FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-21-2011, 08:29 PM   #211
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
...Do you think I am mistaken as identifying these 17 extracts as "satire" and/or "parody"?
Yes, in general.

And Emperor Julian did not employ satire in his "The Caesars"?


Quote:
If there is any satire, it is from the point of view of a heretical Christian, not from the point of view of an unreconstructed pagan.
The object of the satire, the satirized, was the "orthodox canonical christian story". The author(s) of the satires, the satirists, oppose the "orthodox canonical christian story". Who were they ?

The generation of Alexandrians that witnessed Constantine's military supremacy in the Eastern empire, that witnessed the destruction and prohibition of other PanHellenic regions and temples, and that witnessed the Council of Nicaea, which raised Jesus and the Apostles to divinity, and burnt the literature of the Neoplatonic lineage in the academic and Euclid-preserving Porphyry, IMO are the prime suspects for immediate anti-orthodox-canonical-christian Greek academic and clever literary satire at the grass roots level. People like the non-christian "Arian philosophers" who were well represented at the Council of Nicaea, according to Philip of Side.
mountainman is offline  
Old 04-02-2011, 07:20 AM   #212
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default analysis of over 100 NT apocyrphal texts by "Attesting Witness Category"

Summary of the Gnostic Gospels and Acts by Witness Categories that have been defined as follows:


[T2]{r:bg=lightgray}{c:bg=slategray;ah=center;b-b=2,solid,black}Cat#
|
{c:ah=center;b-b=2,solid,black}Witness Category Description
|
{c:ah=center;b-b=2,solid,black}# Texts
|
{c:ah=center;b-b=2,solid,black}% Texts
|
{c:w=45;ah=center;b-b=2,solid,black}Comments & Notes
||
{c:bg=#F00000;av=top}1
|
{c:bg=#F00000;av=top}Eusebius et al present "early witnesses"
|
{c:av=top}12
|
{c:av=top}11 %
|
{c:av=top}Critical: citations examined
||
{c:bg=Orange;av=top}2
|
{c:bg=Orange;av=top}Eusebius himself is earliest "witness"
|
{c:av=top}5
|
{c:av=top}5 %
|
{c:av=top}Eusebius to be examined
||
{c:bg=#A0FFA0;av=top}3
|
{c:bg=#A0FFA0;av=top}No textual witness
|
{c:av=top}9
|
{c:av=top}8 %
|
{c:av=top}There is no text to be examined
||
{c:bg=#A0FFA0;av=top}4
|
{c:bg=#A0FFA0;av=top}No "early witnesses"
|
{c:av=top}27
|
{c:av=top}25 %
|
{c:av=top}We have no early evidence
||
{c:bg=#A0FFA0;av=top}5
|
{c:bg=#A0FFA0;av=top}Late witnesses
|
{c:av=top}55
|
{c:av=top}51 %
|
{c:av=top}Fourth Century or later evidence
||
[/T2]



mountainman is offline  
Old 04-06-2011, 11:39 PM   #213
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default Was the snake's name "Monty"? .. Monty Pythonish satire in the Gnostic Gospels, Acts

Most recent article .... in summary of all foregoing discussions

An alternative chronology for the lost authorship of the Gnostic Gospels
A critical examination and analysis of the manuscript evidence debunking the idea of "early Christian" authorship.


Quote:
Originally Posted by EXTRACT

An alternative theory

Introduction


An alternative theory for the chronology of Greek authorship the Gnostic Gospels is explored that commences c.324/325 CE and as a direct reaction against the sudden appearance of the new testament canonical books in the Eastern Roman empire, particularly Alexandria, in the form of the Constantine's Bible. To do justice the account, a complete outline of Constantine's actions and measures prior to his supremacy is not necessary, and neither is the question of the authenticity of the canonical books of the new testament published by Constantine, and largely preserved to this day.

