FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Philosophy & Religious Studies > Moral Foundations & Principles
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-24-2007, 02:23 PM   #91
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Paisley, Scotland
Posts: 5,819
Default

I don't think egocentricity played any role in evolution and neither does selfishness IMHO. In this thread, read egocentric to mean that we all have personal views of the world.
JamesBannon is offline  
Old 06-24-2007, 07:06 PM   #92
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,884
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ephemerid View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheerful Charlie View Post
But support for regimes like Pinochet, Rios Montt, Pol Pot and killing 500,000 Iraqi children is not biblical.
Your mention of Pinochet reminds me of Pat Robertson saying Hugo Chavez should be assassinated.

When Rios Montt became dictator of Guatemala and instituted mass murder and genocide, Robertson made a number of trips down there to support Montt. Robertson has become a long time friend of Montt, despite the fact he was a genocidal bastard. Roberston used his media empire to spew pro-Montt propaganda as the Democrats tried to cut military aid to Guatemala.

Robertson enthusiastically support US efforts in El Slavador, support for the Contras, Pinochet and every other scumbag Reagan and Bush ever fawned over.

Of course he hates Chavez. Robertson has been a proper little fascist for decades. Falwell, recently dead, also was a repeat visiter to Montt. A large number of far right American evangelists supported Montt following this general lead. Before he was selected to head the goverment after a military coup, Montt was a minister and a religious teacher, a member of a scummy far right evangelical church in Guatemala. Reagan himself made a trip to Guatemala to appear on stage with Montt and sing his praises.

CC
Cheerful Charlie is offline  
Old 06-24-2007, 07:42 PM   #93
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,884
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverwind View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheerful Charlie View Post
The explanation is, there can be no explanation. The Universe exists as a brute fact with no cause, no why. We exist by luck with no why, no reason.

Its a brute fact and that is all you need to know.
Knowing this alone gets one nowhere in life. You must know how to function among the people you're placed alongside.
You mean shut up and let the scum support evil and not rock the boat? Not a chance. I am trying to figure how to rock this boat so hard a lot of people are going over board.

Evil policies from smirking politicians that assure us they are oh so religious is not acceptable. Evil far right religious leaders who are all for such policies is not acceptable. Useless religious leaders picking their noses and whimpering "We can't do anything about this really, we put out a press release but it didn't do any good!!" are not acceptable.

People like you who assure us we atheists have no basis for morality or caring about any of this is an insult and bigotry. I am happy I am not like you.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverwind View Post
[
Are you really getting the point of this whole thing, though, Charlie?
Evil is not acceptable. Mass murder, torture, genocide and brutality is not acceptable. The US government pursuing evil policies is not acceptable. Far right religions supporting evil is not acceptable. Powerful churches with millions of members who will not stand up and act decisively is not acceptable. Being told that I have no reason to dislike evil, mass murder, torture, oppression, and genocide because I a man atheist, is not acceptable. Telling anybody that is unacceptable.

I get this quite well. You are not getting this and don't seem to be willing to try.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverwind View Post
[
That is, are you really understanding what this means for your so-called 'morals'? Do you understand, yet, that your 'morals' are no better and no worse than those of the Christians you condemn? Do you understand that you have no guidebook of morals to point me to in order for me to somehow conform to what you think is 'good'?
I have morals. Many Christians do not, have not, will never have any.
They have been eagerly supporting these evils ever since they started voting.

American Christianity has a thirty five year history of failure, lack of moral leadership, and brains. Somebody smarter, more moral and righteous has to take these people by the hand and lead them, they can't make it on their own.

Do you understand that sad fact?

500,000 dead children. Why does that not seem to bother you in the very least? Why did it not bother hundreds of millions of Christians? Why do the politicians who supported this policy still hold office in a nation we are assured by ever so many Christians is indeed a Christian nation, despite what liberals and atheists say?

