Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-18-2010, 09:41 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 5,187
|
Jesus will not come!
There are THREE lies in Revelation 22 to prove it! Go find them and see. |
08-18-2010, 10:36 AM | #12 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: West Virginina
Posts: 4,349
|
It will be like left for dead two except the zombies will be holding bibles and try to convert you (by eating you). Hey its all made up so i am just as right as anyone else.
|
08-18-2010, 03:54 PM | #13 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
|
Quote:
Well, you can start by reading Zechariah 12-14. Yeshua comes to deliver Israel during a period when all nations have invaded her over the Jerusalem Issue. Sadly, those nations will be destroyed and those supported it...and ofcourse those who chose to disregard his warnings about not choosing to repent of their sins. After that mankind will have what it always wanted....a Utopian world of peace, life and Liberty...and best of all...eternal life. |
|
08-18-2010, 07:13 PM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
|
08-18-2010, 07:15 PM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
I think he came and comes and keeps coming. He's just "the way" and if we find 'a way' it will be to his credit.
|
08-18-2010, 10:20 PM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 5,187
|
|
08-20-2010, 02:15 AM | #17 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: highlands
Posts: 145
|
OK, well, here is the challenge. The apocalyptic stuff quoted above is obviously grist for the mill of the ultra-right evangelical fundamentalists. But what would a more mainstream Anglican or Protestant believe ? (I assume that all Christian denominations believe in Jesus' Second Coming). Does anyone know the less loony explanations ?
Also, is it possible that by talking of the "Son of Man" Jesus is not referring to himself ? That we are incorrectly attributing the apocalyptic stuff to Jesus' return ? |
08-20-2010, 05:22 AM | #18 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Texas, U.S.
Posts: 5,844
|
Quote:
It's also interesting to me that Son of Man is almost never used in the NT outside of the Gospels (with one exception, uttered by Stephen at his stoning.) |
|
08-20-2010, 05:27 AM | #19 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: highlands
Posts: 145
|
Thanks James: So if there is a possible confusion equating Jesus with the Son of Man; and if Jesus is simply quoting well established eschatological tradition, is there any other convincing evidence, aside from what Paul (or Acts) may say, to establish that Jesus was ever meant to return, or what that was meant to entail ?
|
08-20-2010, 05:30 AM | #20 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Texas, U.S.
Posts: 5,844
|
I'm not sure. What I do find significant is that in the first chronological books of the NT (meaning the epistles of Paul, etc.) there is no mention of Jesus "returning" or "coming again." Every mention of Jesus coming to Earth is written as if it will occur for the first time someday in the near future.
It's only when the Gospels and Acts are written do we find any mention of Jesus' second coming. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|