FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-16-2008, 11:37 AM   #11
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central Europe
Posts: 118
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle View Post
When do you get elsewhere people telling you what it says and having huge institutions telling you what the party line is?
Exactly, just this gives validity to go negative on the probability...you just have to make parallels and go outside the fallacious religious symbolic field of inherent legitimacy.
AtheistVirus is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 01:11 PM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
Roman execution records
Sorry?

Further details please!
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 01:27 PM   #13
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 14,915
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle View Post
Quote:
Roman execution records
Sorry?

Further details please!
I think those were shredded with the Enron docs.
Vampyroteuthis is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 02:19 PM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AtheistVirus View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
For most purposes, the human Jesus theory is enough to defeat the idea that Jesus was the fleshy part of the trinity who got himself born of a virgin and crucified under Pilate, then rose from the dead and sits at the right hand of God.
I'm not interested in biases and pandering, if there is already enough direct and circumstantial evidence of Jesus's nonexistence why not say "probably didn't exist" instead of "probably did exist", negative probability is more solid than positive, isn't it?
I guess it just comes down to the cultural fact that if you say Jesus never existed, the person you are talking to may take it as a DIRECT personal attack on the very basis of their being - much more so than saying that God doesn't exist. Then their brain will go into defensive overdrive mode and whatever hope you had of communicating will be gone.

That's just my experience.
Toto is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 02:30 PM   #15
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Children manage to survive learning Santa doesn't exist, so why the adult temper tantrum about this?
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 02:35 PM   #16
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 14,915
Default

Toto, I agree.
Vampyroteuthis is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 04:46 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NAS Atlanta
Posts: 2,104
Default

I thought that Jesus was such a popular name at that time that there were hundreds of Jesus'. Just pick one who happened to be a carpenter.
Gamer4Fire is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 07:19 PM   #18
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Longueuil, Canada
Posts: 13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AtheistVirus View Post
Why does Dawkins always say that Jesus probably existed, he always uses that wording instead simply saying, "let's pretend he existed, than..." or "Jesus probably didn't exist"

Has he read this-
http://www.rationalrevolution.net/ar...th_history.htm
It's a good case but it's not the consensus as of yet.

Since this isn't even his field, why should he even bother with it until there is a consensus amongst scholars who actually study this issue?


I got to say, I'm fairly sympathetic to the mythical Jesus idea, but you just sound like a sport fan shouting : ''How can you doubt the Sox will win the world series!'' Hey, they have a good team but I'm not betting the farm until the other teams ave been eliminated.
Mal Malenkirk is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 08:47 PM   #19
DBT
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: ɹǝpunuʍop puɐן ǝɥʇ
Posts: 17,906
Default

I think there's a reasonable possibility that the Jesus myth was based on a charismatic preacher going by the name of Yeshua Ben Yoseph. There is not much to go on but considering Paul/Saul was a near contemporary and Christianity was already getting established by word of mouth, it seems unlikely that there ws no basis whatsoever for the movement.
DBT is offline  
Old 05-17-2008, 02:16 AM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 3,382
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J.F. Gaul View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vampyroteuthis
I think I missed the announcement proclaiming jebus was a real person. Can you send me a pic or something?


It's Jesus. Yay!
I am most impressed by his perfect, bright white teeth.
purple_kathryn is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:55 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.