Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-09-2007, 10:08 AM | #21 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Wolf Pit, England, old chap, what?
Posts: 1,627
|
Quote:
|
||
08-09-2007, 10:18 AM | #22 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Northern California
Posts: 7,558
|
Quote:
|
|
08-09-2007, 10:27 AM | #23 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 3,095
|
The fact that people are only unable to tell the difference between God talking and some guy claiming that God told him to tell us stuff when it comes to the religion they were raised under should provoke significant suspicion in any one. Protestants don't believe Mohommad or Joseph Smith, Muslims don't believe David Koresh or L. Ron Hubbard, etc. It certainly does seem arrogant to think 'I'm not like those other people who stupidly believe that those guys actually communicated with God'.
|
08-09-2007, 12:20 PM | #24 |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 317
|
Come on. Statements like the one made by ksen about Johnny's lack of evidence are no different that others made by christians to non-believers. They act like they have some superior knowledge and pity the poor heathens that are not "saved". Maybe some people are not willing to base their lives on a violent book of fairy tales written thousands of years ago by a bunch of goat herders.
These statements are condescending and arrogant. They say things like "I used to have doubts and be confused like you, then I found jesus". If you want to accept evidence like Virgin Mary's face in a grilled cheese sandwich or some other nonsense, great. Don't act like nontheists are "confused" because they don't swallow such bunk. |
08-09-2007, 12:31 PM | #25 | |||
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 15,946
|
Quote:
I wasn't saying I had superior knowledge. I said the evidence I do have is sufficient for me. That's it. I have no idea what evidence Johnny has considered. But I do know from reading his threads that whatever evidence he has seen and considered has not been sufficient for him to accept that the God of the bible exists. That's not me being condescending to him. Quote:
I'm not sure why you are reacting the way you are to my posts. But whatever just know that I don't have the attitude you are describing. Quote:
And the only way I'd swallow that is after chewing it up and downing it with some milk. |
|||
08-09-2007, 12:32 PM | #26 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 15,946
|
I wasn't raised a christian. I was raised by parents ambivalent towards religion.
|
08-09-2007, 12:37 PM | #27 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 3,095
|
Quote:
Would you like to explain why you don't seem to see a difference between God telling us something and some guy writing in an ancient book that God told him to tell us something, and how that same view works on Islam, Mormonism, The Moonies, and the rest? |
|
08-09-2007, 12:43 PM | #28 |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 317
|
|
08-09-2007, 12:45 PM | #29 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 15,946
|
Quote:
All I can say right now is that I rely on the tradition I have been taught that the bible is God's communication to Mankind given through some other men. Was it divine dictation? I don't think so. Why do I accept my ancient guys and reject those from Islam, the Mormons, and the Moonies? I reject them because they depart from what's been written in the New Testament. |
||
08-09-2007, 12:45 PM | #30 |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 317
|
ksen- Out of curiosity, what evidence is sufficient for you?
EDIT- crossed posts |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|