FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-16-2012, 06:45 AM   #41
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: middle east
Posts: 829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Weiss
Firstly, there is little to recommend the Bible as accurate history
Proof?
How much proof do you require? I can open any book of the bible and find mythical statements, sometimes multiple fantasies within the same verse.

History, unlike mythology, does not accord imaginary constructs a station on the stage with genuine, observable entities.

tanya is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 06:46 AM   #42
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Weiss View Post
That's why there are in excess of 30,000 Christian sects today.
That is like 30,000 dogs fighting over a bone and the spectator runs away with it.
Chili is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 06:50 AM   #43
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tanya View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Weiss
Firstly, there is little to recommend the Bible as accurate history
Proof?
How much proof do you require? I can open any book of the bible and find mythical statements, sometimes multiple fantasies within the same verse.
Why talk about it? Do it.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 06:52 AM   #44
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 6,010
Default religious disdain?

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve_bnk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
Based on that PBS TV show, the category for the Bible (or would it be just the Synoptic gospels in this case) should be "history". History always has its dark corners and debatable points, but no one involved just dismisses it as fiction or myths from centuries past. But no one here has suggested "history". Oh, that's because this is FRDB.
I do not get your point.

The OT is the surviving sum of an ethnic culture. The OT from a hman perspective is a study in religion, psychology, and human civilization.

Jewish history is no more a dark corner than Egyptian, Incan, or Persian history.

It is irrational to cloud the study of the Abrahamic tradition with a religious disdain.
It is one thing to study the folkways and mores of ethnic or religious groupings or tribes and yet a very different matter to establish the truth of these traditions. In most cases these stories cannot be and never will be verified as they are lost in the clouds of time. People may cling to these ethnic identifiers for security purposes, but that does not make them true.
Steve Weiss is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 06:56 AM   #45
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 6,010
Default proof of claims

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by tanya View Post
How much proof do you require? I can open any book of the bible and find mythical statements, sometimes multiple fantasies within the same verse.
Why talk about it? Do it.
The proof of a truth claim falls 100% on the person who asserts the truth. Without necessary and sufficient noncontradictory evidence, the truth claims falls away as if it were never asserted. There is no necessity to disprove any truth claim or to rebut a fallacious claim. A case not made is void and should be ignored.
Steve Weiss is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 06:57 AM   #46
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tanya View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Weiss
Firstly, there is little to recommend the Bible as accurate history
Proof?
How much proof do you require? I can open any book of the bible and find mythical statements, sometimes multiple fantasies within the same verse.

History, unlike mythology, does not accord imaginary constructs a station on the stage with genuine, observable entities.

It speaks to all ages, whether coming, going, singing, dancing even if spoken without emphasis, as we listen with our ears and hear with our mind (and don't forget to rattle the silver plate to freely give that we might receive as golden).
Chili is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 06:59 AM   #47
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Weiss View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by tanya View Post
How much proof do you require? I can open any book of the bible and find mythical statements, sometimes multiple fantasies within the same verse.
Why talk about it? Do it.
The proof of a truth claim falls 100% on the person who asserts
Very good!

'there is little to recommend the Bible as accurate history'

So prove it.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 07:06 AM   #48
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 6,010
Default myth as history

Quote:
Originally Posted by tanya View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce
Proof?
How much proof do you require? I can open any book of the bible and find mythical statements, sometimes multiple fantasies within the same verse.

History, unlike mythology, does not accord imaginary constructs a station on the stage with genuine, observable entities.

Were the Hebrews slaves unto Pharaoh before the Exodus? There is no record of such anywhere outside the OT, and the OT is not self-verifying, and neither is any other book. Did Samson kill 1000 Phillistines with the jawbone of an ass? No. That is not possible, and so are most of the fantastic stories of the Bible. There was no David and Goliath event, no plagues, no splitting of the Jordan River and the Red Sea, and no 24 hour pause in the rotation of the earth on its axis. This is all fiction made to puff up the importance of a small, nomadic tribe. That people still give such stories credence is shocking.
Steve Weiss is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 07:12 AM   #49
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 6,010
Default you still don't get it

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Weiss View Post

The proof of a truth claim falls 100% on the person who asserts
Very good!

'there is little to recommend the Bible as accurate history'

So prove it.
The supporters of Abrahamic religion assert that the Bible is an accurate account of real events. That is an assertion that requires proof. Lacking proof that is both necessary and sufficient as well as noncontradictory, the claim fails. All that observes have to do is evaluate the claim and pass judgement as to whether truth standards have been achieved. When these standards have not been met the claim is dismissed as being empty.
Steve Weiss is offline  
Old 02-16-2012, 07:56 AM   #50
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Weiss View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Weiss View Post

The proof of a truth claim falls 100% on the person who asserts
Very good!

'there is little to recommend the Bible as accurate history'

So prove it.
The supporters of Abrahamic religion assert that the Bible is an accurate account of real events.
Not in this thread.

The OP gives the opinion that the Bible is fiction. There has yet to be read, after many posts, any evidence that any of it is fiction, except that which is not intended to be understood as fact.

Is this thread serious, or frivolous?
sotto voce is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:43 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.