Drew J

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/m...eaththreats.htm
RELATED:
NY Police Report Bomb To Frame Activist As Terrorist
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...reportbomb.htm

Sultanist

So...

1. The Illuminati called Larry Silverstein on the morning of 9-11 to warn him not to come to work.

and

2. Larry Silverstein was at the scene so he could order the controlled demolition of 7 WTC.

Hmmm. If Larry was there so he could give the order to "pull it", then why would they not have wanted him to be there?
Now that there just don't make a whole lotta sense do it.
I wonder, Drew, did anyone bother to ask Mr. Jones that?

Drew J

Apparently you don't realize that he can be in New York city to help decide to pull it and also not be in the buildling. I mean why would you be in a building you plan to pull? Pretty hard to cash in on your insurance claim if you stayed in a building you wanted pulled wouldn't you say?

Sultanist

I gotta admit, you and Alex just got too many of the bases covered for an old hick like me to get the best of ya'll, Drew.

EssEff

I wonder if the phone calls came through his phone line or through the implants in his brain.

Sultanist

But hold the phone just a minute now. Here's the quote...

"WTC leaseholder Larry Silverstein got a warning on the morning of 9/11 not to come to work."

Now "don't come to work" to me usually means to stay home. It doesn't mean
"don't go inside the building" does it, Drew?
So again, if you needed Larry there to give the command to drop 7 WTC, why would you call him and tell him to stay home?

Sultanist

Whoa wait just a dadgum minute here.
Okay, so they called Larry and when they said "don't come to work", they meant "don't go inside the building". Let's say I buy that just for argument's sake.

So now we have a scenario where Larry apparently didn't know nothing about this plot until after it had happened.
Because, let's face it, if he had known beforehand that it was gonna go down, then they sure would not have needed to call him and tell him to stay out of a building that was gonna be attacked now would they.

So that means that it was on the day of 9-11 that it first occurred to him to "pull it".
But see that flies squarely in the face of everything else claimed in this "theory". That Larry had deliberately planned all this because he was losing his ass on this piece of property and he planned it all in advance to defraud the insurance company.
It seems that Alex has now very conveniently just forgotten all that part of the "plot".
Do you think Alex could have somehow come down with a case of amnesia, Drew?

NZSkep

QFT. just about to post almost the exact same thing.

If Silverstein was in on the whole thing and knew there was going to be an 'attack' do you think he would leave it up to one of his minions to warn him of the morning. If he was in on it, he would have known the date ages before and the warning on that morning would have been pointless.

Idolator

It's just another example of 9/11 truthers trying to have it both ways. Like how they claim WTC 1 & 2 must have been controlled demolitions because they collapsed onto their own footprints without damaging nearby structures, and then they say WTC 7 also must have been a controlled demolition because it collapsed even though nothing damaged it. Or how they can't decide if the Pentagon was hit by a car bomb, an anti-tank missile from a helicopter, or a cruise missile, so they claim all three - at the same time.

(Loose Change makes all these claims, I think.)

Getting back to the OP, is there any independent evidence about this guy getting threats?

Drew J

Who said this? I never said he had to be in the building or even at the building. His words were simply, "I got a call from the fire department commander telling me they didn't think they were going to be able to contain the fire. So I said, 'we've had such a terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."
Notice he says he got a call. In other words a phone call. You trying to tell me that phone calls that day couldn't reach as far as they normally were designed to reach? You're telling me Larry couldn't have actually been farther away when he got this call DUE TO THIS WARNING? You're implying there is a logical contradiction in ideas when there is none.

Speaking of people who talk about 9-11 wanting things both ways.

The Coincidence Theorists Guide to 9-11.
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/coinc...e15aug04.shtml

9-11 Fruit Loops.
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/...DCTPFA911.html