FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-10-2008, 02:31 PM   #121
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meatros View Post
THIS (not your personal opinion) is what I have been questioning; ie, WHICH SOME BELIEVE SO.
Because there's no evidence of tampering. Innocent until proven guilty applies in all walks of my life; if you'd like to prove something to me, come to me with solid reasoning for it. Don't just tell me that literature was guarded by Christians in those days so it "must" have been tampered with.

Quote:
If you believe that some (scholars? Laymen? aliens) think that the TF is 100 percent authentic, then please provide evidence of this.
Why do I have to provide evidence that the literature is true? Isn't it the other way around?
SlowTrainComing is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 02:32 PM   #122
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
If you don't mind, I'll let STC translate it for you. After all, he's the one claiming expertise and superior knowledge on matters Josephan.

Jeffrey
can you quote me on that?
SlowTrainComing is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 02:33 PM   #123
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Equinox View Post
STC, did you notice that my post #112 was addressed to Jeff, not you (or are you a Jeff too?). you are welcome to answer it, but it really wasn't in opposition to your points.

Jeff, I know you supplied the quote, but we don't read greek. Just post the translation for us plebians, thanks. Let' not make things harder than they have to be. I'm another non-believer and sorry, I missed the translation if you posted it.

Everyone - I'm afraid I'll be gone camping for the weekend. Unless I discover an internet tree, I'll see y'all next week.><

Have a fun weekend-

Equinox
I know... I wanted to answer your claim, that's all

Have a fun trip and God bless.....
SlowTrainComing is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 02:34 PM   #124
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
What happened to "I will gladly provide my sources"?

Jeffrey
I qualified it by asking for the relevance. Since you refuse to post any arguments in English, as you must know full well that the vast majority of us don't read Greek, I've yet to see said relevance.
SlowTrainComing is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 02:39 PM   #125
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SlowTrainComing View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
If you don't mind, I'll let STC translate it for you. After all, he's the one claiming expertise and superior knowledge on matters Josephan.

Jeffrey
can you quote me on that?
So we shouldn't take anything you say about Josephus and what he says, and why others who have made counter claims to yours about him are wrong, seriously?

Jeffrey
Jeffrey Gibson is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 02:39 PM   #126
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SlowTrainComing View Post
...
Why do I have to provide evidence that the literature is true? Isn't it the other way around?
No it's not.

I think I am repeating myself. Christian apologists have imagined that there is a rule that says that ancient documents are presumed correct or intact unless there is evidence to the contrary. There is no such rule, and historians do not operate that way.

May I suggest that you slow down? This thread is a massive waste of time because you post numerous short statements, often with just an emotional reaction to another post, and, so far, have refused to give any citations for your sources.

It would help if you gave a complete justification for what you are saying: you believe that Jesus existed because there are sources A, B, C, D, validated by historians X,Y,Z, - or something concrete.

Does this make sense?
Toto is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 02:40 PM   #127
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SlowTrainComing View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
What happened to "I will gladly provide my sources"?

Jeffrey
I qualified it by asking for the relevance. Since you refuse to post any arguments in English, as you must know full well that the vast majority of us don't read Greek, I've yet to see said relevance.
Dodge three. Misrepresentation ("I qualified it") one.

Jeffrey
Jeffrey Gibson is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 02:42 PM   #128
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlowTrainComing View Post

I qualified it by asking for the relevance. Since you refuse to post any arguments in English, as you must know full well that the vast majority of us don't read Greek, I've yet to see said relevance.
Dodge three. Misrepresentation ("I qualified it") one.

Jeffrey
We can play this game all night, but until you show me the relevant need, you're just going to be left playing Mr. Intellectually Superior To All Of You on your own.
SlowTrainComing is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 02:42 PM   #129
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlowTrainComing View Post

can you quote me on that?
So we shouldn't take anything you say about Josephus and what he says, and why others who have made counter claims to yours about him are wrong, seriously?

Jeffrey
Really? I'm either fluent in Greek and the world's premier Josephan scholar or I've never heard of the guy?
SlowTrainComing is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 02:44 PM   #130
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
No it's not.

I think I am repeating myself. Christian apologists have imagined that there is a rule that says that ancient documents are presumed correct or intact unless there is evidence to the contrary. There is no such rule, and historians do not operate that way.
We have documents. You say they're not genuine. Let's hear why. It's that simple.

Quote:
Does this make sense?
No, your unapproachable intellect makes my red-state head spin. I'd bettah go check on the chilluns and get suppah reddy.
SlowTrainComing is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:24 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.