The New Testament is immediately ridiculed by the Alexandrian Greeks
It is sufficient to understand that the books of the Constantine bible were either totally unknown or little known, and that the Alexandrian Greeks soundly satired them from one street corner theatre to another. Eusebius confirms this fact when he writes:
"the sacred matters of inspired teaching
were exposed to the most shameful ridicule
in the very theaters of the unbelievers.


How Controversies originated at Alexandria
through Matters relating to Arius


Eusebius, "Life of Constantine", Ch. LXI

Recalling April Deconick's assessment that "Gnostic texts use parody and satire quite frequently ... making fun of traditional biblical beliefs", the following selection of citations taken from the Gnostic Gospels and Acts will come as no surprise to those who are familiar with Monty Python's "Life of Brian". Have we been digging up the heretical jesus jokes of the gnostics?



The Satire against the Jesus of the Canonical books was the Heresy of the Gnostic authors

As the self-appointed delegate of Jesus, and the one pushing the canonisation of the books of the Constantine Bible, Constantine took offence at the underground non canonical books appearing, because the stories made fun of what he perceived to be grave church business.

If it can be established that the signature of antichristian satire exists in the Gnostic Gospels etc, then it is quite obvious from all the above, such texts would attract the wrath of the orthodox, in proportion to their popularity with the populace. And by all reports, the Gnostic Gospels and Acts were very popular in their day. Consequently, if the following analysis has sufficient integrity, these books became heretical because they treated lightly a subject that was close to Constantine's heart. That was of course, Constantine's own popularity. People were laughing at these other stories. Why were they laughing? What was wrong with the stories in his set of books?



In the Gnostic Gospels .....
"To you I'm an atheist; to God, I'm the Loyal Opposition"

(Woody Allen)
.
In the Gospel of Peter, Jesus is lead from the tomb by two giant figures whose heads reach to the sky. Jesus's head is described as being higher than the sky; while the cross , not content with immobility and silence, follows along behind Jesus at a walk, and speaks its own talk. It says "Yeah !"

In the Gospel of Philip, "Jesus came to crucify the world", but exactly where did Jesus often kiss Mary? On her forehead? on her cheek? on her lips? The manuscript has been damaged at that precise spot. Jesus could have often kissed Mary anywhere.

In the Gospel of Judas, Judas is presented as one of twelve "daimons". None of the twelve "daimons" can look at Jesus in the eyes. Jesus is presented as a "Head Daimion" or sorceror.

In The Gospel of Mary , Mary is presented in having exclusive knowledge not given to Peter. As a result, Peter is peeved. "Did He really speak privately with a woman and not openly to us? Are we to turn about and all listen to her? Did He prefer her to us?"

In the Infancy Gospel of Thomas, the Child Jesus as a malevolent trickster wizard. Death and destruction follow the child jesus. A child disperses water that Jesus has collected, Jesus then curses him, which causes the child's body to wither into a corpse, found in the Greek text A, and Latin versions. The Greek text B doesn't mention Jesus cursing the boy, and simply says that the child "went on, and after a little he fell and gave up the ghost," Another child dies when Jesus curses him when he apparently accidentally bumps into him When Joseph and Mary's neighbors complain, they are miraculously struck blind by Jesus. Jesus then starts receiving lessons, but arrogantly tries to teach the teacher instead.

In the Infancy Gospel of James, the Child Jesus is born in a cave with its Mithraic overtones.

In The Gospel of Nicodemus, the story is presented as being authored by two zombies who, while wandering around Jerusalem after the mass resurrection following Jesus's resurrection, are apprehended by the authorities, and are given pens and paper. The two resurrected scribes, known as Leucius & Karinus, independently record the Descent and Ascension, Jesus meets Adam. At the end, after finding that the accounts were word for word identical they provide a copy for Pilate, and a copy for the Jews, the two scribes disappear with a flash of light.

In the Gospel of Gamaliel Pilate weeps over the shroud.

The Gospel of Bartholomew "deliberately imitates the Lucan Acts"

.


In the Gnostic Acts of the Apostles .....
"Rhetoric does not get you anywhere,
because Hitler and Mussolini [ed. and Constantine]
are just as good at rhetoric.
but if you can bring these people down with comedy,
they stand no chance."


