Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-23-2005, 12:15 PM | #11 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Quote:
|
|
10-23-2005, 02:34 PM | #12 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Get real. A lot of people here hold that position as do many of the writers in the Sec Web library. Look at the flack I have taken for even suggesting that the witch trials and inqusition numbers are a fraction of what the legands state. Look at the flack you gave me for even suggesting that Christianity didn't hold back science. By the way, you asked me for a reference to lightning rods. Some advice: 1) When you ask someone to dig up a reference for you, it's polite to say thank you. 2) Don't bother ask for references if you have no intention of chasing them up. 3) If you have checked the reference, then its a good idea to let people know what you found. These simple steps will avoid you appearing as a rude bastard. Best wishes Bede |
|
10-23-2005, 03:02 PM | #13 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
I still give you "flack" for suggesting that Christianity didn't hold back science because it still did! You, however, have been switching your arguments in mid-debate to baseless strawmen such as what you've done here and the "What if Christianity never existed" thread. It went from Christianity didn't hold back science to Christianity didn't hold back all of science and even Look! other religions did the same. Exaggeration? I never gave you flack about quelling exaggerations - ALL things are exaggerated. But to suggest that our exaggerations let Christianity off the hook is quite ludicrous and perposterous. You apologies for the horrible systematic annihilation of "heretics" is appalling, regardless of whether the Church killed one billion or one hundred.
1) I'm sorry, but I don't recall where I asked you for that. I lost track of the huge "What if Christianity..." thread many posts back, seeing the debate as worthless, futile, and moot. Perhaps a kind PM suggesting I respond to something wouldn't be too difficult, no? 2) Intentions change. 3) Once again, I haven't even looked inside that particular thread in a while. Please refresh my memory so I can fulfill this obligation. best regards, A Very Rude Bastard |
10-23-2005, 03:55 PM | #14 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,969
|
Quote:
Except for the single cite in his article, I have never heard anyone claim "millions" during the middle ages. And other than a strawman over exact numbers, the research he cites seems to SUPPORT the contentions I have heard with regard to persecutions of people for witchcraft during the Middle Ages. (Outside the scope of this article, but most Wiccans I've met don't confine it to the Middle Ages, either.) |
|
10-24-2005, 01:07 AM | #15 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
10-24-2005, 01:14 AM | #16 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey, U.K.
Posts: 2,864
|
Quote:
|
|
10-24-2005, 03:32 AM | #17 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
B |
|
10-24-2005, 07:10 AM | #18 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey, U.K.
Posts: 2,864
|
Quote:
|
|
10-24-2005, 08:06 AM | #19 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
|
It is sooooo tempting to refer to the OT genocides here.
Clearly the Christians failed to live up to God's high standards. They failed to kill ALL the "witches". |
10-24-2005, 12:47 PM | #20 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
|
Quote:
Radical American feminists such as Mary Daly who use this figure, probanly derived it from Gage rather than from German sources of the Nazi era. Andrew Criddle |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|