FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Elsewhere > ~Elsewhere~
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-03-2005, 07:35 PM   #51
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: 6th Circle of Hell
Posts: 1,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bible Thumper
Imagine a world ruled by Nazi's. Everyone's enslaved. Many starve to death in camps. Would you, being under current enslavement, curse God? Now, suppose God destroys the Nazi's. What would you do? Curse, or offer praise that God destroyed the sinful man? Well?
Maybe that's the problem, see, God didn't kill the Nazi's, the Allied powers did. If it wasn't for that group of people they would have continued their genocide. That's how it works in real life.

Sorry to continue the off-topicness.
Spaz is offline  
Old 03-03-2005, 07:48 PM   #52
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Harrisburg PA. Home of Intelligent Judges.
Posts: 547
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TySixtus
Okay, now watch this. Plants bearing fruit require sunlight. While you are right that there are some 'plants' that don't require sunlight, they also don't 'bear fruit'. So you can't have it both ways.


You say god already created light. Well, see here is the problem. "Light" comes from these things out in space called "stars". It's really long and complicated but trust me on this: stars had to come first. Ergo, this shit is out of order.

So either god 'created' light twice, first as an ambiguous entity and then as a product of stars or...... (wait for it!)....

None of this shit ever happened!

Ty
Maybe he created the plants on the third day, knowing he was going to create light the next day, figuring they'd last a day. Hey, coulda happened. :huh:

Of course, that assumes a seven day Creation Week. He couldn't wait millions of years for the sun to come up. Those plants woulda died and become ... umm...fossils.

SI
Spanish_Inquisitor is offline  
Old 03-03-2005, 07:58 PM   #53
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,283
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bible Thumper
Genesis, as opposed to pagans, romans, grecians and even scientists up to the 20th century, has proven to be an accuurate accounting of Creation!
In order to avoid treading on already mentioned ground, here's one new question to consider: Are you aware of the evolutionary history of cetaceans, yes or no? If yes, how can you possibly make the above statement with a straight face?
Quote:
Why do you and people like you have such a hard time with that?
Because we're members of the reality-based community, not the fantasy-based community like you?
Quote:
Can't you just go back tot he link I supplied? It mirrors everything Earth scientists and Cosmologists have said, and reflects clearly my knowledge, as well!
Indeed it mirrors a profound ignorance, but that probably wasn't the point you thought you were making.
Weltall is offline  
Old 03-03-2005, 08:01 PM   #54
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 1,279
Default

The link isn't working for me. God must hate his own supporters.
Dragon is offline  
Old 03-03-2005, 08:12 PM   #55
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Some where in the space-time continuum
Posts: 131
Default

God made two great lights-the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars. The last time I checked the moon was not a light, Only a reflection. Poor goat herder`s couldn`t tell the difference! :rolling:
unassimilated is offline  
Old 03-03-2005, 08:16 PM   #56
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: 6th Circle of Hell
Posts: 1,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by unassimilated
God made two great lights-the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars. The last time I checked the moon was not a light, Only a reflection. Poor goat herder`s couldn`t tell the difference! :rolling:
Not to mention that the sun and other stars are the same thing just one's closer than the rest.
Spaz is offline  
Old 03-03-2005, 08:23 PM   #57
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 619
Default DING DING DING DING... we have a winner

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bible Thumper
Amen. God makes it His will and desire to destroy the sinful man He created!

Imagine a world ruled by Nazi's. Everyone's enslaved. Many starve to death in camps. Would you, being under current enslavement, curse God? Now, suppose God destroys the Nazi's. What would you do? Curse, or offer praise that God destroyed the sinful man? Well?
That TBT is the most incoherent assembly of words in the english language i have seen in quite a while...

I would not curse god for the nazis because i'd rather engage in more fruitful endevours than blaming an imaginary deity for anything... that's externalizing guilt and responsibility... i'd rather think (yeah i know that's a foreign concept to some) about why nazis came to power and from that figure out how to defeat them... without wasting my time, life or anyone elses's in a fruitless wait for interference by a supernatural being that if indeed real should have not allowed nazis into power in the first place...

then, once the nazis were defeated i'd look at all the ways to prevent that from happening again which would no doubt include stronger separation of church and state and stronger secular institutions...

PS - your post is also a distortion of scripture since according to it your gos did indeed destroy people regardless of guilt... in other words I as an innocent bystander in your scenarion would not have been around to thnk or not thank anyone since i would have also been destroyed
LeeBuhrul is offline  
Old 03-03-2005, 08:34 PM   #58
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Don't you wish your boy friend got drunk like me,
Posts: 7,808
Question Does this thread really have a point?

Is this a good time to pipe in with:

<Edited. No, it's not.>

Just wondering...
Spenser is offline  
Old 03-03-2005, 10:06 PM   #59
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 5,914
Default

And why is it better to trust a millennia-old book of myths written during an era when they knew just the tiniest fraction of what we know today, instead of modern science? This doesn't add up, and I'm sure you know it. And that is why I am seriously starting to doubt that you're nothing but an atheist (or similar) trying to be funny.
_Naturalist_ is offline  
Old 03-03-2005, 11:25 PM   #60
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: calgary, ab
Posts: 690
Default funny atheists

AgentSmith: I am seriously starting to doubt that you're nothing but an atheist (or similar) trying to be funny.

I think that a lot of wannabe theists, without knowing it, can become quite 'funny'. Especially when, year after year, science reveals how preposterous their dogmas are. If one has invested one's time, energy, and life in something that is increasingly impossible to defend logically, one would probably resort to increasingly hysteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerical defenses. It stiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiil doesn't matter, however; holding down keys or not, one would stiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil be just as wrong.



:devil1:
regis is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:41 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.