(Mel Brooks)
.

In the Acts of Andrew, Andrew prays and there is an earthquake. Andrew mentions banishing the demons from Nicaea. "At the gate of Nicomedia he met a dead man borne on a bier, and his old father supported by slaves, hardly able to walk, and his old mother with hair torn, bewailing. 'How has it happened ?' he asked. 'He was alone in his chamber and seven dogs rushed on him and killed him.' Andrew sighed and said: 'This is an ambush of the demons I banished from Nicaea.'" Who was banished from Nicaea?

In the Acts of Andrew and Matthew, the apostles Cast lots for world dominion (just like the Roman soldiers in the story of the crucifixion). Jesus is the captain of a water taxi to the "Land of the Cannibals" in order to rescue the apostle Matthew. Welcome aboard! Meanwhile, trapped in the "Land of the Cannibals" after drinking certain substances, Matthew, despite the fact that many are being eaten daily, closes his eyes to everything going on around him. Help was on the way.

The Acts of John is seen as docetic. Jesus does not leave footprints in the sand. John cannot seem to touch Jesus' physical body. John commands a legion of bed bugs. Jesus was constantly changing shape, appearing sometimes as a small boy, sometimes as a beautiful man; sometimes bald-headed with a long beard, sometimes as a youth with a pubescent beard. .... Sometimes when I meant to touch him [Jesus], I met with a material and solid body; but at other times when I felt him, his substance was immaterial and incorporeal, as if it did not exist at all ... And I often wished, as I walked with him, to see his footprint, whether it appeared on the ground (for I saw him as it were raised up from the earth), and I never saw it.

In the Acts of John the Theologian, the Jews write a book to the Emperor Domitian, comlaining about a "new and strange nation". As a result, Domitian flies into a rage an persecutes the "New and Strange Nation of Christians. This term "new and strange nation" is a recognised Eusebian trope. The author of this text thus wrote after Eusebius had coined the phrase.

In The Acts of Paul, the author uses Aesops Fables in the Baptised Lion Affair. Paul baptises a talking lion in the wilderness. When thrown to the lions at the conclusion Paul is saved from certain death by the christian lion in the arena. (One good turn deserves another!)

In the Acts of Peter, Peter resurrects smoked fish, makes dogs talk, and wins a very exiting miracle contest with Simon Magus.

In the (Syriac) Act of Peter, Peter heals the multitudes on his front porch, but forgets to heal his own daughter (because it is expedient not to heal her).

In the Acts of Peter and Andrew, the apostles travel hither and tither by means of a "bright cloud". (Beam me up Scotty!) The apostles call on a powerful Christian Arch-Angel to suspend a woman by her hair at the city gates while they pass unmolested out of town. Peter successfully passes a camel through the eye of a needle, twice.

In the Acts of Peter and Paul, the Jews hear that Paul plans to come to Rome and petition Nero to prevent this. Another version of Peter vs Simon Magus miracle contest is recounted, this time with Paul present, and enacted in front of the Roman Emperor Nero. Paul is presented as "bald", and attracts his bald shipmaster, Dioscorus, as a follower after delivering his son from death. Nero kills the bald Dioscorus instead of Paul. The Jews rejoice.

In the (Syriac) Acts of Philip, is Philip literate, not knowing either Greek or Aramaic? Philip commands a Christian angel to bind the Jew Ananias to the top of the mast by his big toes in a raging storm on account of his blaspheming in a sotto voice. "And the 495 men on the ship feared". Philip is a man of power and action, who battles armies with the cross: "When Philip crossed himself the ruler fell backward and all his troops." Ananias sets out presumeably to convert the Jews, as coerced by Philip. Impatient at his angelic qualities, the Jews kick Ananias to death and bury him in their synogogue. Philip resurrects Ananias, and commandeers a sick ox to assist retrieving the dead Jew from the synogogue. The commandeered sick ox runs on his mission, dragging his owner through the streets of Carthage. The ox and Ananias prostrate themselves before Philip. The city worshipped Philip. "Three thousand Gentiles and fifteen hundred Jews believed; the unbelievers left the city, and before sunset an angel slew forty of the Jewish priests for shedding innocent blood: and all who saw it confessed and worshipped. " People were impressed with the aggressive Christian angel slaying of forty priests. On the basis of this aggressive blood-thirsty revenge killings by the christian angel, people were converted to christianity.

