zaitzeff

so, what have the members of this forum come to believe re
I Cor 15:3ff being an interpolation or a Pauline adoption of
something pre-Pauline? I am currently reading the essay by
Price arguing that 3ff is post-Pauline.

One reason that this subject interests me is that I have doubts about
a substitionary atonement and I Cor 15 is the only place in which Paul or
some person says that Christ died for our sins. Elsewhere, Paul uses other language.

Toto

The last thread on that topic: Emails between Layman and Robert Price which got off topic very quickly.

also

Is 1 Cor. 15:3-11 an interpolation?

I think that the case for the reference to the 500 bretheren being an interpolation or a marginal note that got copied into the text is very strong. The case for the rest of it being an interpolation is good but harder to show.

zaitzeff

I am pretty weird, as a liberal Christian with reasons to doubt the
substitutionary atonement theory. If substitutionary atonement is a mistake,
then, I cor 15:3ff being an interpolation absolves paul of having taught this mistake.