|  | Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
|  02-03-2007, 01:13 PM | #1 | ||||
| Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Colorado 
					Posts: 8,674
				 |  The MJ argument that I am developing (apocalyptic devices) 
			
			I'm working on a follow-up to my prior JM article, and I'm addressing the writings of Paul and other non-Gospel writers and I'm basing a lot of stuff on the prior apocalyptic Jewish writings, such as The Book of Enoch and Apocalypse of Zephaniah, etc. What I'm going to be arguing is that all of writings of Paul, as well as the Apocalypse of John, and some of the other early epistles are using apocalyptic traditions in which visions are simply literary and theological devices, which none of these people ever experiences, but were simply ways of telling a story and lending weight to claims and claiming authority. I compare to other pre-Christian writings in which the exact same types of claims are made, but which scholars overwhelming dismiss as not talking about "real visions". I note that Paul was writings his letters during the height of the apocalyptic literary tradition and that his writings should be judged right along side the other writings of his time, place, and viewpoint. The Book of Enoch: Quote: 
 Quote: 
 Quote: 
 Quote: 
 Now, are there any particular problems with this argument? | ||||
|   | 
|  02-03-2007, 01:42 PM | #2 | 
| Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Kansas City, MO 
					Posts: 1,877
				 |   
			
			Interesting approach, and I don't think it's incompatible with Doherty's thesis, which you know I subscribe to.  A person can still believe he's received a "revelation," even if it wasn't as he describes in his writings, where he is using an existing literary form.  Makes sense.  Most scholars don't think Revelation is a real vision anyone had, but someone using the apocalyptic literary form as used in Daniel.
		 | 
|   | 
|  02-03-2007, 02:28 PM | #3 | |
| Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Colorado 
					Posts: 8,674
				 |   Quote: 
 | |
|   | 
|  02-03-2007, 02:40 PM | #4 | 
| Contributor Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: London UK 
					Posts: 16,024
				 |   
			
			Please check against James, varieties of religious experience, Persinger, Pagels and possibly Karen Armstrong's personal testimony. Don't forget sufism and the entire mystical tradition of all religions. | 
|   | 
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| 
 |