Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-14-2008, 02:07 PM | #21 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
|
Quote:
Ben. PS: I actually meant to write that I think of science as a discipline involving (a collection) method(s), but no matter. It was a minor point to begin with. |
|
11-14-2008, 05:46 PM | #22 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
Scientific theories are not developed on guesses or faith-based beliefs, scientific theories are tested rigorously using available information and specialised equipment. There is just no comparison between faith-based untested beliefs to scientific theories. The internet is not a miracle, it is a product of scientific theories tested and proven. |
|
11-14-2008, 07:12 PM | #23 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
I guess, formally, "Axioms and postulates are the basic assumptions underlying a given body of deductive knowledge. They are accepted without demonstration. All other assertions (theorems, if we are talking about mathematics) must be proven with the aid of the basic assumptions."
An Axiom is a self-evident assumption. They are self evident because they conform to our collective experiences. This is what we "know". Certain basic hypotheses that had to be accepted without proof are known as Postulates. Postulates thus serve as common-sensical facts drawn from our experience. A Theorem is a formula in mathematics which is proven from other formulae, or from a given set of axioms, propositions and postulates. So everything derives from "facts" we expect from experience. The formula 2 + 2 = 4 is a theorem that is proved from axioms, or postulates derived from axioms, that are accepted without demonstration. The axioms are just assumed, but not without collective assent. We can question the validity of our experiences or of our interpretation of them, or even question whether our experience is all there is to reality, but all we have to go on are what we have experienced. It seems to me that all attempts to explain "miracles" fall into one or the other of these two categories. DCH (Damn, I'm sounding a lot like Chili) Quote:
|
||
11-15-2008, 06:53 AM | #24 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
"For all according to what is present does mindfulness grow in men [and] as they change into another nature so too does thinking come to them in other ways." From this would follow that miracles are beyond our judgement and are best left to the beholder of the same, which then also means that we should not be perplexed by them as seniors. |
|
11-16-2008, 11:17 AM | #25 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
See? But I digress.
In my humble opinion, Empedocles appears to say, as the old Pennsylvania Dutch proverb goes: "Ve get too soon olt, und too late schmart." Apologies to the unlearned for leaving this pearl of wisdom untranslated. DCH Quote:
|
||
11-16-2008, 01:56 PM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Lucky for me that I am Dutch but maturity has little to do with age and more with bringing the cows home often so they soon know the voice of their master.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|