FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-28-2007, 02:26 PM   #11
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Minimalist View Post
I don't know, Sauron. This was what he asked.

Quote:
Questions:
Is this scenario contradicted by anything solid, i.e something other than the bible?

25 years of archaeological research which indicates that there was no Exodus ( and thus, no Moses, no Joseph, no Conquest, no Sojourn in the Desert) would not seem to leave a lot of room for the Levites.

Some people are still trying to breathe life back into that corpse. Finkelstein seems to have convinced his fellow archaeologists that "Israel" arose in Canaan at the end of the Bronze Age. Even Bill Dever agrees with him, now.
I see no reason to doubt what archaeologists find, but there's always a reason to be cautious when drawing conclusions from what is not found. And in this particular case there might be a kernel of truth in the story. That people were slaves in Egypt is not a remarkable claim. That the alleged slaves would have come from a nearby region is not a remarkable claim. That the Egyptians would release a large number of their slaves more or less willingly is however a bit strange. Seen from the Hebrew side it's such a strange story to make up about your own past. Claiming descendancy from slaves, as opposed to some mythical glorious past is weird and they can only do it by putting a wild heroic gloss on it with god himself stepping in to save the day when the shit hits the fan. It seems implausible that there weren't such stories circulating among the people before it was put into writing some 300-500 years after the alleged fact. I can't imagine the priests telling the people, one sunny day in the late bronze age, that they've just invented a history for them that nobody has ever heard of before.
Dreadnought is offline  
Old 07-28-2007, 02:27 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,808
Default

Read Finkelstein. He will put the tale in context. Based on 7th century BC realities, it makes a lot more sense.
Minimalist is offline  
Old 07-28-2007, 05:05 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,884
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
In his book "Who wrote the bible (or via: amazon.co.uk)" Richard Friedman casually suggests that only the Levite tribe were in captivity in Egypt. He doesn't go into much depth about it, but just drops this line of reasoning in passing. His reasons are that Egyptian names were not uncommon among Levites, but not among the other tribes. The Levites were without land of their own which fits with them being a later (re-)arrival. Also Levites commonly traced their ancestry to either Moses or Aaron.

What he doesn't mention explicitly, but which I think gives added plausibility to the scenario is that the Pentateuch is mostly written by Levites who naturally would emphasize their history and not neccesarily that of all the Jews.

The number of Levites leaving Egypt would be hard to estimate, but I doubt that there could be more than a few thousand and for the sake of argument we can assume that they went straight to Israel without messing about in the desert.

Having read this I found myself for the first time entertaining the possibility that Moses and the Exodus actually are historical. Questions:
Is this scenario contradicted by anything solid, i.e something other than the bible? Is there still evidence that should have been found for this (arguments from silence)? Does anyone know about a more in depth treatment of this hypothesis?
For hundreds of years, Egyptian conquests added lots of foreigners to the population of Egypt. Numerous foreign names are known to us in Egyptian literature and achaeological evidence. Many Canaanite gods and goddesses became popular in Egypt, Baal, Qadesh, and others.

But there are no Israelite names known from possible times of any Egyptian captivity, no mention of Yhwh. You would expect such things if there really were large numbers of Israelites in Egypt 430 years as claimed by the OT.

Again, Israel allegedly came to Egypt with a little over 70 people and left with 600,000 men of fighting age 430 years later. If so, you would expect that there would be a very heavy Egyptian nfluence on early Israelite culture. Language, tradition, pottery, et al. The early Israelites were typical Canaanites. Only Egyption weights and measures are notable in this regard, which you'd expect since Egypt was a major trade partner for centuries. I do not see any notable Egyptianisms in the Levite religious codes of Exodus, Numbers, Deuteronomy et al. These Levites did not have a tradition of life after death, which was the basic foundation of Egyptian religion for example. Their legal codes smack more of Hammurabi and Babylonia.

I see little evidence for Israel in Egypt where you would expect evidence. Early on, Egypt usually sents sons of local chiefs and sheiks to Egypt for education. Many of these men were proud of their status as we see in the Amarna letters, and quick to be hurt by percieved Egyptian slights.

I strongly believe that when Egyptian power in the region collapsed after Rameses VI, these semi-Egyptianized men became part of a reorganization of tribal groups in the area that gave us proto-Israelite tribal coalitions.

Hence distant rememberances of men connected somehow to Egypt.

CC
Cheerful Charlie is offline  
Old 07-28-2007, 05:10 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,884
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
The connection between the Hyksos and the Hebrews is confusing as the Egyptians portray the Hyksos as rulers for 100 years that were subsequently thrown out while the Hebrews claim they were slaves. If the Hebrews and the Hyksos were really one and the same it's remarkable that the Hebrews didn't describe themselves as the former rulers of Egypt in the bible. However Josephus does claim that the Hyksos were the Hebrews I think.

