Freethought & Rationalism Archive

ApostateAbe · 10-29-2011, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toto

Quote:

Originally Posted by ApostateAbe

...
I don't know why you left that part out of the OP.

Copyright limits the amount you can quote.

OK, cool.

aa5874 · 10-29-2011, 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ApostateAbe

Do you happen to know the complete quote of Martin? I don't think it is useful to trust the paraphrase of the The Daily Times in this case....

What a joke.

You BELIEVE stories about a Child of a Ghost that was the Creator of heaven and earth do CONTAIN some history but have problem with a paraphrase in the Daily Times.

You seem to TRUST your imagination.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ApostateAbe

... All historical Jesuses are constructs, and of course ideally they would be designed to emulate the real person, but not many actually do a good job. The modern Jesus popularly believed, the family-friendly historical Jesus, is only a modern construct....

ALL CONSTRUCTS of HJ are of the BUILDERS themselves and that is PRECISELY the reason for the ABANDONMENT of the HJ argument.

As is EVIDENT you IMAGINE that your Jesus is the TRUE.

That sounds familiar to me.

Believers FIGHT over their IMAGINATION of Jesus when authors WROTE that Jesus was a Child of a Ghost.

There is NO room for imagination,.

It is a big Joke.

Don't you get it??

Authors claimed Jesus was a Child of a Ghost.:constern01::constern01::constern01:

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.