Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Angyson · 09-22-2004, 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diabolical Vengeance

Can I take the third option: Viking funeral pyre for me

Stop wining and drink your hemlock like a man.

Barefoot Bree · 09-23-2004, 05:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angyson

The moderators have wisely set up a new thread under the heading :
The Nuremberg Trials.

Hit the button For Angyson's Threads to locate it as the classification system here is a puzzle to me.

The thread is located in the Political Discussions (PD) forum. Please take all discussion of that subject, including discussion about the discussion, to that thread.

Thank you.

Angyson · 09-23-2004, 11:02 AM

Amen !

09-23-2004, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angyson

You are deliberately misquoting me. I never said the Halocost is OK by me.
Post the link if you can. You are misleading and malicious and that is despicable in my books.

Since this isn't a political point, but a question of veracity, I will add to this thread. Hope that's OK, mods.

First, I already gave the link. I will now give it again. Here it is:
http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.p...41#post1834441

And this is the actual quote from the post. I agree that it doesn't say exactly "OK by me", that was a paraphrase.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angyson

Nostradamus predicted the arrival of Hisler. The bible predicted the arrival of the German nation in a conflict with the Jews. If the Holocust [I hate that word ] was God's will for the Hebrew nation, so be it. No, I do not have any sympathy if it was God's will. I believe it was.

(Emphasis added by me)

JEST2ASK · 09-23-2004, 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angyson

Amen !

I prefer the Trek equivilent

Make It So

I am interested more now to see the polling results... than a defense of the actions of the German people during WW-II (

not 11):Cheeky:

Angyson · 09-24-2004, 06:17 AM

we'd pick the gas, because you wait in more comfort and are in better shape to take advantage of any escape opportunity.

Now, are you ever going to get on with a point? <removed>

Now my philosophical question to you is this : When the State is overpopulated by dogs and cats and cannot afford to feed them, nobody objects to euthenizing them. So when the State lacks living space and all its citizens are rationed to 600 calories a day, is the State justified in starving or euthanizing some of its citizens ? If not, why not ?

<removed>

Angyson · 09-24-2004, 06:55 AM

it is going to be a hotly debated topic if the critics can contain themselves while the defense is making it's case and not interrupt the presentation.

Unfortunately, people just assumed that anyone defending a client necessarily shares the views of that client and started heckling. I never got to finish my presentation for the defense. The moderator closed the thread saying I was off topic.

Angyson · 09-24-2004, 06:57 AM

The thread is located in the Political Discussions (PD) forum. Please take all discussion of that subject, including discussion about the discussion, to that thread.

Thank you.

Done.

Angyson · 09-24-2004, 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cajela

Since this isn't a political point, but a question of veracity, I will add to this thread. Hope that's OK, mods.

First, I already gave the link. I will now give it again. Here it is:
http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.p...41#post1834441

And this is the actual quote from the post. I agree that it doesn't say exactly "OK by me", that was a paraphrase.

(Emphasis added by me)

And your point is ?

Angyson · 09-24-2004, 07:07 AM

I am interested more now to see the polling results... than a defense of the actions of the German people during WW-II .

They appear to be split about 50/50.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

09-23-2004, 11:02 AM	#93
Angyson Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Ontario, Canada Posts: 983	Amen !

09-24-2004, 06:17 AM	#96
Angyson Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Ontario, Canada Posts: 983	we'd pick the gas, because you wait in more comfort and are in better shape to take advantage of any escape opportunity. Now, are you ever going to get on with a point? <removed> Now my philosophical question to you is this : When the State is overpopulated by dogs and cats and cannot afford to feed them, nobody objects to euthenizing them. So when the State lacks living space and all its citizens are rationed to 600 calories a day, is the State justified in starving or euthanizing some of its citizens ? If not, why not ? <removed>

09-24-2004, 06:55 AM	#97
Angyson Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Ontario, Canada Posts: 983	it is going to be a hotly debated topic if the critics can contain themselves while the defense is making it's case and not interrupt the presentation. Unfortunately, people just assumed that anyone defending a client necessarily shares the views of that client and started heckling. I never got to finish my presentation for the defense. The moderator closed the thread saying I was off topic.

09-24-2004, 06:57 AM	#98
Angyson Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Ontario, Canada Posts: 983	The thread is located in the Political Discussions (PD) forum. Please take all discussion of that subject, including discussion about the discussion, to that thread. Thank you. Done.

09-24-2004, 07:07 AM	#100
Angyson Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Ontario, Canada Posts: 983	I am interested more now to see the polling results... than a defense of the actions of the German people during WW-II . They appear to be split about 50/50.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.