Cheerful Charlie
Cheerful Charlie is offline  
Old 06-24-2007, 07:59 PM   #94
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,884
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverwind View Post



No problem. There are many 'types' for sure, but I happen to believe that the majority of those 'types' share a core set of "fundamental saving beliefs". Nominally, I am a Southern Baptist, and that is the 'type' of church I attend. Some would call me a "fundamentalist" and some would not, but this is another term of generalization that doesn't really mean much. I would classify myself as a "fundamentalist" in the sense that I believe in the "fundamentals" of the Bible.
However, I would not classify myself as a "fundamentalist" in the sense that many seem to mean it in a derogatory sense these days...I rarely agreed with all the thoughts and methods of Falwell or several other of the very public Christian leaders. The only exception to that case, in my eyes, would be Billy Graham, whom I think the world of as an example of a 'good' Christian man.

The common fundamentals of the Bible, as I see them, are (1) Love God (and Jesus is the only way to God) and (2)Love your neighbor as yourself.
God commands in a number of verses that you do his commandments.
This includes commands to be righteous. To hate wickedness and evil. To stand up for the poor and powerless, and to despise those who oppress, kill, and steal. Help the hungery, the thirsty, the naked, the sick,or burn.

Read the Pslams, the Prophets, the gospels. Again and again and again, the Bible tells you that this is what you are to do.

Yet, Christians do not act when our own secretary of state announces she thinks killing 500,000 children is worth it. This is not righteouness.
16 million members and this denomination did not arise as one righteous man and try to halt these murders, this genocide.

As a Texan who has observed these schnooks (They are thick as fleas here) for years, I dislike the SBC very much because it has always supported people like Reagan and as far as I can see, never stood up once to these sorts of evils.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverwind View Post
[
This is how Jesus summed up the "Law" of the OT, so criticisms of other parts of it, as some attempt, mean little or nothing to most Christians.
Matthew 5. Til the earth and heavens pass away, not one jot nor tittle of the law shall pass away.

CC
Cheerful Charlie is offline  
Old 06-24-2007, 09:38 PM   #95
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Allen, Tx
Posts: 604
Default

Charlie, you have not made one single attempt that I can see to understand the things I've said. Instead, you repeat your ridiculous and bigotted mantra. I had hoped that you would engage in meaningful dialogue, but you would rather rail against your false perceptions of me and of my religion.

You fight ghosts and thus you will never win but continue uselessly swinging away at fallacious generalizations for the rest of your quite mortal life.

I won't say you're wrong about being offended by the deaths of so many, but I will ask what you've personally done for the people of Afghanistan and Iraq. I will ask exactly how much you care. Something tells me that you've invested little other than rhetoric, although I'd love to be proven wrong in that.

You may have 'morals', but you have yet to address any of the many difficult issues for your own beliefs that I've paraded before you. You and your 'morals' are no better (and no worse) than those of the Christians you condemn, and you are very much cousins of the very fundamentalists you condemn...they, too, blindly condemn those whom they don't really understand (and don't take the time to understand) and rarely think about the love of fellow-man that they so often meaninglessly blab on and on about. Are you sure you're not Johnny Skeptic reincarnate? You both harp on Christians, but when the focus turns to your own views, you both throw up defense shields and bow out of the discussion only to return later with more hatred for Christians. Bah...bigots...
Riverwind is offline  
Old 06-24-2007, 10:16 PM   #96
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Buenos Aires
Posts: 7,588
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverwind
This is one of my favorite seemingly thoughtless arguments. Many atheists/agnostics must point purely to biology...nothing more. What this means is that no one is to blame for any of their actions. Biology did it, not the person. No one is 'bad'. No one is 'good'. 'Biology' and 'nature' are just indifferent...and seemingly cruel to life.
Humans are not indifferent. We are part of nature, yes, but that doesn't mean we're indifferent. Plus, I never said it was genes alone, but a combination of genes and environmental factors.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverwind
So what do we do about these 'biological differences' that cause one person to kill 500,000 people and one to say that's 'immoral'? Nothing, because we're all just aberrations of biology? We can't control what we do...it's all biology. You can't blame the person for killing 500,000 people...he was bound to do it by nature.
First, the differences don't have to be genetic. In general, they aren't.
And that aside, of course people can blame them. People do blame them.

