FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-18-2012, 06:36 PM   #51
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
As far as healing goes, im suprised your missing the boat so bad on this. The bible is full of healing without ooogedy boogedy spirit cleansing.
I don't think so. Illnesses were associated with sin fairly uniformly.

Quote:
Why do you think they have Laws not just rules, that after touching certain things, you are required to wash. ???? because they knew it was unhealthy and washed themselves. Cleanliness and Germ theory are two different things.
That was ritual cleanliness, not sterility.


Quote:
The Hebrews were aware of the fact that contagious diseases are spread by direct contact as well as by clothing, household utensils, etc. To prevent the spread of epidemics or infectious maladies they therefore compiled a series of sanitary regulations
....
Modern people like to claim that the Bible is rational, not just silly superstitions. In fact, some traditions probably helped the survival of the society, but for reasons unrelated to their purpose.

Traditional concepts of contagion
Toto is offline  
Old 12-18-2012, 06:37 PM   #52
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post

But you never get the idea from the gospels that there was a lack of food.

Because the rich Roman authors did not highlight the poverty they severely inflicted.

Roman oppression is the key word here. They were masters of bleeding cultures dry, stopping only short of death, choking their victims to the point of turning purple.
Source?
Toto is offline  
Old 12-18-2012, 07:17 PM   #53
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post


Because the rich Roman authors did not highlight the poverty they severely inflicted.

Roman oppression is the key word here. They were masters of bleeding cultures dry, stopping only short of death, choking their victims to the point of turning purple.
Source?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Mark

Mark wrote primarily for an audience of gentile Greek-speaking residents of the Roman Empire: Jewish traditions are explained, clearly for the benefit of non-Jews


That takes care of Roman authors/scribes



http://www.awesomestories.com/movies...christ_ch2.htm

When Herod died, in 4 BC - his long-sought tomb was finally located in May of 2007 - Roman oppression of the Jews worsened dramatically. By 6 AD, Judea was a Roman province where the tax burden imposed on the Jews became nearly unbearable.
outhouse is offline  
Old 12-19-2012, 01:01 AM   #54
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Ahem. Your "source" is the summary of a movie that embodies Christian mythology. The footnote to your quote does not exactly support your conclusion:

http://www.livius.org/ja-jn/jewish_wars/jwar02.html

Quote:
There are no indications that the Roman money taxes were higher than the taxes they replaced; this would have been impossible, because under the old tax decree the tax rate had already been 19,3% - extremely high in any agrarian society. (In 17 CE, a Jewish embassy appealed to the emperor Tiberius for a reduction in the tribute of Judaea.)

However, taxes in money were more onerous than taxes in kind, because a farmer had to borrow in case of a poor harvest. Besides, any Roman coin would bear an image of the goddess Roma or a legend saying that the man represented was the divine emperor: a violation of at least two of the ten commandments.
The pagan symbols on the coins seem to be the basis of the revolt, not the high taxes.
Quote:
A Pharisee named Zadok and a scribe from Galilee named Judas of Gamala said that this taxation was equivalent to the introduction of slavery, and exhorted the Jews to assert their liberty. Their program was simple: God was Israel's only lord, and it was blasphemous to pay tribute to anyone else - including the Roman emperor.
Toto is offline  
Old 12-19-2012, 05:49 AM   #55
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
Roman oppression is the key word here. They were masters of bleeding cultures dry, stopping only short of death, choking their victims to the point of turning purple.
Are you sure about that?

See if you can get your hands upon a copy of Fabian Udoh's To Caesar What Is Caesar's: Tribute, Taxes, and Imperial Administration in Early Roman Palestine 63 B.C.E to 70 C.E. (or via: amazon.co.uk) (2006). It will likely be available in a decently stocked university library. I actually got a copy of his Doctoral Dissertation (Duke, 1996), upon which the book is based, via inter-library loan.

