FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-16-2005, 12:51 AM   #41
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wherever I am.
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baalthazaq
At present I find myself with very little to rely on other than my faith and the prospect of losing it (either through questioning it, or by not being able to question it) is making me worse.

It's not all I have left. It hasn't gotten as bad as that yet, but I'm sure you can see the reasoning behind the OP.
I don't know you but I feel for you. The thing that causes the most pain is the most recurrent thought, in my experience. While I too would advise the same as the others (get your mind off the situation etc. etc.), I know how hard that would be.

I don't think your current problem is a crisis of faith - I think it is probably just manifesting as one. You said yourself that you've lost friends, family, stability. The only thing you have left is a shred of comfort that is being provided by religion and you are now denying yourself that comfort. Not to sound Oprah-esque about it but it does sound like you're beating yourself up as hard as you possibly can from every angle imaginable.

You mentioned being in therapy. This is something you should bring up in your next session. While your crisis of faith does need addressing eventually, I think your desire to deny yourself comfort requires addressing now.

Best of luck.
A Still Small Voice is offline  
Old 11-16-2005, 09:00 AM   #42
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: WHERE GOD IS NOT!!!!!
Posts: 4,338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heathen Dawn
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadBadBad
It's a matter of anchoring my life to reality as compared to fantasy.
Reality? Who has the reality? We have nothing but perception. I agree there is an objective reality out there, but none of us has it. We all get it filtered through various filters—our senses, instrumentation, our biases, the evidence we choose to evaluate. A dog has a whole world of smell of which we have no inkling; how much more, then, the entire reality?

You use the scientific method to uncover the reality; you do well, but not the best—uno itinere non potest perveniri ad tam grande secretum, said Symmachus, it is not possible to arrive at such a great secret by only one road. The scientific method is one among many filters. It makes us more enlightened than without its use, but to think it can tell us the whole truth about reality is the same mistake fundamentalist Christians make with their Bible.

Sometimes the answer is right under our gnosis.
If there's one thing in life we must cling to and never question, why shouldn't that be the simple reality that we open our eyes and see? Why should it be fantasy and imagination and that which makes us happy, that which we want to be true? I open my eyes. I'm alive. Then I see death. I don't see fanciful life after death. I just see a rotting carcass. That's what I mean. If we must cling to something in life, and never question it, why shouldn't it be the simple reality we see when we open our eyes?
BadBadBad is offline  
Old 11-16-2005, 09:20 AM   #43
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4,656
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BadBadBad
If there's one thing in life we must cling to and never question, why shouldn't that be the simple reality that we open our eyes and see? Why should it be fantasy and imagination and that which makes us happy, that which we want to be true? I open my eyes. I'm alive. Then I see death. I don't see fanciful life after death. I just see a rotting carcass. That's what I mean. If we must cling to something in life, and never question it, why shouldn't it be the simple reality we see when we open our eyes?
If there’s one thing that’s preached on this board, it is never to take things on people’s mere say-so. This I do: people say “this is fantasy” and “that is imagination”, but I know better than to digest those words blindly. I declare something to be fantasy only when the world doesn’t work that way—for example, an omni-max God in a world of birth defects. In contrast, there is nothing about life after death that contradicts what we know about the world.

And you’ve chosen to ignore my post entirely. You talk about “the simple reality we see when we open our eyes”, but the very fact that we have to use our eyes to see it means that it’s a perception, not the actual, objective reality. The cardinal faith of naturalism is that the senses and instruments we use are the key to the whole of reality. You’re entitled to that faith, but it is a faith. Sagan’s “the cosmos is all there is, was or ever will be” is a statement of faith, not a scientific discovery. And since naturalism too involves the use of faith, the trusting leap into the dark abyss, I see no superiority in it, and I feel no obligation to think according to it, and I feel fully justified in choosing a different way. I am not moved by your attempts to shame theists into disbelieving by portraying this as a war between inferior faith and superior reason. I don’t buy that. Guru Chopra and Guru Dawkins are equal in my mind as people I don’t take as authorities.
Heathen Dawn is offline  
Old 11-16-2005, 09:48 AM   #44
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4,656
Default

I’ve got a sore throat and I have to go.

Baal, I just have this to say: as long as you’re good towards others, it doesn’t matter what you believe. You’ll find out your beliefs some day, I promise you that.
Heathen Dawn is offline  
Old 11-16-2005, 12:10 PM   #45
Beloved Deceased
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: central Florida
Posts: 3,546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heathen Dawn
... In contrast, there is nothing about life after death that contradicts what we know about the world.

And you’ve chosen to ignore my post entirely. You talk about “the simple reality we see when we open our eyes�?, but the very fact that we have to use our eyes to see it means that it’s a perception, not the actual, objective reality. The cardinal faith of naturalism is that the senses and instruments we use are the key to the whole of reality. You’re entitled to that faith, but it is a faith. Sagan’s “the cosmos is all there is, was or ever will be�? is a statement of faith, not a scientific discovery. And since naturalism too involves the use of faith, the trusting leap into the dark abyss, I see no superiority in it, and I feel no obligation to think according to it, and I feel fully justified in choosing a different way. I am not moved by your attempts to shame theists into disbelieving by portraying this as a war between inferior faith and superior reason. I don’t buy that. Guru Chopra and Guru Dawkins are equal in my mind as people I don’t take as authorities.
Since you seem to question what is/isn't reality, then perhaps your sore throat is not real but merely a figment of your imagination...an imagination based on your faith rather than any reason. I fear I lack sufficient confidence in faith healing to recommend an appropriate course of action for you to rid your sensory body of this sore throat...or to support your allegation that "there is nothing about life after death that contradicts what we know about the world."
Buffman is offline  
Old 11-16-2005, 06:38 PM   #46
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 6,471
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PoodleLovinPessimist
...I don't think philosophy is much value when you're depressed and unhappy.
Amen.

d
diana is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:48 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.