![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#91 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Harrisburg, Pa
Posts: 3,251
|
![]()
If one is capable of killing one's grandfather then one has entered a timeline in which one won't be born.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#92 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Home.
Posts: 653
|
![]() Quote:
Time is a concept that is based on the workings of our universe. What makes you think its applicable outside the universe? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#93 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 3,397
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#94 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 3,397
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#95 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Home.
Posts: 653
|
![]() Quote:
Where do you draw the line? I think Draygomb has drawn a good boundary with his argument. Beyond time, then forget about it. Just my two cents. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#96 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: http://10.0.0.2/
Posts: 6,623
|
![]()
Here's something interesting to add to the mix: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4974134.stm
|
![]() |
![]() |
#97 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey, U.K.
Posts: 2,864
|
![]()
"Any Sort of God
I remember a while back, I asked Draygomb if his proof refutes every sort of God " If we multiply Gods sufficiently (and in the process offend against Occam's Razor), then we can drown atheistic arguments by claiming that not all of these Gods' existences can be disproved, because one cannot completely search every corner of the Universe, or outside of the Universe. But this is just a game of one-upmanship,-one can always add on another God and then say "ya sucks boo,-now disprove that one! I think there is something wrong with that approach (like Shifting the Burden of Proof). But more seriously there is an identity problem for God. If every sort of God exists, then in order to be separately identifiable as individual Gods they must have different attributes; but if God is already defined as that which nothing greater can be imagined (according to the Ontological Argument),-then any other individual God cannot also be totally perfect in every way, otherwise he would be the twin of the traditional God,and all the other sorts of Gods would be their identical siblings. So in other words, different sorts of Gods cannot exist, without being demoted to entities like the traditional lesser gods of polytheistic religions, who were generally subservient to the great God,-just as Aphrodite would be subservient to Zeus. Therefore we are stuck with just the one perfect God and Dragomb need not bother with "any sort of God". |
![]() |
![]() |
#98 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey, U.K.
Posts: 2,864
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#99 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey, U.K.
Posts: 2,864
|
![]()
"I am also criticising his view that it disproves all definitions of God that 'matter'."
What is the definition of a God that "matters"? Is it the omnimax God?--then surely that is the one we have been discussing. |
![]() |
![]() |
#100 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey, U.K.
Posts: 2,864
|
![]()
"Hence, either time is substance, and Draygomb is required to meet a burden and revise his definition of time, or time is a relation and Draygomb is required to revise his assertion that God created time (RAA Assumption) purposely and directly."
Surely the validity of the space-time concept is a matter for Physicists to sort out,-and not for Dragomb to have to prove? Whether Time is a relation or a substance still leaves the issue of Space unresolved. God also needs space in which to exist, and if there was no space, how did God himself exist and begin to create space which did not exist before he created it? The Christian response is so obvious: you just have special God-space and special God-Time, outside of the Universe of normal space-time. The only problem is, where is the scientific evidence for this? It is just multiplying entities again, so as to keep ahead of atheist arguments. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|