Contents
Preface and Acknowledgments ix
Abbreviations xi
Introduction 1
1 Roman Tribute in Jewish Palestine
under Pompey (63-47 b.c.e.) 9
Cicero, Dio Cassius, and Appian 12
Cicero 12
Dio Cassius 17
Appian 18
Tribute and Exactions 22
Conclusion 30
2 Caesar's Favors (47-44 b.c.e.) 31
Tribute: For the City of Jerusalem, and for the City of Joppa 41
Tribute for the City of Joppa 45
Tribute for the City of Jerusalem 48
Further Reductions, Collection 52
Local Taxes 57
Territorial Grants: Joppa, "The Villages in the Great Plain,"
and Lydda 60
The Senate, Joppa, and the Plain of Sharon 68
Joppa, "The Villages in the Great Plain," and Lydda 71
Grants of Freedom: Billeting, Military Service,
and Molestation 75
Billeting 76
Military Service 79
Molestation: Angareia, the Temple Tax 82
3 Cassius and Antony in the East (43-40 b.c.e.) 100
Cassius in Syria (43-42 b.c.e.) 101
After Philippi: Antony and the Jewish State (42-31 b.c.e.) 108
4 Herodian Taxation (37 b.c.e.-4 b.c.e.) 113
The Herods and Roman Tribute 190
Roman Tribute and the Status of Judea 122
Appian's Bell. civ. 5.75 and Herod's Appointment 137
A King's Accounting 143
Herod's Taxes 159
Land and Property Taxes 162
The "Head Tax" 164
Tolls and Duties on Goods in Transit 171
Sales Taxes 175
House Tax 177
Epilogue 180
5 Taxation of Judea under the Governors 207
Judea and the Provincial Census 208
Judea and Provincial Taxes 219
Tributum Soli 221
Tributum Capitis 223
Other Taxes and the System of Collection 238
Conclusions 241
6 Tithes in the Second Temple Period 244
Tithes: For Priests or for Levites? 245
Biblical Laws and Postexilic Harmonizations 245
"First Tithes" to Priests and to Levites 248
Num 18:21-32; Lev 27:30-33 in Ezra/Nehemiah's
Restoration 258
Centralized Collection 263
Offered also to Individual Priests and Levites 273
Tithes of Livestock 275
Summary and Conclusion 277
Epilogue 279
Bibliography 289
DCHindley is offline  
Old 12-19-2012, 06:26 AM   #56
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
The pagan symbols on the coins seem to be the basis of the revolt, not the high taxes.
The temple tax shekels also bore pagan images (originally minted in Tyre). Keep in mind that the Roman poll tax was one denarius (= one silver drachma, 1/4 of a shekel used to pay temple tax), and probably only covered the cost of conducting it. The temple authority, including the HP and the land still under its control (which was alotted to familys based on long tradition) would now be subject to the Roman prefect.

Romans tended to NOT interfere with the management of land of those temples under their authority (although they occasionally confiscated some of it if the revenues seemed to exceed the amounts required to maintain the temple building and the priests, to prevent the temples from influencing politics). Only occupants of land under temple control were subject to tithes.

Royal land and land under control of elites leased the land to tenant farmers who paid "in kind" (that is, in grain and produce). As elites were generally exempt from Roman land taxes, the rents would not change that much. There is no evidence that the rent charged for royal land changed that much under Roman control from what the Herods charged before 6 CE.

I think it was the fact that the Roman prefect, as the local representative of the Emperor, would be in ultimate control of temple policy, rather than the HP, who was God's representative.

DCH
DCHindley is offline  
Old 12-19-2012, 08:25 AM   #57
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCHindley View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
Roman oppression is the key word here. They were masters of bleeding cultures dry, stopping only short of death, choking their victims to the point of turning purple.
Are you sure about that?

See if you can get your hands upon a copy of Fabian Udoh's To Caesar What Is Caesar's: Tribute, Taxes, and Imperial Administration in Early Roman Palestine 63 B.C.E to 70 C.E. (or via: amazon.co.uk) (2006). It will likely be available in a decently stocked university library. I actually got a copy of his Doctoral Dissertation (Duke, 1996), upon which the book is based, via inter-library loan.

