FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-14-2008, 02:07 PM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gstafleu View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben C Smith View Post
I think of science as a (collection of) method(s) which, when used appropriately, can turn an hypothesis into a theory.
I think we have various uses of the word "science" here. What you refer to is, more strictly, the scientific method--but this is often just called "science." When I say that science is a theory, I refer to the collective of all scientific theories, this collective forming a new theory (like the theory of gravity and the theory of electromagnetism are part of the theory of physics, which is part of the theory we call science).
Okay, but I think Chili has your number here.

Ben.

PS: I actually meant to write that I think of science as a discipline involving (a collection) method(s), but no matter. It was a minor point to begin with.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 11-14-2008, 05:46 PM   #22
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCHindley View Post
As far as most of us have observed, 2 + 2 always = 4, but mathematicians acknowledge that this may not *always* be true.
Can please name a mathematician who claimed it is not always true that 2+2 is equal to 4?

Scientific theories are not developed on guesses or faith-based beliefs, scientific theories are tested rigorously using available information and specialised equipment.

There is just no comparison between faith-based untested beliefs to scientific theories.

The internet is not a miracle, it is a product of scientific theories tested and proven.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 11-14-2008, 07:12 PM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
Default

I guess, formally, "Axioms and postulates are the basic assumptions underlying a given body of deductive knowledge. They are accepted without demonstration. All other assertions (theorems, if we are talking about mathematics) must be proven with the aid of the basic assumptions."

An Axiom is a self-evident assumption. They are self evident because they conform to our collective experiences. This is what we "know". Certain basic hypotheses that had to be accepted without proof are known as Postulates. Postulates thus serve as common-sensical facts drawn from our experience. A Theorem is a formula in mathematics which is proven from other formulae, or from a given set of axioms, propositions and postulates.

So everything derives from "facts" we expect from experience. The formula 2 + 2 = 4 is a theorem that is proved from axioms, or postulates derived from axioms, that are accepted without demonstration. The axioms are just assumed, but not without collective assent.

We can question the validity of our experiences or of our interpretation of them, or even question whether our experience is all there is to reality, but all we have to go on are what we have experienced. It seems to me that all attempts to explain "miracles" fall into one or the other of these two categories.

DCH (Damn, I'm sounding a lot like Chili)

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCHindley View Post
As far as most of us have observed, 2 + 2 always = 4, but mathematicians acknowledge that this may not *always* be true.
Can please name a mathematician who claimed it is not always true that 2+2 is equal to 4?

Scientific theories are not developed on guesses or faith-based beliefs, scientific theories are tested rigorously using available information and specialised equipment.

There is just no comparison between faith-based untested beliefs to scientific theories.

The internet is not a miracle, it is a product of scientific theories tested and proven.
DCHindley is offline  
Old 11-15-2008, 06:53 AM   #24
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCHindley View Post
I guess, formally, "Axioms and postulates are the basic assumptions underlying a given body of deductive knowledge. They are accepted without demonstration.
Sure, and let me now add that just as finding the hole in tire before you can fix it is axiomatic so must miracles be when their logos finds completion in function by way of perception. This can be much after a line by Empedocles who is reported to have said:
"For all according to what is present does mindfulness grow in men [and] as they change into another nature so too does thinking come to them in other ways."

From this would follow that miracles are beyond our judgement and are best left to the beholder of the same, which then also means that we should not be perplexed by them as seniors.
Chili is offline  
Old 11-16-2008, 11:17 AM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
Default

See? But I digress.

In my humble opinion, Empedocles appears to say, as the old Pennsylvania Dutch proverb goes: "Ve get too soon olt, und too late schmart." Apologies to the unlearned for leaving this pearl of wisdom untranslated.

DCH

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCHindley View Post
I guess, formally, "Axioms and postulates are the basic assumptions underlying a given body of deductive knowledge. They are accepted without demonstration.
Sure, and let me now add that just as finding the hole in tire before you can fix it is axiomatic so must miracles be when their logos finds completion in function by way of perception. This can be much after a line by Empedocles who is reported to have said:
"For all according to what is present does mindfulness grow in men [and] as they change into another nature so too does thinking come to them in other ways."

From this would follow that miracles are beyond our judgement and are best left to the beholder of the same, which then also means that we should not be perplexed by them as seniors.
DCHindley is offline  
Old 11-16-2008, 01:56 PM   #26
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCHindley View Post
See? But I digress.

In my humble opinion, Empedocles appears to say, as the old Pennsylvania Dutch proverb goes: "Ve get too soon olt, und too late schmart." Apologies to the unlearned for leaving this pearl of wisdom untranslated.

DCH
Lucky for me that I am Dutch but maturity has little to do with age and more with bringing the cows home often so they soon know the voice of their master.
Chili is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:04 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.