![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#21 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: North Eastern United States
Posts: 3,383
|
![]()
In string theory, universes do not "crash" into eachother. They interact in such a way that another universe is created. There is no "disturbance" to either of the interacting universes (that is postulated to my knowledge). Also, these universes do not "expand" into eachother necessarily.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,210
|
![]() Quote:
I say god is logically impossible. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4,635
|
![]() Quote:
Furthermore, if 1 is true then it refutes premises 6a-c and your conclusion. A universe in which no God exists, no God can have knowledge of, and no God can influence is a logically possible universe. Note that any argument against this universe being logically possible counts equally against your premise 3 that God is logically possible. Thus, according to your premise 1, this no-Gods-allowed universe exist. The existence of this universe directly contradicts 6a-c and 7. The fact that your premise 1 implies your conclusions and conclusions that directly refute them, seems to demostrate that your first premise not only is not supported, but logically absurd. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,088
|
![]()
again, based on your origional post,
since (2) says "every logically possible being exists," then (3) The Invisible Pink Unicorn exists. You can use this argument to justify ANYTHING, therefor it fails. Please insert $.50 to continue. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|