Contents
Preface and Acknowledgments ix
Abbreviations xi
Introduction 1
1 Roman Tribute in Jewish Palestine
under Pompey (63-47 b.c.e.) 9
Cicero, Dio Cassius, and Appian 12
Cicero 12
Dio Cassius 17
Appian 18
Tribute and Exactions 22
Conclusion 30
2 Caesar's Favors (47-44 b.c.e.) 31
Tribute: For the City of Jerusalem, and for the City of Joppa 41
Tribute for the City of Joppa 45
Tribute for the City of Jerusalem 48
Further Reductions, Collection 52
Local Taxes 57
Territorial Grants: Joppa, "The Villages in the Great Plain,"
and Lydda 60
The Senate, Joppa, and the Plain of Sharon 68
Joppa, "The Villages in the Great Plain," and Lydda 71
Grants of Freedom: Billeting, Military Service,
and Molestation 75
Billeting 76
Military Service 79
Molestation: Angareia, the Temple Tax 82
3 Cassius and Antony in the East (43-40 b.c.e.) 100
Cassius in Syria (43-42 b.c.e.) 101
After Philippi: Antony and the Jewish State (42-31 b.c.e.) 108
4 Herodian Taxation (37 b.c.e.-4 b.c.e.) 113
The Herods and Roman Tribute 190
Roman Tribute and the Status of Judea 122
Appian's Bell. civ. 5.75 and Herod's Appointment 137
A King's Accounting 143
Herod's Taxes 159
Land and Property Taxes 162
The "Head Tax" 164
Tolls and Duties on Goods in Transit 171
Sales Taxes 175
House Tax 177
Epilogue 180
5 Taxation of Judea under the Governors 207
Judea and the Provincial Census 208
Judea and Provincial Taxes 219
Tributum Soli 221
Tributum Capitis 223
Other Taxes and the System of Collection 238
Conclusions 241
6 Tithes in the Second Temple Period 244
Tithes: For Priests or for Levites? 245
Biblical Laws and Postexilic Harmonizations 245
"First Tithes" to Priests and to Levites 248
Num 18:21-32; Lev 27:30-33 in Ezra/Nehemiah's
Restoration 258
Centralized Collection 263
Offered also to Individual Priests and Levites 273
Tithes of Livestock 275
Summary and Conclusion 277
Epilogue 279
Bibliography 289


Ill see if I can get that.



But im sure.

Recent scholarships have overturned that. But I use the term overturned loosely. Crossen, Meyers, Borg, Reed. All claim a very oppressed poverty stricken Galilee. While others, [names on the tip of my toungue] say it wasnt so impoverished.


I dont think its a dead split, but scholarships are split on this.
outhouse is offline  
Old 12-19-2012, 08:27 AM   #58
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Ahem. Your "source" is the summary of a movie that embodies Christian mythology. The footnote to your quote does not exactly support your conclusion:

http://www.livius.org/ja-jn/jewish_wars/jwar02.html

Quote:
There are no indications that the Roman money taxes were higher than the taxes they replaced; this would have been impossible, because under the old tax decree the tax rate had already been 19,3% - extremely high in any agrarian society. (In 17 CE, a Jewish embassy appealed to the emperor Tiberius for a reduction in the tribute of Judaea.)

However, taxes in money were more onerous than taxes in kind, because a farmer had to borrow in case of a poor harvest. Besides, any Roman coin would bear an image of the goddess Roma or a legend saying that the man represented was the divine emperor: a violation of at least two of the ten commandments.
The pagan symbols on the coins seem to be the basis of the revolt, not the high taxes.
Quote:
A Pharisee named Zadok and a scribe from Galilee named Judas of Gamala said that this taxation was equivalent to the introduction of slavery, and exhorted the Jews to assert their liberty. Their program was simple: God was Israel's only lord, and it was blasphemous to pay tribute to anyone else - including the Roman emperor.


You best check a few records, the fall of the temple was over taxation, and the war in Galilee when Joshua was a child was over taxes.


The thing is both wars were started knowing full well they had no chance at winning. They knew it was suicide, but fought anyway.

For oppressed people to do this, it had to be pretty bad.
outhouse is offline  
Old 12-19-2012, 09:19 AM   #59
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
...

For oppressed people to do this, it had to be pretty bad.
Oppressed financially - or religious fanatics who thought g-d would rescue them?

A revolt of the impoverished revolutionary workers and peasants fits a Marxist paradigm, but it doesn't seem to fit the facts very well. If you study history, revolutions tend to happen when economic conditions are improving. People who are desperately poor don't have the energy to stage a revolt.
Toto is offline  
Old 12-19-2012, 09:22 AM   #60
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
...

Recent scholarships have overturned that. But I use the term overturned loosely. Crossen, Meyers, Borg, Reed. All claim a very oppressed poverty stricken Galilee. While others, [names on the tip of my toungue] say it wasnt so impoverished.


I dont think its a dead split, but scholarships are split on this.
Please stop this random name dropping. If you claim that "recent scholarships" have come to a certain conclusion, you need an actual citation - name, publication, and the conclusion.
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:35 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.