Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-08-2007, 10:11 AM | #31 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
More likely, it shows that Josephus is sometimes correct.
|
05-08-2007, 10:11 AM | #32 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 79
|
|
05-08-2007, 10:34 AM | #33 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
|
|
05-08-2007, 10:44 AM | #34 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
|
|
05-08-2007, 10:47 AM | #36 |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
It is a pity that Josephus did not write about Jesus, where he lived, was buried or resurrected, perhaps the archaeologists would have been able to find something.
Josephus wrote about Herod and John the Baptist, why in the world did he not write a single word about the Jesus of the NT? I think the NTis correct when it claims that Joseph was the supposed earthly father of Jesus, they are possibly refering to Flavius Josephus, since it appears that it was from Josephus' works that Jesus was conceived. |
05-08-2007, 10:50 AM | #37 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
|
|
05-08-2007, 10:56 AM | #38 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
|
|
05-08-2007, 12:03 PM | #39 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Allen, Tx
Posts: 604
|
|
05-08-2007, 12:19 PM | #40 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|