Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-29-2004, 08:56 AM | #131 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: England
Posts: 735
|
Errrrr - Everest isn't a volcano.
It IS impossible for a (non-volcanic) mountain to grow from less than the height of Ararat to 29,000 ft in 4,000 years. So the possibilities are - the flood was restricted to the middle east - which was the "known world" as far as the ancient Israelites were concerned - God miraculously altered the earth's geography AFTER the flood - raised mountains etc, flew kangaroos to Australia and so on. 2nd is obviously not disprovable. Unfortunately the Bible doesn't provide any evidence for it. 1st would seem more probable and actually has some non-Biblical evidence to back it up. By the way, the flood seems to have spared the pyramids (which predate the flood by several centuries) - explain that! |
01-29-2004, 08:57 AM | #132 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
|
Quote:
|
|
01-29-2004, 09:08 AM | #133 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Quote:
And, as noted above, Everest isn't a volcano. |
|
01-29-2004, 09:10 AM | #134 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
|
Quote:
|
|
01-29-2004, 09:14 AM | #135 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,952
|
Yup, and don't give me the crap about it being impossible. A volcano in Mexico grew from flat ground to 1000 feet in a couple weeks.
Your fundamental lack of understanding of geology, and science in general, is wearing thin. Makes me sad that you'll cling to this notion without even trying to educate yourself on the relevant topics, beyond a cursory examination so you can at least participate in the discussions. Please go read a book (other than the bible; i'd say you've read that one enough). In Magus55's defense, yes, a volcano did spontaneously eurupt in mexico (can't recall the name of it, but this is surprisingly recent in history), however, as many people pointed out above, everest ain't volcanic. :banghead: |
01-29-2004, 09:19 AM | #136 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
|
Quote:
|
|
01-29-2004, 09:26 AM | #137 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Quote:
And all the while, hiding his mountain-growing activity from civilizations around the world, none of which recorded the miraculous growing of these mountain ranges, and also hiding it from modern geologists, none of which have detected any evidence that the world's many high peaks have all grown miraculously by thousands of feet in the last few thousand years. |
|
01-29-2004, 09:27 AM | #138 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: A world less bright without WinAce.
Posts: 7,482
|
Nice. In recap:
Magus: No, this could happen because a volcano did it! Us: But Everest isn't volcanic. Magus: Yeah, but my example is totally irrelevant! Because goddidit. Please, don't try to hide behind science or pretend your views are rational if a couple posts later you'll just take everything back and admit your beliefs have nothing to do with reality. |
01-29-2004, 09:31 AM | #139 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
|
Quote:
|
|
01-29-2004, 09:33 AM | #140 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: A world less bright without WinAce.
Posts: 7,482
|
One more question:
Don't the mountains show a gradual rise? Isn't there evidence showing that they've grown only infintesimally over time, no 10,000 feet in 4,000 years? Or is this just the 'God lied and gave it the appearance of age' bit? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|