FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-26-2012, 04:01 AM   #181
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
If Christianity is properly named, then humanism must be absent from it.
I detect in your attitude a presumption of personal infallibility that is indistinguishable from the pope's.
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 04:11 AM   #182
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Shaver View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
If Christianity is properly named, then humanism must be absent from it.
I detect in your attitude a presumption of personal infallibility that is indistinguishable from the pope's.
You do? Or is it that you mistake an inevitable, objective, logical infallibility for mine?

Why 'the' pope? Is there some objective reality referred to here?
sotto voce is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 04:12 AM   #183
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Shaver View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
If Christianity is properly named, then humanism must be absent from it.
I detect in your attitude a presumption of personal infallibility that is indistinguishable from the pope's.
More likely, Calvin.

DCH
DCHindley is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 04:15 AM   #184
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCHindley View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Shaver View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
If Christianity is properly named, then humanism must be absent from it.
I detect in your attitude a presumption of personal infallibility that is indistinguishable from the pope's.
More likely, Calvin.

DCH
Ooooh, he knows how to wound.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 05:30 AM   #185
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
Default

A crystal ball can be very useful
Iskander is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 05:51 AM   #186
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iskander View Post
A crystal ball can be very useful
So the supernatural exists, after all.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 05:57 AM   #187
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iskander View Post
A crystal ball can be very useful
So the supernatural exists, after all.
What!!! A spherical piece of glass confirms the supernatural!!!! Some people believe anything.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 09:35 AM   #188
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

David Hindley, this is very interesting indeed, that the author of Acts is speaking in an idiom familiar to readers, though I wonder WHICH readers would know maxims from Greek sources hundreds of years old. Were these the elite or the common people or both?

What is also of interest is IF there was a strain of monotheism among Greeks, to what extent were the Christian authors creating a real comfort zone for those elements of Greek society that were more linked to this old Greek monotheism than to the pagan beliefs??

Regarding my original point, IF the author of the epistles had known Acts, then presumably he *should* have known about the GLuke, but did not integrate any of this into the epistles. I am still looking over the correlations Toto referred me to, but I still tend to think that Acts and the epistle writers had access to some common sources that were similar but not identical.


Then there is another very interesting issue: that there was a clear strain of MONOTHEISM in Greek culture which seems to have existed alongside the paganism.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCHindley View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
And I am highly interested to know why you think the authors of the epistles did not integrate elements from Acts into the epistles if not that they originated from two different sources.
Dave,

One area that has long fascinated me was the fact that Acts 17:23, 28, 1 Cor 15:33, and Titus 1:12, all seem to quote or paraphrase ancient Greek Philosopher/Poets.

Here is the lowdown:

Acts 17:23ff:
23 For as I passed along, and observed the objects of your worship, I found also an altar with this inscription, 'To an unknown god.' (1a & b) What therefore you worship as unknown, this I proclaim to you.

Acts 17:27-28:
27 Yet he [the unknown god] is not far from each one of us, 28 for 'In him we live and move and have our being'; (2b) as even some of your own poets have said, 'For we are indeed his offspring.'" (3)

1 Cor. 15:33:
"Bad company ruins good morals." (4)

Titus 1:12:
"Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, lazy gluttons," (2a)

Sources (and I'll tell you right now that this list is far more complete than anything else I have found on the net):

(1a) Diogenes Laertius, (fl. ca. 3rd century CE) Life of the Eminent Philosophers, Book 1, Epimenides, sections 109-115:
110. So he [Epimenides - dch] became famous throughout Greece, and was believed to be a special favourite of heaven. Hence, when the Athenians were attacked by pestilence, and the Pythian priestess bade them purify the city, they sent a ship commanded by Nicias, son of Niceratus, to Crete to ask the help of Epimenides. And he came in the 46th Olympiad, [595-592 BCE] purified their city, and stopped the pestilence in the following way. He took sheep, some black and others white, and brought them to the Areopagus; and there he let them go whither they pleased, instructing those who followed them to mark the spot where each sheep lay down and offer a sacrifice to the local divinity. And thus, it is said, the plague was stayed. Hence even to this day altars may be found in different parts of Attica with no name inscribed upon them, which are memorials of this atonement.
[tr. Robert Drew Hicks, Loeb, 1925, Vol 1 of 2].