If they were bound by their own nature (I'm not sure what you exactly mean by "bound"), then the blamer would also bound to blame them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverwind
Now this...is anarchy. It takes a little more thought, I'm afraid.
You call that anarchy. As I mentioned before, there are societies that don't generally accept your god or gods, and they're not anarchic. Further, if you just considered other social animals, you'd realize that there's no anarchy because of a lack of belief in god.

What you fail to acknowledge is the fact that theism doesn't resolve any problems. You haven't address my arguments in that regard.

By your reasoning, are you saying that they care about the Iraqis because doing so benefits them (i.e., because they want to avoid punishment in the afterlife)?
If you're a theist, why should you care about the Iraqis? Because you think this entity that you call “God” says so?

Again, is it your view that theists help others only to avoid punishment in Hell?

Why do non-theists help others, then?

How do you account for the fact that people that don't believe in any deities, also care for others?
How do you account for the fact that societies where most people don't believe in your any deities, are not anarchic?
How do you account for the fact that groups of other social animals are not anarchic?
Angra Mainyu is offline  
Old 06-25-2007, 05:39 AM   #97
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: USA (but my heart is in New Zealand)
Posts: 125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angra Mainyu View Post
Again, is it your view that theists help others only to avoid punishment in Hell?
Or for their reward in heaven?
Ephemerid is offline  
Old 06-25-2007, 07:07 AM   #98
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,884
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverwind View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ephemerid View Post
You don't need a rational or pseudo-rational system of thought in order to recognise suffering.
No, but you do need one in order not to be indifferent.

No, you need one to be indifferent.You reasonforbeingindifferentistodemand peoloelgiveyoua rwasonm nottobeindiferentandthenrejectingall good reasons.

Including your own Biblical commands to care and to stand up against evil, wickedness,and oppression. Youarecommanded toberighteous. You claim to be a Baptist whom claims to believe in the Bible but you don't.

Of course many SBs claim they are the elect and saved and no matter how bad and evil they are, their election makes them saved, not their own efforts, their works, acts or attitudes. Baptists have always had a problems with election and antinomianism. Once saved, always saved.
This is what makes a lot of SBs such sorry human beings,and Ihaveknowna lot of SBs personally that wore their religions on their sleeves and yet were abject human scum. Oxygen theives.

This is not of course confined to Baptists, a lot of Christians do this. This is one reason Christianity is a moral failure. Calvinism has given many Christians license to not give a damn, or act decently.

CC
Cheerful Charlie is offline  
Old 06-25-2007, 07:53 AM   #99
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,884
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverwind View Post
Charlie, you have not made one single attempt that I can see to understand the things I've said. Instead, you repeat your ridiculous and bigotted mantra. I had hoped that you would engage in meaningful dialogue, but you would rather rail against your false perceptions of me and of my religion.
I understand you totally. I violently reject all your claims and ideas.
I do not like you. And I do not like people like you. I do not like religion as it spawns people like you by the tens of millions. There can be no dialogue with a person who is ineducable, irrational and bigoted.

Killing 500,000 children for nothing is not acceptable. That you will not admit this is evil, that our government that did this is evil for doing it, and that who support it with bad excuses or apathy are just as evil for allowing this and not making any real concentrated attempt to end it. Religious leaders with collective religious memberships of 100 million + members could have and made little effort to do so.

This is by all sane accounts, evil.

The only dialogue possible is to point out this is evil and watch you fail to agree. What you mean by dialogue here is that I am to soften my attitude on this sort of genocide and admit that maybe it isn't so evil after all, and no, that will never happen.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverwind View Post
You fight ghosts and thus you will never win but continue uselessly swinging away at fallacious generalizations for the rest of your quite mortal life.
I fight mass murder, mass torture, oppression, and genocide. To call these evils "fallacious generations" tells us a lot about you. Itis not pretty, or moral. 500,000 dead Iraqi children is not a generalization. Arguing that killing 500,000 children is fallacious is evil.
You claim to be a bible believing Southern Baptist. We see then that religionis indeed part of the problem, it does not automatically makes us thinking, moral human beings to be religious.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverwind View Post
I won't say you're wrong about being offended by the deaths of so many, but I will ask what you've personally done for the people of Afghanistan and Iraq. I will ask exactly how much you care. Something tells me that you've invested little other than rhetoric, although I'd love to be proven wrong in that.
Slimy diversionary tactics noted. Losing argument, change the subject!
As I stew about this and have put together the pieces over the last few years I am writing this out as a lash to bring all of this out in the open and start a reform of America government so there can never be these things done in the name of US citizens again.

