
Posts: 400
|
![]()
Let me have a hit
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|