Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-20-2004, 01:38 PM | #31 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nowra, N.S.W, Australia
Posts: 19
|
Quote:
Hi Nightshade, Thanks. It was meant for here. That's the trouble with posting after midnight. :banghead: Apologies for the inconvenience. Yours sincerely, Sean McHugh |
|
04-24-2004, 03:17 AM | #32 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Can You Hear Me Now
Posts: 110
|
Vinnie's latest post is quite nice -- short, to the point -- and I was especially happy to see him throw down the gauntlet (to borrow from Roy and HG) to RobertLW on demonstrating inerrancy. Sadly I can only see a few possible outcomes of this.
1. RobertLW will retreat to the position that he only has to defend inerrancy, not demonstrate it. 2. He will return to his attempts to shift the burdon of proof. 3. He will resort to a species of circular argument. 4. He will (attempt to) demonstrate inerrancy. (!) Obviously 1 and 2 (with a sprinkling of 3) are the most likely. At this point I consider 4 unlikely, but RobertLW may as well stop dancing in quicksand and go down fighting. The way I see it, he's going to be sucked down anyway, so he may as well give it one last shot. He might even manage to save this debate from mediocrity (though Vinnie has done a nice job, considering). Fallon |
04-30-2004, 09:29 PM | #33 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Bloomington, MN
Posts: 2,209
|
RobertLW has posted his latest statement, and in doing so he has announced his intention to withdraw from the debate. Thus, Vinnie will be allowed to post a concluding statement, after which the debate thread will be closed.
Dave |
05-03-2004, 07:33 AM | #34 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
|
Looks like Fallon forgot a fifth possibility
I think most here will agree that this is the best outcome the debate could have. An important lesson which can be drawn from it is that one should perhaps not debate someone whose style of argumention/arguments one is not familar with. A little bit more discussion for the start of the debate would have been helpful to get a much more interesting debate. But perhaps this topic simply is not worth debating |
05-03-2004, 10:04 AM | #35 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
|
Since I just hit "submit" on my latest response I guess I can post in here now. As long as its allowed through I guess the debate is over. My final installment was a little high on the "rhetorical jousting" at times but granted nothing of substance to respond to, what else could I do?
I don't really see a need to add anything to this thread that hasn't been addressed by someone else already. If I missed something let me know. If someone new chimes in I'll be lurking. I think this experience might discourage me from engaging in future formal debates with unknown people or people in general. This was pitiful. Vinnie |
05-03-2004, 10:18 AM | #36 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
|
Quote:
I only listed three myself at the end of the debate: Quote:
This sums it up for me: ""Boohoo, I can't refute it. Boohoo. You cheated. Sniffle. Wine. Sniffle." Vinnie |
||
05-03-2004, 10:19 AM | #37 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
|
Quote:
Nice Job, Vinnie! You never had any tough points to answer, but presented your points quite coherent. At least for most people... |
|
05-03-2004, 10:23 AM | #38 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
|
Quote:
At least I got my "surface anomaly" argument drafted up in a more lengthy and thorough manner. I had a similar argument online with this same issue but this one updates it extensively. I also have some material up on Judas Death and the food laws and the lack of a canonical dimension which could all easily be adapted into four separate articles for my site. So all is not lost and I have a reformulation of the tenth plague which cuts past "you don't posess an objective standard." Vinnie |
|
05-03-2004, 10:53 AM | #39 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Alaska!
Posts: 14,058
|
Quote:
crc |
|
05-03-2004, 12:17 PM | #40 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
|
Apparently my concluding statement was too high on the polemic and rhetorical jousting to be posted :notworthy
I kind of thought it might be but I will not rewrite it. Ths debate was too much of a comic nightmare to waste any further time on cumbersome pleasantries. I'll put my original submitted reply on the net tonight after work. If anyone wants to read my concluding piece they can do it then Vinnie P.S. I feel your pain wiploc |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|