FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-09-2007, 10:08 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Wolf Pit, England, old chap, what?
Posts: 1,627
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stinger View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rigel View Post

THAT statement is the height of arrogance. Typical christian delusion of superiority, that they have some inside information that others don't get.

Well WE DO GET IT AND REJECT IT. Your bible is so full of inaccuracies and contradictions that no competent high school student would have written it, let alone the supposed omniscient and omnipotent ruler and creator of the universe.

If you are happy wallowing in your ignorance and superstition, so be it. Just don't expect thinking people to swallow it hook, line and sinker.
I'm okay with what Ksen said. I didn't find it arrogant. I found it far more honest than most creationists that I know. We all have different standards. You have to accept the fact that millions and millions of people believe that they have a personal relationship with God.

Now, I started life off as a fundie, then become agnostic, and now am an athiest. For me, this is because I haven't found enough evidence to satisfy myself that there is a god. But, I don't find the reason to belittle people who have different standards of evidence than I do.
Yeah, I'm agreeing with Stinger here. Depending on attitude, it's not usually arrogant to state what you honestly believe. I personally don't believe in Bible god. I don't rule out the possibility of some higher being. If God exists, I am also quite happy to have my own personal relationship with her - but she hasn't had the need to talk to me yet. No problem.
Wolfie is offline  
Old 08-09-2007, 10:18 AM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Northern California
Posts: 7,558
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigers! View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post
I would be willing to become a Christian if certain kinds of evidence of my choice became available. Would fundamentalist Christians be willing to give up Christianity based upon any kind of evidence?
Not any kind of evidence Johnny but rather that "certain kinds of evidence of my choice became available."
It's not about choice, it's about what's necessary to change your mind. People do not decide 'my standard of evidence is going to be X because I'm an arrogant bastard who wants to rub it in God's face that I don't believe in him', they assess their standard of evidence and report.
trendkill is offline  
Old 08-09-2007, 10:27 AM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 3,095
Default

The fact that people are only unable to tell the difference between God talking and some guy claiming that God told him to tell us stuff when it comes to the religion they were raised under should provoke significant suspicion in any one. Protestants don't believe Mohommad or Joseph Smith, Muslims don't believe David Koresh or L. Ron Hubbard, etc. It certainly does seem arrogant to think 'I'm not like those other people who stupidly believe that those guys actually communicated with God'.
Selsaral is offline  
Old 08-09-2007, 12:20 PM   #24
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 317
Default

Come on. Statements like the one made by ksen about Johnny's lack of evidence are no different that others made by christians to non-believers. They act like they have some superior knowledge and pity the poor heathens that are not "saved". Maybe some people are not willing to base their lives on a violent book of fairy tales written thousands of years ago by a bunch of goat herders.

These statements are condescending and arrogant. They say things like "I used to have doubts and be confused like you, then I found jesus".

If you want to accept evidence like Virgin Mary's face in a grilled cheese sandwich or some other nonsense, great. Don't act like nontheists are "confused" because they don't swallow such bunk.
Rigel is offline  
Old 08-09-2007, 12:31 PM   #25
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 15,946
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rigel View Post
Come on. Statements like the one made by ksen about Johnny's lack of evidence are no different that others made by christians to non-believers. They act like they have some superior knowledge and pity the poor heathens that are not "saved".
You entirely misread what I wrote.

I wasn't saying I had superior knowledge. I said the evidence I do have is sufficient for me. That's it.

I have no idea what evidence Johnny has considered. But I do know from reading his threads that whatever evidence he has seen and considered has not been sufficient for him to accept that the God of the bible exists.

That's not me being condescending to him.

Quote:
These statements are condescending and arrogant. They say things like "I used to have doubts and be confused like you, then I found jesus".
That's not even in the same neighborhood to what I said.

I'm not sure why you are reacting the way you are to my posts. But whatever just know that I don't have the attitude you are describing.

Quote:
If you want to accept evidence like Virgin Mary's face in a grilled cheese sandwich or some other nonsense, great. Don't act like nontheists are "confused" because they don't swallow such bunk.
Erm, I don't accept things like Mary's face in a grilled cheese sandwich. That's a Catholic idiosyncracy.

And the only way I'd swallow that is after chewing it up and downing it with some milk.
ksen is offline  
Old 08-09-2007, 12:32 PM   #26
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 15,946
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Selsaral View Post
The fact that people are only unable to tell the difference between God talking and some guy claiming that God told him to tell us stuff when it comes to the religion they were raised under should provoke significant suspicion in any one.
I wasn't raised a christian. I was raised by parents ambivalent towards religion.
ksen is offline  
Old 08-09-2007, 12:37 PM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 3,095
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ksen View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Selsaral View Post
The fact that people are only unable to tell the difference between God talking and some guy claiming that God told him to tell us stuff when it comes to the religion they were raised under should provoke significant suspicion in any one.
I wasn't raised a christian. I was raised by parents ambivalent towards religion.
My statement applies to the vast, vast majority of believers and is backed up by endless anthropological and ethnographic data. I also was raised by secular parents, but in a Christian-dominated nation and even as an atheist I at first glance find Christian concepts much more 'normal' than menstrual blood magic, cargo cults, termite oracles, witchcraft, and drug-induced trips to the spirit world. It takes a village (or a culture) to raise a child.

Would you like to explain why you don't seem to see a difference between God telling us something and some guy writing in an ancient book that God told him to tell us something, and how that same view works on Islam, Mormonism, The Moonies, and the rest?
Selsaral is offline  
Old 08-09-2007, 12:43 PM   #28
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 317
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ksen View Post

You entirely misread what I wrote.

I wasn't saying I had superior knowledge. I said the evidence I do have is sufficient for me. That's it.
In that case, my apologies.
Rigel is offline  
Old 08-09-2007, 12:45 PM   #29
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 15,946
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Selsaral View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ksen View Post

I wasn't raised a christian. I was raised by parents ambivalent towards religion.
My statement applies to the vast, vast majority of believers and is backed up by endless anthropological and ethnographic data. I also was raised by secular parents, but in a Christian-dominated nation and even as an atheist I at first glance find Christian concepts much more 'normal' than menstrual blood magic, cargo cults, termite oracles, witchcraft, and drug-induced trips to the spirit world. It takes a village (or a culture) to raise a child.

Would you like to explain why you don't seem to see a difference between God tell us something and some guy writing in an ancient book that God told him to tell us something, and how that same view works on Islam, Mormonism, The Moonies, and the rest?
I suppose to those outside christianity it looks like we are asking for special pleading and I guess to some degree we are. :huh:

All I can say right now is that I rely on the tradition I have been taught that the bible is God's communication to Mankind given through some other men. Was it divine dictation? I don't think so.

Why do I accept my ancient guys and reject those from Islam, the Mormons, and the Moonies? I reject them because they depart from what's been written in the New Testament.
ksen is offline  
Old 08-09-2007, 12:45 PM   #30
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 317
Default

ksen- Out of curiosity, what evidence is sufficient for you?

EDIT- crossed posts
Rigel is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:26 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.