In Acts of Pilate, when the Jews complain that Jesus healed people on Sunday, Pilate informs the Jews that Jesus "healed the lame and the bent, the withered and the blind and the paralytic, the dumb and them that were possessed, by the power of Asclepius", the 4th century Graeco-Roman healing god, whose most ancient and highly revered temples (and libraries) Constantine had just destroyed.

In the Acts of Thomas, the apostles are again "casting lots for the clothes of the nations", but Thomas refuses to abide by the lot he drew.for the journey to Indian. He does not want to go to India. He says: "'I am an Hebrew man; how can I go amongst the Indians and preach the truth?'" Jesus appears and directly commands Thomas to go to India, but Thomas directly refuses to obey. The next day, at the local markets, Jesus sells Thomas as a slave to an Indian merchant. The price for Thomas paid to Jesus was three litrae of silver unstamped. Jesus actually writes a deed of sale, saying: "I, Jesus, the son of Joseph the carpenter, acknowledge that I have sold my slave, Judas by name, unto thee Abbanes, a merchant of Gundaphorus, king of the Indians." Once in India, Thomas mispresents himself to the Indian King as a master builder. The Indian king gives Thomas a great deal of money to build a new palace. Thomas gives the money to the poor. Eventually, when the Indian King realises that Thomas is not a master builder and has lost all his money, "he rubbed his face with his hands, and shook his head for a long space. "

In the Acts of Titus, Paul fasts for seven days and causes the Temple of Apollo to be destroyed. (This matter of temple destruction by the Christians becomes a political reality immediately Constantine became supreme c.324 CE)

In the NHC 6.1 Acts of Peter and the Twelve Apostles, are there 11, 12 or 13 apostles? The text discloses that eleven apostles prostrated themselves (twice) on the ground in front of Lithargoel, in the oriental fashion of worship, made popular in Constantine's era. If Lithargoel is taken to be Jesus, an indentification made by every single academic commentator to date (alternatively, Lithargoel may be identified as a physician/priest of Asclepius) then Jesus cites the Bagavad Gita, in making reference to the "City of Nine Gates". Also if Jesus carries a codex in his left hand, that is similar to (not the same) as the codex carried by Peter, what is the codex that Jesus carried, and did the Christians instruct Martial on codex technology?



In other Gnostic Treatises and at Nag Hammadi .....
"Our generation is fleeing since it does not yet even believe that the Christ is alive"

(NHC 11.1)
.
In the History of John the author names himself "Eusebius of Cæsarea" - "This history was composed by Eusebius of Cæsarea concerning S. John, who found it in a Greek book, and it was translated into Syriac, when he had learned concerning his way of life and his birth and his dwelling in the city of Ephesus, after the ascension of our Lord to Heaven".

In the Revelation of the Magi, The Magi, originally Sethians, get converted to Christianity - An entertaining story of the Magi, their history, their role in attending the birth of the Jesus Star, and their ultimate conversion to Christianity in a far-off land by Thomas Judas (of great fame in his "Acts of Thomas" where he converts the Indians from Hinduism and Buddhism). Why the Magi were required to be converted from their tradition to Christianity is rhetorical.

In The Apocalypse of Paul, some Gnostic wanted equal rights. Either Paul or Mary (depending on the versions) persuades God to give everyone in Hell a day off every Sunday. In the later 4th century Epiphanius refers to this as "a forged book full of unspeakable matter in the name of Paul".. Obviously Epiphanius couldn't see the joke.

In the NHC 5.3 First Apocalypse of James, Jesus dispenses Gnostic Passwords to James on how to ascend to the seventy-second heaven - a late instruction course on the appropriate passwords for the maximum ascension after crucifixion.