Anyway this is an entirely different hypothesis.
The other problem is that the Egyptians later invaded Retenu (Palestine) and destroyed Hyksos forts and cities. Hyksos do not fit exodus in anyway shape or form.

CC
Cheerful Charlie is offline  
Old 07-28-2007, 07:31 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,037
Default

I have heard that Israelite-style houses have been found at Pi-Raamses. Is there any truth to this claim?
Gullwind is offline  
Old 07-29-2007, 01:18 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, England
Posts: 6,947
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Minimalist View Post
Finkelstein seems to have convinced his fellow archaeologists that "Israel" arose in Canaan at the end of the Bronze Age. Even Bill Dever agrees with him, now.
That's interesting. In discussions, I often get Exodus believers try to dismiss Finkelstein by simply asserting that "Dever has proved him wrong" (without, of course, understanding what either Finkelstein or Deve actually says).

So do you have any quotes or references for Dever's change of mind and subsequent agreement with Finkelstein?
Dean Anderson is offline  
Old 07-29-2007, 06:07 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,884
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Anderson View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minimalist View Post
Finkelstein seems to have convinced his fellow archaeologists that "Israel" arose in Canaan at the end of the Bronze Age. Even Bill Dever agrees with him, now.
That's interesting. In discussions, I often get Exodus believers try to dismiss Finkelstein by simply asserting that "Dever has proved him wrong" (without, of course, understanding what either Finkelstein or Deve actually says).

So do you have any quotes or references for Dever's change of mind and subsequent agreement with Finkelstein?

Having several of Dever's books, I can tell you Dever agrees that exodus is not historical.

CC
Cheerful Charlie is offline  
Old 07-29-2007, 07:00 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
Is this scenario contradicted by anything solid . . . ?
If not, then I guess this much of the story might be true:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exodus 19:1
children of Israel were gone forth out of the land of Egypt
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 07-29-2007, 10:12 AM   #19
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheerful Charlie View Post
For hundreds of years, Egyptian conquests added lots of foreigners to the population of Egypt. Numerous foreign names are known to us in Egyptian literature and achaeological evidence. Many Canaanite gods and goddesses became popular in Egypt, Baal, Qadesh, and others.

But there are no Israelite names known from possible times of any Egyptian captivity, no mention of Yhwh. You would expect such things if there really were large numbers of Israelites in Egypt 430 years as claimed by the OT.

Again, Israel allegedly came to Egypt with a little over 70 people and left with 600,000 men of fighting age 430 years later. If so, you would expect that there would be a very heavy Egyptian nfluence on early Israelite culture. Language, tradition, pottery, et al. The early Israelites were typical Canaanites. Only Egyption weights and measures are notable in this regard, which you'd expect since Egypt was a major trade partner for centuries. I do not see any notable Egyptianisms in the Levite religious codes of Exodus, Numbers, Deuteronomy et al. These Levites did not have a tradition of life after death, which was the basic foundation of Egyptian religion for example. Their legal codes smack more of Hammurabi and Babylonia.
Thanks for this. Obviously I'm not wondering about the full numbers stated in the bible, but a small fraction of them. Regardless of numbers however one would expect a stronger Egyptian influence on religion and legal codes as the Levites mostly where the ones to define these. The lack of influence is a good point against.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheerful Charlie View Post
I see little evidence for Israel in Egypt where you would expect evidence. Early on, Egypt usually sents sons of local chiefs and sheiks to Egypt for education. Many of these men were proud of their status as we see in the Amarna letters, and quick to be hurt by percieved Egyptian slights.
I don't think we'd see much influence in Egypt by a relatively small group of Isrealites of low social standing. So this doesn't really say anything either way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheerful Charlie View Post
I strongly believe that when Egyptian power in the region collapsed after Rameses VI, these semi-Egyptianized men became part of a reorganization of tribal groups in the area that gave us proto-Israelite tribal coalitions.

Hence distant rememberances of men connected somehow to Egypt.
OK. I see your point here and as these men were of high standing their memories would have a larger impact on the collective memory than that of any old goat herder.
Dreadnought is offline  
Old 07-29-2007, 10:15 AM   #20
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Shaver View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
Is this scenario contradicted by anything solid . . . ?
If not, then I guess this much of the story might be true:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exodus 19:1
children of Israel were gone forth out of the land of Egypt
That about sums it up.
Dreadnought is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:29 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.