FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-26-2005, 06:46 AM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Celsus
Can I plead insanity based on loss of braincells caused by today's events and desire to fit a nice number? Anyway, thanks for the lesson... One day I'll actually remember all this.

Kilsho... er, Celsus
So you have been drinking: loss of braincells is a sure sign -- either drinking or listening to the Shrub.

Anyway, moving right along, Jesus, if we retro-transliterate, would be Y$W$ (the "e" in this case would be mater lectionis and therefore not need to be written). Y$W$ is 10 + 300 + 6 + 300 = 616, the alternative reading found in the manuscript tradition for 666.

(And Vork, you're going to spin out with all that rolling around.)


spin
spin is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 05:10 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: home
Posts: 3,715
Default

spin, as much as I enjoyed your response to the OP, I must comment that using the higher values for the final forms of K, M, N, P and C isn't something that is done consistently, and using the values for the regular form is acceptable. Thus for example, the Hebrew years of 5740 and 5750 were written with the final forms of M and N respectively. People who didn't like to see 5744 written as T$MD sometimes wrote it T$DM, with the final M (not that the alternate form has a more positive meaning; hence the other alternative - $DMT).

As for Joel, maybe he will be encouraged to find that his real name, if I have it correctly, adds up to a nice, perfect 100.

620
Anat is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 05:19 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 4,822
Default

What's Agnostic Beast in this gematria thingy?
Agnostic Theist is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 05:23 PM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anat
spin, as much as I enjoyed your response to the OP, I must comment that using the higher values for the final forms of K, M, N, P and C isn't something that is done consistently, and using the values for the regular form is acceptable.
[Edited to add:] Yet supplies very different values, rendering the process of significance to whom?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anat
Thus for example, the Hebrew years of 5740 and 5750 were written with the final forms of M and N respectively. People who didn't like to see 5744 written as T$MD sometimes wrote it T$DM, with the final M (not that the alternate form has a more positive meaning; hence the other alternative - $DMT).
Fields?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anat
As for Joel, maybe he will be encouraged to find that his real name, if I have it correctly, adds up to a nice, perfect 100.

620
This is starting to sound a little like something written by Yevgeny Zamyatin.


440
spin is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 05:34 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: home
Posts: 3,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
Fields?
$D MT -> Dead demon, or a demon died.
Anat is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 06:28 PM   #16
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anat
$D MT -> Dead demon, or a demon died.
Never would have thought of that, but I do ponder on the notion that $D can mean 1. destruction, 2. demon, and 3. breast. In those discourses about the wickedness of women, I don't remember any word plays using $D. I might have to go and check it out.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 08:20 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agnostic Beast
What's Agnostic Beast in this gematria thingy?
) 1
G 3
N 50
W 6
S 60
+ 9
Y 10
K 500

B 2
Y 10
S 60
T 400

= 1111

You are clearly a marked man.

666/100
Celsus is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 08:57 PM   #18
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anat
As for Joel, maybe he will be encouraged to find that his real name, if I have it correctly, adds up to a nice, perfect 100.

620
I think you're working on a different mathematical system from me. I would think that (NT would be 70 + 50 + 400 = 520.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 02-26-2005, 09:53 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: home
Posts: 3,715
Default

Oops. (I think I was confused by my real name...)
Anat is offline  
Old 02-27-2005, 07:23 AM   #20
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

I wonder when the Aramaic gematria was derived from geometry. I thought that geometry was coined in the renaissance, but I now discover that it goes back to antiquity. Herodotus uses it, though specifically for land measurement, as is the case with Aristophanes, the Clouds. The question must be, when did geometry become abstracted. In Greek Egypt it took on the meaning of land tax, obviously based on the measurement of the land. Cicero used it and I think that was the abstract partner to mathematics...

Yet, now I find in Jastrow's Dictionary of the Targumim, he claims that it comes from a corruption of grammatia (plural of grammateion), originally meaning "accounts". This could be correct and the notion of "divine geometry" only folk etymology. Jastrow indicates that Berakot 8a was already using letters based on their numerical values.


spin
spin is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:24 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.