FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-16-2004, 09:55 PM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
Default

If Bart Ehrman's work Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew is a window we can peek through, we can see for example, that the Ebionite Christians, Marcion Christians, and Gnostic Christians fought The Christianity Battles .

Christianity never sprung from a HJ - the HJ wing is just the one that came on top. In fact, several times, like in Shepherd of Hermas, Didache, Epistle of Barnabas, 1 Clement, Even Tatian's Address to the Greeks, Odes of Solomon and Epistle to Diognetus, we see Christianity without a human founder. Others like the Epistle to Diognetus specifically state that there was no human founder/ messenger of God behind Christianity.

It is all so damn clear and it explains why Josephus says nothing about any temple incident, any Jesus of Nazareth, any eschatological prophet behind the so-called Galileans.
Ted Hoffman is offline  
Old 08-17-2004, 04:09 AM   #22
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

I have removed the discussion of the nature and definition of certain philosophical terms to ~E~, it is off topic.

Vorkosigan
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 08-17-2004, 07:31 AM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,443
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacob Aliet
Christianity never sprung from a HJ - the HJ wing is just the one that came on top. In fact, several times, like in Shepherd of Hermas, Didache, Epistle of Barnabas, 1 Clement, Even Tatian's Address to the Greeks, Odes of Solomon and Epistle to Diognetus, we see Christianity without a human founder. Others like the Epistle to Diognetus specifically state that there was no human founder/ messenger of God behind Christianity.
But the problem with this way of putting things is that even if we were to grant you your argument, it's still obviously true that Christianity had human founders. Indeed, probably some of these founders--or even one of them specifically--were more important than the others. The story may not exactly be what's in the gospels--and I'm even willing to concede that it could for all we know have been quite different--but that of course doesn't mean there wasn't a story. Anyway, it's off-topic.
the_cave is offline  
Old 08-17-2004, 08:03 AM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan
I have removed the discussion of the nature and definition of certain philosophical terms to ~E~, it is off topic.
There were two babies in that bathwater. Don't worry, I saved them.

The following is given under the heading ACCOUNT OF TATIAN'S CONVERSION:

"And, while I was giving my most earnest attention to the matter, I happened to meet with certain barbaric writings, too old to be compared with the opinions of the Greeks, and too divine to be compared with their errors; and I was led to put faith in these by the unpretending east of the language, the inartificial character of the writers, the foreknowledge displayed of future events, the excellent quality of the precepts, and the declaration of the government of the universe as centred in one Being. And, my soul being taught of God, I discern that the former class of writings lead to condemnation, but that these put an end to the slavery that is in the world, and rescue us from a multiplicity of rulers and ten thousand tyrants, while they give us, not indeed what we had not before received, but what we had received but were prevented by error from retaining."

First, what does "the unpretending east of the language" mean? Or is that a typo (ie east = ease)?

Second, am I interpreting this correctly to indicate Tatian accepted the beliefs he held at the time he wrote this address solely on the basis of reading Hebrew Scripture?
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 08-17-2004, 08:05 AM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13
First, what does "the unpretending east of the language" mean? Or is that a typo (ie east = ease)?

Second, am I interpreting this correctly to indicate Tatian accepted the beliefs he held at the time he wrote this address solely on the basis of reading Hebrew Scripture?
Jacob replied:

I think so. He read Hebrew scripture, Hebrew was barbaric compared to Greek (remember, he was educated and knew Greek) but he fell in love with the prophecy, the monotheism, kingship and divine quality of the Hebrew religion (proto-Christianity).

GDon Other Problems with Interpreting Archons as referring to Pilate:

1. Archons is plural, Pilate is singular.

2. Archons could not have been referring to the Jews either because the Jews were not leaders of the world but were under subjugation.

3. Paul could have known that not all the leaders of the world were responsible for Jesus' death therefore could not have blamed all of them.

4. Archons is not interchangeable with Pilate the way "US President" is interchangeable with "George W. Bush" therefore he could not have used archons to mean "Pilate".
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 03-04-2005, 04:37 AM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Kirby
Bernard Muller wrote a substantial rebuttal to Doherty's book and web site. I apologize to Bernard that I have not yet returned the favor by reviewing his web site. Muller's review is posted here:

http://www.didjesusexist.com/doherty-muller.html

Patrick Narkinsky (nope, he doesn't post here AFAIK) also volunteered to review the book. I think he's working on it, and I should probably e-mail him when my computer is working again.

I would be very happy if Gakusei Don wrote a review of Doherty's work to be published on my web site! Gakusei Don, please send an email to kirby@earthlink.net with your mailing address so that I can give you the book to review.

best,
Peter Kirby
*Yawn* What happened to GDon? I know Vinnie and Sumner found reasons to avoid writing a review...
Ted Hoffman is offline  
Old 03-04-2005, 01:39 PM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Hoffman
*Yawn* What happened to GDon? I know Vinnie and Sumner found reasons to avoid writing a review...
I emailed Peter about it, but my interest is more in the 2nd C CE apologists, whom I believe Doherty misrepresents shamelessly. (I have had an essay in the works about this for a while - one day I hope to complete it!)

I'm not confident that I have the knowledge to address Doherty's comments on Paul, which is probably more central to his ideas, so had to pass.
GakuseiDon is offline  
Old 03-04-2005, 02:52 PM   #28
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

Narkinsky? What happened to his?

Vorkosigan
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 03-05-2005, 01:33 AM   #29
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Narkinsky said he was halfway through writing a review. But I have emailed him four times in the last nine months without response.

best,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 03-05-2005, 06:48 AM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
Default

Thanks Peter. I guess all we have is Bernard Muller and Layman then.
Ted Hoffman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:36 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.