1b) Theodore of Mopsuestia (350-428 CE) also illuminates the mention of an Unnamed God in Acts 17:23. The following quote of Theodore is found in the Commentary on Acts of Isho'dad of Merv:
"About this altar, on which was written, To the hidden God, Mar Ephraim and others say, that want of rain and earthquakes sometimes happened at Athens; and when they took counsel to make prayers collectively every day, they changed the altars of all their gods; and when altars were at an end and there were no helps, they overturned them and threw them down; and again they congregated and took counsel, saying, If there are no others, who is this one who does not cease to trouble us? and they carved and set up altars to the hidden God, whoever He was; and when the mercies of Grace revealed about the anguish of their minds, He sent them help. But the Interpreter [not sure who is meant - dch] says that the Athenians were once upon a time at war with their enemies, and the Athenians retreated from them in defeat; then a certain Demon appeared and said unto them, I have never been honoured by you as I ought; and because I am angry with you, therefore you have had a defeat from your enemies. Then the Athenians were afraid, and raised to him [i.e., Pan - dch] the well-known altar, and because they dreaded lest this very thing should happen to them, having secretly neglected [one] who was unknown to them, they erected for themselves one altar more, and wrote upon it, Of the Unknown and Hidden God; and when they wished to say this, that though there is a God in whom we do not believe, we raise this altar to His honour, that He may be reconciled to us, although He is not honoured as known; therefore Paul did well to take a reason from this, and said before them, This hidden God to whom ye have raised an altar without knowing Him, I have come to declare unto you. There is no God whom ye know not, except the true God, who hath appointed the times by His command, and hath put bounds," etc. (See Mrs. [Margaret Dunlop] Gibson's edition of Isho'dad, in Horae Semiticae, x., [1913,] p. 28.)
[quote was from The Beginnings of Christianity, Part I - The Acts Of The Apostles - Vol. V., edited by F. J. Foakes-Jackson and Kirsopp Lake, 1933, pg. 244.]

(2a&b) Epiminedes (ca. 500-600 BCE), Greek poet, fragment from his Cretica:
They fashioned a tomb for thee, O high and holy one,
a) the Cretans, always liars, evil beasts, idle bellies!
But thou art not dead; thou livest and abidest forever;
b) for in thee we live and move and have our being.
[Cited by the 9th century CE Syriac writer Isho'dad of Merv, Commentary on Titus, ed. M. D. Gibson, Horae Semiticae, X, Cambridge, 1913, p. 40; see also J. Rendel Harris' initial publication of his identification and hypothetical Greek translation of this citation in the Expositor, Oct. 1906, 305–17; Apr. 1907, 332–37; and Apr. 1912, 348–353). Isho'dad attributes the quote to Theodore of Mopsuestia (see above), who attributes it to the Critica of Epimenides, but suggests Theodore's quote might originate from another poem of Epimenides, PERI MINW KAI hRADAMANQOUS "On Mino and Rhadamanthys". Both Poems are mentioned by name by Diogenes Laertius, Lives 1.112]

(2a) Callimachus (310/305–240 BC), has something similar in his Hymn to Zeus, section 8, but it appears to lack the part about laziness and gluttony, and may reflect a partial borrowing from Epiminedes.
(2a) Clement of Alexandria, Miscellanies 1.14, attributes the lines about Cretans that we find in Titus 1.12, including the part about laziness and gluttony, to Epimenides, but calls his source De oraculis (QEOGONIA).
(2a) Jerome, Commentary on the Epistle to Titus, attributes Titus 1:12 to Epimenides, but calls the work PERI CRHSMWN. [Migne, P.L. XXVI, 572ff]
(2a) Tatian, Address to the Greeks 27; Origen, Against Celsus 3.43; and Athenagoras Suppl. 30, all quote it without attribution to a specific author.
[Last 4 citations are from Pastoral Epistles, by I. Howard Marshall, Philip H. Towner, New York : T & T Clark, 1999 http://books.google.com/books?id=IA5...tia%22&f=false ]