In the NHC 5.4 Second Apocalypse of James, Jesus dispenses a kiss to James - disclaimers are provided, but James dies a gruesome death.

In the NHC 7.3 Apocalypse of Peter, the author writes: "The Bishops are dry canals". Jesus is presented as laughing about the whole situation ... "He whom you saw on the tree, glad and laughing, this is the living Jesus."

In the NHC 7.2 Second Treatise of the Great Seth, deemed docetic, Jesus does not die on the cross, but laughs. (Jesus as purported narrator). "we were hated and persecuted, not only by those who are ignorant, but also by those who think that they are advancing the name of Christ, since they were unknowingly empty, not knowing who they are, like dumb animals. They persecuted those who have been liberated by me, since they hate them..."

In the NHC 1.2 Apocryphon of James , Peter and James miss their chance to go to heaven. More questions from the apostles are answered by the resurrected Jesus. Jesus invites Peter and James into the Kingdom of Heaven with him, but they are distracted by the other apostles' questions and miss their chance.

In the Letter of Peter to Philip (NHC 8.2), a Gnostic Sermon on the Mount of Olives is presented with a certain amount of melodrama. The apostles gather together, and treck to the summit of the Mount of Olives, where they persistently petition for the appearance of Jesus. "Then a great light appeared so that the mountains shone from the sight of him who had appeared. And a voice called out to them saying, "Listen to my words that I may speak to you. "Why are you asking me?"

In the NHC 1.1 Prayer of the Apostle Paul, the prayer consists of eleven sentences containing nineteen abrupt demands to a "psychic God" ("O Lord wont you buy me a mercedes benz?")

In the NHC 9.3 Testimony of Truth, John turns back the River Jordon! It also presents the story of the Garden of Eden from viewpoint of the serpent: It appears that the snake's advice was for garden variety of people who may have been contemplating a conversion to the "Christian principalities and authorities".of that generation's epoch. The snake may well be related to Panhellenic Asclepius, over whom the 4th century Christian revolution had been particularly unkind..... "The foolish, thinking in their heart that if they confess "We are Christians," in word only but not with power, while giving themselves over to a human death, not knowing where they are going or who Christ is, thinking that they will live while they are really in error, hasten toward the principalities and the authorities.".

In the Hypostasis of the Archons (also known as "The Reality of the Rulers"), the Apostle Paul is presented as declaring that the chief ruler is blind on account of his power and arrogance, and because the chief ruler, with his power, thinks that he is God. This description of the blind chief may be directed at Constantine. "I [Paul] have sent this (to you) because you inquire about the reality of the authorities. Their chief is blind; because of his power and his ignorance and his arrogance he said, with his power, "It is I who am God; there is none apart from me."

The Sophia of Jesus Christ represents evidence of fabrication. Robin Lane-Fox summarises this as: "A pagan letter of "Eugnostos the Blessed" (NHC 3.3) was then given a christian preface and a conclusion (NHC 5.1) and represented in another copy (NHC 3.4) as the "wisdom" which Jesus revealed to his Apostles after his death.. See also the comments of Arnaldo Momigliano on the "Christianization of literature". The process of the construction of the Christian Sophia of Jesus Christ from the pagan letter of "Eugnostos the Blessed" has been purposefully documented - blueprinted - by the editor of the Nag Hammadi Codices.

In the NHC 11.1 "Interpretation of Knowledge" the Gnostics flee before the onrush of the Christian message, which was associated with reproaches and humiliations, and never got to hear the end bit of the story, that Jesus had been crucified. "they came to believe by means of signs and wonders and fabrications. The likeness that came to be through them followed him, but through reproaches and humiliations before they received the apprehension of a vision they fled without having heard that the Christ had been crucified." The text continues .... "But our generation is fleeing since it does not yet even believe that the Christ is alive" Here it would appear that some doubted whether the Christ ever lived at all in an historical sense. With extreme docetism, the text continues .... "And he was crucified and he died - not his own death, for he did not at all deserve to die because of the church of mortals. And he was nailed so that they might keep him in the Church."

