FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Science & Skepticism > Evolution/Creation
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-26-2005, 09:39 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: God is a Mind Loop
Posts: 1,344
Default

I suspect you're right - it is not a the greatest drawing. People should look at the OP for examples of different, photographed, whale pectoral fin bones.
Hopeful Monsters is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 10:13 AM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: God is a Mind Loop
Posts: 1,344
Cool Watch a 5 minute movie about whale evolution

...in RealPlayer

...in QuickTime Player

With thanks to PBS: Whale Evolution by PBS

___________________________________



And here is Transitional Forms of Whales/Whale Evolution ― note important point about ear bones.

:
Hopeful Monsters is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 11:00 AM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2,127
Default

Reminds me of a disagreement I had with an ID supporter on another forum. He was saying that the Whales could never have evolved from animals with hands because he couldn't see how you could have a forelimb that was halfway between a grasping hand and a flipper - it would be useless for either function (in his view).

kind of sums up the stupidity of ID really
Monad is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 11:16 AM   #24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sweden (via Canada)
Posts: 715
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Monad:
...he couldn't see how you could have a forelimb that was halfway between a grasping hand and a flipper - it would be useless for either function (in his view)
I guess this guy has never been swimming before.
Martin B is offline  
Old 02-27-2005, 08:52 AM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nic Tamzek
Random question: does the ulna (I think that's the ulna) in the bat arm do anything? It looks reduced and doesn't extend all the way to the wrist.
From Mammalogy, 3rd edition, T.A. Vaughan:

Quote:
The distal part of the ulna is reduced in bats, and the proximal section usually forms an important part of the articular surface of the elbow joint.
The text also mentions the reduced fibula but doesn't elaborate on its function.
Blinn is offline  
Old 02-27-2005, 11:28 AM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orion Arm of the Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 3,092
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EscapeVelocity
Whale evolution―

Mesonychid origins of whales was disproven for fossil finds several years ago. They used to be a favorite of fossil people.
Valentine Pontifex is offline  
Old 02-27-2005, 11:38 AM   #27
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 582
Default

Quote:
Escapevelocity, in that picture above, with the 4 different forelimbs, it looks like the whale one has an excessive number of phalanges. Is that right, or is it 'artistic license' and not really a good illustration?

Cheers,
Lane
It's probably accurate. Hyperphalangy is quite common in marine tetrapod flippers (e.g. whales, plesiosaurs, ichthyosaurs), whereas hyperdactyly is much rarer - restricted to ichthyosaurs as far as I recall.

Cheers, Per
Per Ahlberg is offline  
Old 02-27-2005, 11:09 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 926
Default

Originally Posted by Nic Tamzek
Random question: does the ulna (I think that's the ulna) in the bat arm do anything? It looks reduced and doesn't extend all the way to the wrist.

Varecia: From the photo, it looks like it's also fused to the radius (at least the right side looks fused; the left looks like it's broken). While I've not studied bats, it does remind me of the fusion of lower leg bones in tarsiers, who are great leapers. Similarly, I'm guessing that it is an adaptation to the biomechanical stresses of the bat wing.
Varecia is offline  
Old 02-27-2005, 11:45 PM   #29
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
Default mesonychid

Quote:
Originally Posted by Valentine Pontifex
Mesonychid origins of whales was disproven for fossil finds several years ago. They used to be a favorite of fossil people.
don't they assume whales are cousins of hippos nowadays?
premjan is offline  
Old 02-28-2005, 02:59 AM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: God is a Mind Loop
Posts: 1,344
Default

Valentine Pontifex - I too saw something on this (Mesonychids no longer considered a very early ancestor) but have not had time to research it.

premjan - one recent piece of evidence I read yesterday suggests that DNA analysis of living mammals show the hippopotamus to be the closest living relative of whales.
Hopeful Monsters is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:29 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.