FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-14-2007, 10:37 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,808
Default

Quote:
The papyrus industry was localised in Egypt, and was affected by the change in climate in late antiquity. Availability must also have declined after the collapse of the western empire, and in the east after the Arab conquest.

Absolutely. Plus, papyrus was not particularly well-suited to the more humid conditions in Europe. Books were expensive to copy out and a buyer would want them to last.
Minimalist is offline  
Old 11-14-2007, 11:09 AM   #12
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 10,955
Default

Thanks guys. I appreciate the information.
Gamera is offline  
Old 11-14-2007, 12:26 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,884
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by judge View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newton's Cat View Post
I'm convinced that the Gospel of Mark, as we have it today, is a reassembly of a damaged codex (book form rather than roll) in which some of the pages were cut into pieces. .
Was the damaged copy the only copy in existence then?
If not what became of all the other non-damaged copies?
Large numbers of Christian manuscripts werre destroyed during the Diocletian persecutions.


CC
Cheerful Charlie is offline  
Old 11-14-2007, 05:50 PM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheerful Charlie View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by judge View Post

Was the damaged copy the only copy in existence then?
If not what became of all the other non-damaged copies?
Large numbers of Christian manuscripts werre destroyed during the Diocletian persecutions.


Note that this is the claim of Eusebius, and his continuators.
Constantine is depicted as "the liberator" of Rome.
However Diocletion never once mentions "christians",
independent of the Eusebian claims.

Ancient historical citations and evidence support the
notion that Diocletion destroyed the manuscripts and
the followers of the Manichaean religion by fire, but
there exists no independent evidence that Diocletion
so persecuted the "christians".

Perhaps Eusebius somehow confused the Manichaeans
and "the Christians"? We know this was still happening
centuries after Eusebius (eg: Nestorius et al)


Best wishes,



Pete Brown
mountainman is offline  
Old 11-14-2007, 07:15 PM   #15
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamera View Post
In any case, as part of the argument, the author claims that papyrus was expensive. I had heard that the papyrus industry was pretty well developed in the 1st century Roman Empire, and unit costs were pretty low.

The provinces were taxed in many ways.

Quote:
Does anybody know whether papyrus was an expensive commodity at that time or not?
M.I. Finley's The Ancient Economy does not mention
anything about this, and I cannot find any ancient sources
on this subject (this does not mean they dont exist).

Perhaps, if this knowledge is presently not known,
it will become known in the future. For example, it
might be recorded in one of the scrolls of the Pompei
Herculaeum, being examined by new technology.

Best wishes,



Pete Brown
mountainman is offline  
Old 11-14-2007, 09:18 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse View Post
There is some evidence that the original copy of Mark may have been written into a primitive codex.

It is a fact that the Christians adopted the codex form far earlier than anyone else. An analysis of fragments from Oxyrhynchus showed that early use was almost exclusively Christian. It has been theorised from this that this suggests a religious motive, and if one or more of the gospels had originally been written in such a form, this would account for it.

In support of this is adduced the likely loss of the original ending of Mark at some very early date. The ending of a roll is well-protected inside the roll, whereas the end of a codex is on the outside and indeed is routinely lost in ancient and medieval mss.
This article does a fairly good job of making a case for 16:8 as the original ending, and that Mark probably did not write a different ending which has been lost to time.
hatsoff is offline  
Old 11-15-2007, 12:48 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Minimalist View Post
papyrus was not particularly well-suited to the more humid conditions in Europe. Books were expensive to copy out and a buyer would want them to last.
This would certainly be true in the Dark Ages and Middle Ages. The advent of printing -- editions of a couple of hundred copies -- caused prices to fall to 20% of what they had been (Reynolds and Wilson, "Scribes and scholars").

Were books expensive to copy out in antiquity, I wonder? The copyists are slaves, remember, which everyone owned in profusion. Anyone could make a book. The existence of quantities of cheap copies is attested by the finds at Oxyrhynchus.

Papyrus would be fine for a century perhaps, but would then become brittle. The loss of individual pages of codices and thus lacunae in the text of a particular size is sometimes attributed to the text having passed through a stage when it was in a papyrus codex.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 11-15-2007, 03:25 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington, DC (formerly Denmark)
Posts: 3,789
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buck Laser View Post
Papyrus paper, like parchment, was frequently reused. The original writing was scratched off and the new material added. There's even a word for a re-used papyrus. If memory serves, the word is "palympsist." I always found the word amusing because it reminds me of the Scarlet Pimpernel.
Nitpick: The word is 'palimpsest' from the Greek meaning 'scrape again.' Although it was mainly a technique used for parchment, it was occasionally used on papyrus.
Julian is offline  
Old 11-15-2007, 05:26 AM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buck Laser View Post
Papyrus paper, like parchment, was frequently reused. The original writing was scratched off and the new material added. There's even a word for a re-used papyrus. If memory serves, the word is "palympsist." I always found the word amusing because it reminds me of the Scarlet Pimpernel.
Nitpick: The word is 'palimpsest' from the Greek meaning 'scrape again.' Although it was mainly a technique used for parchment, it was occasionally used on papyrus.
A book can indeed be palimpsested more than once. Some texts are found at the bottom of two other texts.

One of the great discoveries of the 19th century was that large numbers of the books from the Dark Ages Irish abbey of Bobbio in Northern Italy were palimpsests, where parchment from ancient codices had been reused. The books are mostly in the Ambrosian library in Milan. The prefect of the library, Cardinal Angelo Mai, was able to recover a considerable number of classical texts, including the Letters of Fronto and the remains of Cicero's Republic using chemicals which brought up the underlying writing. He then went to the Vatican library and did the same there.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 11-15-2007, 06:33 AM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: .
Posts: 1,014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian View Post

Nitpick: The word is 'palimpsest' from the Greek meaning 'scrape again.' Although it was mainly a technique used for parchment, it was occasionally used on papyrus.
A book can indeed be palimpsested more than once. Some texts are found at the bottom of two other texts.

One of the great discoveries of the 19th century was that large numbers of the books from the Dark Ages Irish abbey of Bobbio in Northern Italy were palimpsests, where parchment from ancient codices had been reused. The books are mostly in the Ambrosian library in Milan. The prefect of the library, Cardinal Angelo Mai, was able to recover a considerable number of classical texts, including the Letters of Fronto and the remains of Cicero's Republic using chemicals which brought up the underlying writing. He then went to the Vatican library and did the same there.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
In 1981 I had the privilege of seeing and holding (well they were sealed in clear plastic bags but that was a s close as most people can get to them ) some recently discovered palimpsests and saw all the photographs taken at each stage of the "restoration",while they were not fantastically significant being mainly works of relatively minor Latin poets I do remember the excitement of actually being able to examine them myself if only superficially .
I was going to suggest that Scribes and Scholars may be a good source of information and dig my copy out but I see that Roger Pearse has already referred to it, so I assume it may not have any relevant information regarding prices of papyrus.
Lucretius is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:04 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.