Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-24-2008, 12:11 PM | #111 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 525
|
Quote:
As long as I understand that there is a standard to living, and that we humans have an idea of what perfection is (in beauty, in morality, in reason and truth), it would be hard for me to lose faith. It seems to me more probable that the watered down version of perfection that we humans understand comes from a perfect being, rather than the chaos of nature around us. The opposite conclusion tends to reduce humanity to cogs in nature, truly unimportant in their existence. Because of the necessity of a low entropy first state of the universe and the subsequent increase of entropy, it seems likely that the universe was created by an all powerful being beyond entropy. Together these provide evidence, to me, of a perfect supreme being. I simply see the God of the Bible as a strong candidate for the position, because of his record for love and vengeance, his laws, forgiveness and grace. |
|
02-24-2008, 12:32 PM | #112 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
Quote:
Why do you think that atheist police officers are willing to risk their lives to try to save the lives of fundamentalist Christians? Since the Bible indicates that all non-Christian theists will go to hell, obviously, your arguments against atheism do not make any sense. |
|
02-25-2008, 08:27 AM | #113 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South America
Posts: 1,856
|
[QUOTE=ible;5172691]
Quote:
You asserted that a person that doesn't believe in God (and I'd bet you think a Christian God) doesn't have a good reason for doing good things, and that if one does not believe in God, it doesn't make a iota of difference to the person whether his actions are good or bad. My question was "if you lost your faith, would you stop classifying things as either good things or bad things, and do whatever pleases you? without thinking about consequences or feelings?" There might be people who lose their faith because not doing so would otherwise mean they can't keep engaging in certain kinds of behavior, who knows, but that definitely wasn't my case. My moral standards have not really changed at all as I moved from being a committed Christian to being more of an agnostic (at least for now), short of praying (which I loved to do) and talk theology/God with fellow Christians. |
|
02-25-2008, 05:49 PM | #114 | ||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 525
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The reason I'm telling you this is that I have a question: How do you know that your morality isn't just a vestige of what you first believed? For my friend, his picture of Christ would be unchanged if some of the elements (Christ's Godhood) were taken away, but the same cannot be said for the people who would begin their understanding of Christ with those elements removed. In a world where you did not start out as a fundamentalist Christian, would you have the emphasis of love and forgiveness that you do now? Quote:
|
||||||
02-25-2008, 06:41 PM | #115 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
Quote:
Quote:
Would you ask a liberal Christian "In a world where you did not start out as a liberal Christian, would you have the emphasis of love and forgiveness that you do now? Would any Christian who has lived during the past 2,000 years have been a more moral person if he had not become a Christian? Noted skeptic Bible scholar Dr. Robert Price once told me that in the first century, which was a time when most Christians endorsed slavery, some Sophists and Stoics opposed it. |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|