FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-18-2010, 09:41 AM   #11
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 5,187
Default

Jesus will not come!
There are THREE lies in Revelation 22 to prove it!
Go find them and see.
Julio is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 10:36 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: West Virginina
Posts: 4,349
Default

It will be like left for dead two except the zombies will be holding bibles and try to convert you (by eating you). Hey its all made up so i am just as right as anyone else.
WVIncagold is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 03:54 PM   #13
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by coconino View Post
Does anyone know of anything that has been written about Jesus's return ? What is it supposed to be like ? Does he just turn up and say "Take me to your leader ?" Where does he turn up ? Will it be obvious who he is ? Will the world be the same as it was seconds before his return ? How long does he stay ? What does he do ? How will we know its Jesus rather than one of the imposters he spoke about ? Do we kill him again ? Does he visit just earth ? Does anyone know why it has taken so long ?


Well, you can start by reading Zechariah 12-14.


Yeshua comes to deliver Israel during a period when all nations have invaded her over the Jerusalem Issue. Sadly, those nations will be destroyed and those supported it...and ofcourse those who chose to disregard his warnings about not choosing to repent of their sins. After that mankind will have what it always wanted....a Utopian world of peace, life and Liberty...and best of all...eternal life.
sugarhitman is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 07:13 PM   #14
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post

But, we still wait for the FIRST coming.
Chili is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 07:15 PM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

I think he came and comes and keeps coming. He's just "the way" and if we find 'a way' it will be to his credit.
Chili is offline  
Old 08-18-2010, 10:20 PM   #16
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 5,187
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
I think he came and comes and keeps coming. He's just "the way" and if we find 'a way' it will be to his credit.
Well, I still don't know what to say, honest.
What is this "thing" you call "the way", kindly?
Julio is offline  
Old 08-20-2010, 02:15 AM   #17
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: highlands
Posts: 145
Default

OK, well, here is the challenge. The apocalyptic stuff quoted above is obviously grist for the mill of the ultra-right evangelical fundamentalists. But what would a more mainstream Anglican or Protestant believe ? (I assume that all Christian denominations believe in Jesus' Second Coming). Does anyone know the less loony explanations ?

Also, is it possible that by talking of the "Son of Man" Jesus is not referring to himself ? That we are incorrectly attributing the apocalyptic stuff to Jesus' return ?
coconino is offline  
Old 08-20-2010, 05:22 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Texas, U.S.
Posts: 5,844
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by coconino View Post
Also, is it possible that by talking of the "Son of Man" Jesus is not referring to himself ? That we are incorrectly attributing the apocalyptic stuff to Jesus' return ?
Bart Ehrman makes this argument quite a bit in his books, that Jesus is a prophet announcing the coming Son of Man, a spiritual being of some sort residing between Heaven and Earth. I've looked in my bible for Son of Man references, and in many of them he could very well be talking about someone else, but in others it's not so clear.

It's also interesting to me that Son of Man is almost never used in the NT outside of the Gospels (with one exception, uttered by Stephen at his stoning.)
James Brown is offline  
Old 08-20-2010, 05:27 AM   #19
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: highlands
Posts: 145
Default

Thanks James: So if there is a possible confusion equating Jesus with the Son of Man; and if Jesus is simply quoting well established eschatological tradition, is there any other convincing evidence, aside from what Paul (or Acts) may say, to establish that Jesus was ever meant to return, or what that was meant to entail ?
coconino is offline  
Old 08-20-2010, 05:30 AM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Texas, U.S.
Posts: 5,844
Default

I'm not sure. What I do find significant is that in the first chronological books of the NT (meaning the epistles of Paul, etc.) there is no mention of Jesus "returning" or "coming again." Every mention of Jesus coming to Earth is written as if it will occur for the first time someday in the near future.

It's only when the Gospels and Acts are written do we find any mention of Jesus' second coming.
James Brown is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:51 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.