In NHC 6.8 Asclepius 21-29 we find a pleasant discussion between Hermes and Asclepius. Asclepius might have been asking why, after Constantine utterly destroyed his highly revered and ancient temples, he ordered for the public execution of the head priests. Hermes to Asclepius "Trismegistus, who are these (daimons)?" "Asclepius, they are the ones who are called 'stranglers', and those who roll souls down on the dirt, and those who scourge them, and those who cast into the water, and those who cast into the fire, and those who bring about the pains and calamities of men."

In the NHC 6.5 fragment of Plato, Republic 588A-589B lies a cyptic Gnostic political message about the end of the Panhellenic Repubic. It is not a just a "poor Coptic translation of the Greek". The Coptic purposefully deviates from the original, and it is in the difference between the two versions, that a consistent message is delivered. See the analysis results of Comparing Plato' Republic in the Nag Hammadi coptic to the Original Greek. The monsters of Plato's ancient fables "have now become natural creatures", and are loose in the Republic presented in the Nag Hammadi version. Once they existed as many fabulous monsters in tales, but now they have become a single monster. Once the subject of tales in Plato, in the Coptic these monsters (now a single monster - the Christian State Canonical Book Religion) lived in the empire, and it was commanded to work in the empire. Things were grim for the non christians.

In the NHC Trimorphic Protennoia and other Gnostic texts, fully developed Neoplatonism is employed and thus these need to be dated after Plotinus.

In the many NHC texts seen to Sethian and Valentinian, we may be seeing the signature of such groups in exile from 4th century Alexandria, attempting to contend with the imperially motivated "Christianization" of the major cities, and of course the commissioning of the new "City of Constantine".


I rest my case for the identification of "Monty Pythonish" satire and parody
as a consistent polemical signature within the corpus of the new testament
gnostic gospels and acts, etc.

mountainman is offline  
Old 04-07-2011, 12:44 AM   #214
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Most recent article .... in summary of all foregoing discussions

An alternative chronology for the lost authorship of the Gnostic Gospels
A critical examination and analysis of the manuscript evidence debunking the idea of "early Christian" authorship.

<snip>

I rest my case for the identification of "Monty Pythonish" satire and parody
as a consistent polemical signature within the corpus of the new testament
gnostic gospels and acts, etc.
This is not a critical examination. It is just your laundry list of things in the gnostic gospels that you don't understand. If there is parody there, it is parody from the gnostic point of view, not the pagan point of view.

For example, the gospel of Philip says that Jesus kissed Mary on the (probably lips) - because kissing on the lips was a metaphor for transmitting teaching. Why is this in your list?

If you have rested your case, I hope that means you will not bring it up any more.
Toto is offline  
Old 04-07-2011, 03:37 AM   #215
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Most recent article .... in summary of all foregoing discussions

An alternative chronology for the lost authorship of the Gnostic Gospels
A critical examination and analysis of the manuscript evidence debunking the idea of "early Christian" authorship.

<snip>

I rest my case for the identification of "Monty Pythonish" satire and parody
as a consistent polemical signature within the corpus of the new testament
gnostic gospels and acts, etc.
This is not a critical examination.
The critical examination and analysis of the manuscript evidence, of which the identification of common satire is but a small part, is presented in the paper referenced above, which you have probably not read.

Quote:
It is just your laundry list of things in the gnostic gospels that you don't understand.

I understand the humor as "Monty Pythonish" satire directed by the author(s) of the entire collection of gnostic gospels and acts, against the characters who appear in the Constantine Bible at Nicaea. But maybe you just dont get any of the jokes ... did you see the remarks by Epiphanius about The Apocalypse of Paul?



Quote:
If there is parody there, it is parody from the gnostic point of view, not the pagan point of view.

