FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-05-2006, 12:40 AM   #81
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
Or are those arguing for an HJ wanting the next step of people falling on their knees and asking Jeebus into their hearts?
It wasn't quite ironic, (sarcastic?) because is this not a classic evangelical approach - like what Campus Crusade for Christ does?

I do favour the approach of Freke and Gandy - that a true Christian (tm) is actually a mythicist!

It is probably a jump too far to change a xian into an atheist for most, an intermediate step of a gnostic mythic heroic xianity is a logical place to go to for xians. That way they can be as religious as they want and lose the fundamentals stuff! William James Varieties was interesting on this!

And if xians look carefully at what they say and do and believe, the concepts of mystery, of communion, of god with us, are very important!

HJism should be seen as a heresy, a clumsy misunderstanding!


So for me mythicism allows me to understand my personal experience as a pentecostal - of a quiet, holiness type - as xianity playing some beautiful hymns about our experience, of touching archetypes and dreams in us, but to see this as a facet of being human, without externalising it into a god figure.

If there were a Jesus figure he is more likely to have been a teacher of righteousness or an earlier priest figure - not the classic HJ about 0 -33 CE executed by Pilate. But a central character in a play seems most likely (listening NOT reading!)

We really do need to get a timeline in place, clearly showing what ideas came when!
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 05-05-2006, 12:41 AM   #82
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

OK. Sorry to have been so rude.

Vorkosigan
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 05-05-2006, 12:48 AM   #83
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 6,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McDuffie
That first nudge away from the being a JMer to an HJer came in the form of a realization I had that all of the JMers I knew were terrified that if they admitted Jesus existed, they might then be forced to admit him into their hearts.
From all you wrote above, this sounds more like projection to me. Because, seriously, the fear you describe sounds nutty and not very likely to occur in every single member of this group of people you know.

What's with this "into their hearts?" Why would you use those words? That's evangelical lingo.
blastula is offline  
Old 05-05-2006, 12:50 AM   #84
McD
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pueblo, CO
Posts: 1,794
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blastula
From all you wrote above, this sounds more like projection to me. Because, seriously, the fear you describe sounds nutty and not very likely to occur in every single member of this group of people you know.

What with this "into their hearts?" Why would you use those words? That's evangelical lingo.
This is the dumbest thing I have read all day, and I have been reading all day.
McD is offline  
Old 05-05-2006, 12:51 AM   #85
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McDuffie
. . .
3) A third reason was the fact that literally 100% of the MJers that I personally knew -- while I was an MJer -- would not even consider for the briefest second the merest possibilty that there could have been a historical Jesus. After talking, at great length, to many of them, over weeks, months and in one or two cases years, it occurred to me that their anger -- and it was anger -- at the suggestion that their conclusion might possibly be incorrect was based in fear. Indeed, several of them admitted -- and many more of them came close to admitting -- that it was because the next step from the historical Jesus the man is the Biblical Jesus the Lord. It was fear that was at the root of the their anger. Fear that was keeping them from considering other possibilities. I had no such fear, so I was open to exploring other avenues.

. . .

And you also have to understand how these conversations went. It was MJer to MJer, with me saying something like "Well, let's say Jesus did exist--" that's about all I could get out. Around some of these guys, I couldn't even suggest that Eusebius didn't pen the Testimonium Flavianum (from scratch) the reference to James found in the Jewish War, the reference to Chrestus in the Twelve Caesars and the reference to Chrestus or Christus in the Annals. Even if I mentioned an author that wasn't "approved" like Hans Conzelmann or Fr. Raymond Brown, I would get the business.

. . .
McD
With all due respect, you are quoting anonymous sources, so it's hard to check. I don't know these people and I can't imagine what their motivation would be. I suspect that you have misinterpreted the source of their anger, if it was anger, but I have no way of checking.

I can imagine someone getting angry at a friend who wants to accept an obvious fraud like the Testamonium, and there are probably some people who are so angry at Christianity that citing a Christian author would set them off, or your friends may have been so convinced of their beliefs that they regarded you as a nutcase, the way scientists get angry at creationists. And there may be people who think that only proving that Jesus is a myth can convince other people to give up Christianity.

But to suggest that most mythicists are afraid of a HJ because the next step would be for them to accept Jesus "into their hearrs" is just slander.
Toto is offline  
Old 05-05-2006, 12:52 AM   #86
McD
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pueblo, CO
Posts: 1,794
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan
OK. Sorry to have been so rude.

Vorkosigan
Well, I don't want you to pity me because I am a drugged out zombie.

I do stick by the basics of what I said, just give me a little break in the wording, and I equally apologize. I wasn't going to, until I reread that post way, way up there. I was concentrating on that second to the last one, not the one-- you know.

Ah n/m.

Peace.
McD is offline  
Old 05-05-2006, 12:53 AM   #87
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 6,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McDuffie
This is the dumbest thing I have read all day, and I have been reading all day.
What? You're incapable of projection? But you are capable of mind reading?
blastula is offline  
Old 05-05-2006, 12:53 AM   #88
McD
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pueblo, CO
Posts: 1,794
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
But to suggest that most mythicists are afraid of a HJ because the next step would be for them to accept Jesus "into their hearrs" is just slander.
It would be if that's what I am suggesting, but it isnt'. I have never suggested anything even close to that, at any point, in my entire life, in any medium. Ever.
McD is offline  
Old 05-05-2006, 12:54 AM   #89
McD
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pueblo, CO
Posts: 1,794
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blastula
What you're incapable of projection? But you are capable of mind reading?
Ok, you topped it. That is the dumbest thing I have read all day.

Wanna try to top it?
McD is offline  
Old 05-05-2006, 12:57 AM   #90
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 6,070
Default

Yeah. Here's another. I call bullshit on your entire story about MJers fearing believing in Jesus. It stinks. I don't buy it. It's ludicrous and it taints whatever else you have to say.

You can call me stupid again, but you'll still smell just as bad.
blastula is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:24 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.