FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-29-2004, 08:56 AM   #131
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: England
Posts: 735
Default

Errrrr - Everest isn't a volcano.

It IS impossible for a (non-volcanic) mountain to grow from less than the height of Ararat to 29,000 ft in 4,000 years.

So the possibilities are

- the flood was restricted to the middle east - which was the "known world" as far as the ancient Israelites were concerned

- God miraculously altered the earth's geography AFTER the flood - raised mountains etc, flew kangaroos to Australia and so on.

2nd is obviously not disprovable. Unfortunately the Bible doesn't provide any evidence for it.

1st would seem more probable and actually has some non-Biblical evidence to back it up.

By the way, the flood seems to have spared the pyramids (which predate the flood by several centuries) - explain that!
exile is offline  
Old 01-29-2004, 08:57 AM   #132
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
Yup, and don't give me the crap about it being impossible. A volcano in Mexico grew from flat ground to 1000 feet in a couple weeks.
Even if you're right (please give a reference), could you please provide the chapter in the bible which describes this earth-shaking events in detail? Or do you think nobody found these events worth mentioning? And please don't quote the verse about Peleg (to which Jim Larmore already referred) - it's after all only a single verse and thus not at all appropriate for these great changes in the shape of the earth.
Sven is offline  
Old 01-29-2004, 09:08 AM   #133
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
Yup, and don't give me the crap about it being impossible. A volcano in Mexico grew from flat ground to 1000 feet in a couple weeks.
While true, note that it would take a lot more mass to grow a 28,000 foot mountain to 29,000 feet. Think about it.

And, as noted above, Everest isn't a volcano.
Mageth is offline  
Old 01-29-2004, 09:10 AM   #134
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by macaskil
Errrrr - Everest isn't a volcano.

It IS impossible for a (non-volcanic) mountain to grow from less than the height of Ararat to 29,000 ft in 4,000 years.

And what evidence do you have that this isn't possible? Because we don't currently observe it today? If there was extreme amounts of tectonic activity during the flood, it most certaintly is possible. And i'm not saying the exact age was 4000 years ago. I just believe in a young creation, not necessarily exactly 6000 years ago, or that the Earth is the age of 6000 years.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 01-29-2004, 09:14 AM   #135
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,952
Default

Yup, and don't give me the crap about it being impossible. A volcano in Mexico grew from flat ground to 1000 feet in a couple weeks.

Your fundamental lack of understanding of geology, and science in general, is wearing thin. Makes me sad that you'll cling to this notion without even trying to educate yourself on the relevant topics, beyond a cursory examination so you can at least participate in the discussions. Please go read a book (other than the bible; i'd say you've read that one enough).

In Magus55's defense, yes, a volcano did spontaneously eurupt in mexico (can't recall the name of it, but this is surprisingly recent in history), however, as many people pointed out above, everest ain't volcanic. :banghead:
Plognark is offline  
Old 01-29-2004, 09:19 AM   #136
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Plognark
Yup, and don't give me the crap about it being impossible. A volcano in Mexico grew from flat ground to 1000 feet in a couple weeks.

Your fundamental lack of understanding of geology, and science in general, is wearing thin. Makes me sad that you'll cling to this notion without even trying to educate yourself on the relevant topics, beyond a cursory examination so you can at least participate in the discussions. Please go read a book (other than the bible; i'd say you've read that one enough).

In Magus55's defense, yes, a volcano did spontaneously eurupt in mexico (can't recall the name of it, but this is surprisingly recent in history), however, as many people pointed out above, everest ain't volcanic. :banghead:
It doesn't matter how geology works. Yes geology may say that by natural methods, Everest can not grow thousands of feet in a few thousand years. But who ever said this was a natural event? God isn't bound by geology. He can do what geology says can't happen.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 01-29-2004, 09:26 AM   #137
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
It doesn't matter how geology works. Yes geology may say that by natural methods, Everest can not grow thousands of feet in a few thousand years. But who ever said this was a natural event? God isn't bound by geology. He can do what geology says can't happen.
And, once again, God had to have waved his magic wand and caused Everest (and the hundreds if not thousands of other peaks taller than Ararat) to sprout like so many wild onions in spring, all so that Magus et al can defend an obvious myth as history.

And all the while, hiding his mountain-growing activity from civilizations around the world, none of which recorded the miraculous growing of these mountain ranges, and also hiding it from modern geologists, none of which have detected any evidence that the world's many high peaks have all grown miraculously by thousands of feet in the last few thousand years.
Mageth is offline  
Old 01-29-2004, 09:27 AM   #138
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: A world less bright without WinAce.
Posts: 7,482
Default

Nice. In recap:

Magus: No, this could happen because a volcano did it!

Us: But Everest isn't volcanic.

Magus: Yeah, but my example is totally irrelevant! Because goddidit.


Please, don't try to hide behind science or pretend your views are rational if a couple posts later you'll just take everything back and admit your beliefs have nothing to do with reality.
Angrillori is offline  
Old 01-29-2004, 09:31 AM   #139
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
It doesn't matter how geology works. Yes geology may say that by natural methods, Everest can not grow thousands of feet in a few thousand years. But who ever said this was a natural event? God isn't bound by geology. He can do what geology says can't happen.
I again have to ask why specifically this miracle out of God's countless miracles isn't mentioned in the bible.
Sven is offline  
Old 01-29-2004, 09:33 AM   #140
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: A world less bright without WinAce.
Posts: 7,482
Default

One more question:

Don't the mountains show a gradual rise? Isn't there evidence showing that they've grown only infintesimally over time, no 10,000 feet in 4,000 years?

Or is this just the 'God lied and gave it the appearance of age' bit?
Angrillori is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:47 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.