(2b) Cleanthes, (331-232 B.C.) who was a disciple of Zeno the Stoic, and considered the universe a living being and said that god was the soul of the universe and the sun its heart, says in his Hymn to Zeus:
Most glorious of the immortals, invoked by many names, ever all-powerful,
Zeus, the First Cause of Nature, who rules all things with Law,
Hail! It is right for mortals to call upon you,
since from you we have our being, we whose lot it is to be God's image,
we alone of all mortal creatures that live and move upon the earth.
[this fragment was preserved by the 5th century CE compiler from Greek authors, Johannes Stobaeus, Eclogues (Extracts). 1.1.12. p. 25, 3. ET found in A. de Rossi "Cleanthes’ Hymn to Zeus." tr. M. A. C. Ellery, Classical Bulletin 53, 1976, 1-2]

(3) Aratus (ca. 310 - 240 BCE), Phaenomena (1-5):
From Zeus let us begin; him do we mortals never leave unnamed;
full of Zeus are all the streets and all the market-places of men;
full is the sea and the havens thereof;
always we all have need of Zeus.
For we are also his offspring;
[Callimachus, Hymns and Epigrams. Lycophron. Aratus. Translated by Mair, A. W. & G. R. Loeb Classical Library Volume 129. London: William Heinemann, 1921. http://www.theoi.com/Text/AratusPhaenomena.html]

(4) Menander (342-291 B.C.), the comic dramatist, Thais:
(Lovely Thais, sit beside me ;
I detect, but still abide thee)

"Loose-bridled"? Pest! Methinks, though I
have suffered this, that none the less I'd now be
glad to have her.

Sing to me, goddess, sing of such an one as she:
audacious, beautiful, and plausible withal; she does
you wrongs; she locks her door; keeps asking you
for gifts; she loveth none, but ever makes pretence.

Communion with the bad corrupts good character.
[Francis G. Allinson, Menander, the principal fragments, with an English translation, New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons (Loeb) 1921, pg 357; based on Theodorus Kock, Comicorum Atticorum fragmenta, vol. 3, 1888, fragment 218, pg 62; from Euripides fragment 1013 in Johann August Nauck's Euripides, Tragedies and Fragments, 1854, 3rd ed., 1871.]

Enjoy!

DCH
Duvduv is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 10:35 AM   #189
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
...Regarding my original point, IF the author of the epistles had known Acts, then presumably he *should* have known about the GLuke, but did not integrate any of this into the epistles. I am still looking over the correlations Toto referred me to, but I still tend to think that Acts and the epistle writers had access to some common sources that were similar but not identical....
Well, the very link that Toto provided has DESTROYED any claim that the author of Acts knew of the Pauline letters.

The Pauline letters are the ONLY Significant things that he did NOT write about.

It is MOST remarkably that the author of Acts wrote about LETTERS and EPISTLES written by the Church of JERUSALEM.

And even more DEVASTATING the author of Acts mentioned the FULL CONTENTS of a typical Letter.

The Letters by the Church of Jerusalem were EXTREMELY short as can be seen in Acts 15 and consisted of about 150 words and occupy only 6 verses of Acts 15. 23-29.

The author of Acts was NOT a witness of the Pauline writings and knew NOTHING at all of them.

The Pauline writings are the MOST SIGNIFICANT doctrinal writings in the Canon and they are NOT mentioned anywhere in Acts of the Apostles.

Acts of the Apostles was written BEFORE the Pauline writings since the author of Acts only wrote of extremely short Letters from the Church of Jerusalem. Acts 15.23-29
aa5874 is offline  
Old 01-26-2012, 11:25 AM   #190
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

Your points are well taken, aa5874 . This doesn't PRECLUDE the possibility of longer letters, although we do know that such long letters written to congregations by "Paul" are not mentioned in Acts.

Now with regard to your last sentence, if you believe that Acts was written before the epistles, WHY do you
think the author(s) of the epistles did not include some important elements from Acts? Do you think the epistle writers never saw Acts, and no one ever thought to interpolate Galatians or some other epistle with information from Acts? Do you believe they each stem from a different tradition and location?
Duvduv is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:16 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.