What's the difference?
mountainman is offline  
Old 04-07-2011, 03:58 AM   #216
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 5,746
Default

One of the biggest problems of Christianity when Rome was abouit to officially convert to it was that the various Bibles had been written in such pedestrian language. This then would imply that those who wrote the Bible did know how to write, but didn't belong to any elites.
DrZoidberg is offline  
Old 04-07-2011, 08:58 AM   #217
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post

This is not a critical examination.
The critical examination and analysis of the manuscript evidence, of which the identification of common satire is but a small part, is presented in the paper referenced above, which you have probably not read.
I started, but it is unreadable.

Quote:
I understand the humor as "Monty Pythonish" satire directed by the author(s) of the entire collection of gnostic gospels and acts, against the characters who appear in the Constantine Bible at Nicaea. But maybe you just dont get any of the jokes ... did you see the remarks by Epiphanius about The Apocalypse of Paul?
The Monty Python humorists were actually a fan of the historical Jesus, so even if this were "Monty Pythonist" I don't know what your point is.

You wrote
In The Apocalypse of Paul, some Gnostic wanted equal rights. Either Paul or Mary (depending on the versions) persuades God to give everyone in Hell a day off every Sunday. In the later 4th century Epiphanius refers to this as "a forged book full of unspeakable matter in the name of Paul".. Obviously Epiphanius couldn't see the joke.
I guess I don't either. Nor does any other commentator. Besides, it seems that you are confusing the Apocalypse of Paul, where everyone in Hell gets a partial commutation of their sentences, with the Coptic Apolacypse of Paul, which was a Sethian document attacked by Epiphanius.

Quote:
Quote:
If there is parody there, it is parody from the gnostic point of view, not the pagan point of view.
What's the difference?
A parody from the gnostic, or unorthodox Christian point of view does not support your weird redating of history.
Toto is offline  
Old 04-07-2011, 10:09 AM   #218
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Iceland
Posts: 761
Default

What is the earliest manuscript that talks about or is supposed to be by Eusebius? I have this crazy theory that he was actually made up during the late middle ages to support the catholic church. :Cheeky:
hjalti is offline  
Old 04-08-2011, 06:48 AM   #219
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hjalti View Post
What is the earliest manuscript that talks about or is supposed to be by Eusebius? I have this crazy theory that he was actually made up during the late middle ages to support the catholic church. :Cheeky:
There is a Syriac version of Eusebius' church history dated 462 CE see for example Eusebius Church History
Quote:
Translations of Eusebius’ History are very numerous. Probably the earliest of all is the ancient Syriac version which is preserved in great part in two mss., one of which is at St. Petersburg and contains the entire History with the exception of Book VI. and large portions of Books V. and VII. The ms. is dated 462 a.d. (see Wright’s description of it in his Catalogue of the Syriac mss. in the British Museum acquired since the year 1838, Part III. p. xv. sq.). The second ms. is in the British Museum, and contains Books I.–V., with some mutilations at the beginning of the first book. The ms. dates from the sixth century (see Wright’s description of it in his Catalogue, p. 1039).
Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 04-20-2011, 06:54 AM   #220
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hjalti View Post
What is the earliest manuscript that talks about or is supposed to be by Eusebius? I have this crazy theory that he was actually made up during the late middle ages to support the catholic church. :Cheeky:
Hey hjalti,

Sounds like Athanasius Kircher and the Abbe Hardouin, who (in the hope of disarming the protestant appeal to primitive Christianity) argued that the whole corpus of ancient literature, including the Fathers, up to about 900 CE is a forgery. However we can immediately dismiss this theory because of the C14 results centered on 280 CE and 348 CE. Something was going on around this epoch, because "Gnostic Gospels" were being physically manufactured.

However I think your "crazy theory" is viable when applied to the epoch which concluded in the mid 5th century, at which time all of the histories of the 4th century were reportedly already written.

Eusebius had many continuators but no rivals

The continuators of Eusebius can be listed. They both continued the history of the church from the Council of Nicaea, where Eusebius history finishes, and they preserved Eusebius's literature. I think Eusebius existed, but that the writings we have from him have been perverted by later preservers.

Best wishes,


Pete
mountainman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:29 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.