The US aided and abbeted theTaliban's rise in a cynical mannner to harass the Soviets, never mind what it did to the good citizens of Afghanistan. The support for Saddam over the years allowed him to kill all those Kurdish villages with poison gas. We did him a lot better, insteasd of 20,000 Kurds we killed 500,000 children. The last great genocide of the 20th century.

I could do little for these people, but I will try to make sure the US does not make these same evil mistakes if I can help it.

Now, what have YOU done for these peoples? What are you going to do about the US penchant for support of evil genocidal bastards and policies?
You cans tart by admitting the US has indeed followed such policies and that it was wrong to do so, even more wrong to continue.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverwind View Post
You may have 'morals', but you have yet to address any of the many difficult issues for your own beliefs that I've paraded before you.
No, I have dealt with them all. All you have done is show you {{Edited}} won't shut up about things you don't get. You are {{edited}} living proof that religion is the problem. I could not invent somebody as a strawman believer to do as much damage to religion as you do for me. I thank you.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverwind View Post
You and your 'morals' are no better (and no worse) than those of the Christians you condemn, and you are very much cousins of the very fundamentalists you condemn...they, too, blindly condemn those whom they don't really understand (and don't take the time to understand) and rarely think about the love of fellow-man that they so often meaninglessly blab on and on about. Are you sure you're not Johnny Skeptic reincarnate? You both harp on Christians, but when the focus turns to your own views, you both throw up defense shields and bow out of the discussion only to return later with more hatred for Christians. Bah...bigots...
I don't understand why killing 500,000 children is good and acceptable I guess. Maybe you can explain it me. I can't understand why supporting Rios Montt, Pinochet, Saddam Hussein, Pol Pot and D'Aubisson was acceptable to right wing Christians. Do explain it to me. I do not understand why sitting on our butts as our Indonesian allies killed 1/3 of the population of East Timur was acceptable. Explain it to me.

I am not talking about love of fellow man. I am talking about not supporting mass murder and genocide. Because it is evil and morally bad.
You will not accept your own Bible's commands from god to not do such things or the atheist claims morality is based on empathy.

Thus as far as I see, you have no basis at all for morality which maybe explains why you are not bothered by 35 years of the US following such policies while good Christians either support these policies or are mainly apathetic and don't even bother to show up at the polls to oppose their evil right wing Christian bretheren.

Christianity is again, a huge moral failure in America.

IIDB rules forbid me to post what I would really like to discuss about you here. But keep posting like this. You do yourself more damage than I can. A perfect bad example.



CC
Cheerful Charlie is offline  
Old 06-25-2007, 01:31 PM   #100
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Allen, Tx
Posts: 604
Default

Wait, Charlie... I have torn your arguments into piecies of pieces and you have yet to respond in depth to any of my arguments, as I have already stated.

You have as much as admitted that you have done nothing but spew evil rhetoric to help the people of Afghanistan and Iraq (and then called it a diversionary tactic and a changing of the subject that I ask what you have really done...balony! I'm seeing if you practice what you preach!). Why is this? This is because you are completely indifferent to their suffering. If you truly cared (and didn't just hate people of religion) then you would have actually done something to help relieve those people. Truth be known, you only need to look in the mirror to see the very type of bigotry you unreasonably rail against.

I have never said that I condoned any killing of any Iraqi children. That is a bogus claim you have dishonestly and erroneously foisted upon me and all Christians. In fact, it bothers me more than it does you because I have found ways to help the people of Afghanistan and Iraq while you admit by your silence that you have done nothing for them. It is your hate of religion that you are really interested in, not the dying children of Iraq. Shame on you for such a sham.

You don't like me. I don't know you personally so I can't make such a judgement, but I certainly don't like the bigoted things you spew at religion.
Riverwind is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:08 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.