FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-25-2006, 05:30 PM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

I thought that the only one who dated Clement that early (other than Christians who date everything early) was Alvar Ellegard in Jesus: One Hundred Years Before Christ (or via: amazon.co.uk), searchable on Amazon.

The consensus dating appears to depend on Eusebius.
Toto is offline  
Old 04-25-2006, 05:42 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

George Edmundson argued for a date of 70 for 1 Clement in his Bampton Lectures of 1913. The published book of his lectures, The Church in Rome in the First Century, is available online. He discusses the date of 1 Clement in the seventh lecture. Interestingly, in that same lecture he is happy to date the Didache to century IV. Century IV!

J. A. T. Robinson references Edmundson several times in Redating the New Testament.

Edmundson takes virtually every thread of early church tradition quite seriously, BTW.

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 04-25-2006, 06:51 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

There are scholars other than Robinson, Ellegard, and Edmundson who argue for a pre-destruction date of 1 Clement.

Here is the thread I may have had in mind.

Here is another thread.

I take exception to the typical smear of Robinson. Rather than a hidebound conservative (though those types like to misuse him), he's a maverick, attempting to push the limits of scholarship. His is a mirror image of the Dutch Radical chronology, with all the same mannerism and rationality, just with the conclusions reversed.

regards,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 04-25-2006, 10:06 PM   #14
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 37
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChandraRama
Thanks. The question is related to the Mack's book on Who wrote the New testament. I like to see if there is any evidence on the prewar jesus movements. (in a roundabout way)
An answer has already been given; Pauls epistles. I'm curious as to what this means for your investigations? Are you trying to find out whether an christian movements even existed pre-war? Or the nature of them?
james-2-24 is offline  
Old 04-26-2006, 11:24 AM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 9,159
Default

First Clement is obviously a spurious liturgical tract masquerading as a letter wherin the motivation (buried so deeply amidst the vague piffle about some crisis in leadership) is to order subservience of churches to central authority.

Christian Bishops in mid first century? Sure, sure. That's why Josephus and other historians spilled so much ink on this big movement. Their parades were so large they had to close off the streets.

Vespasian was forced to negotiate with the Christian Bishop's Council in the famous Treaty of Flavianum, presided over by the Easter Bunny and Paul Bunyan.
rlogan is offline  
Old 04-30-2006, 08:26 AM   #16
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: US
Posts: 107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by james-2-24
An answer has already been given; Pauls epistles. I'm curious as to what this means for your investigations? Are you trying to find out whether an christian movements even existed pre-war? Or the nature of them?
I was curious to find out if the christ movements rose independent of the historical jesus movements. And if they converged at some point. Jesus puzzle and the Mack's book on the "who wrote New testament" hints at this possibility.
ChandraRama is offline  
Old 04-30-2006, 12:30 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChandraRama
I was curious to find out if the christ movements rose independent of the historical jesus movements. And if they converged at some point. Jesus puzzle and the Mack's book on the "who wrote New testament" hints at this possibility.
If you remember that "Christ" is simply the Greek translation of "Messiah", then your question becomes, "were there those who believed in the Messiah, independent of those who believed in Jesus as the Messiah?" To which the answer seems to be "yes, but..." There were many different conceptions of the Messiah or Son of Man or archangel that was to come. For some Jews, the Messiah wasn't an important concept at all, however. (IIRC, Philo never uses the term.)

In any case, Jesus's followers drew on a wide spectrum of such ideas (one scholar says they "ransacked the available categories" - a beautifully apt phrase), and reinterpreted them to apply to Jesus.
robto is offline  
Old 04-30-2006, 06:56 PM   #18
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: US
Posts: 107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robto
If you remember that "Christ" is simply the Greek translation of "Messiah", then your question becomes, "were there those who believed in the Messiah, independent of those who believed in Jesus as the Messiah?" .
messiah means oiled. But what does exactly christ means in greek?
ChandraRama is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:41 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.