Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-03-2005, 10:05 AM | #81 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wisconsin USA
Posts: 148
|
Quote:
If Ron Wyatt was a true fraud, he would have planted a wheel that looks IDENTICAL to the inscriptions found in Cairo. Not so...the fact that it has some unique features only proves that this is a wheel to be added to the list...it is very similar to Hoffmier's depictions. It's all authentic guys...nothing fraud here. Start shutting up and facing it. You will never find a shred of evidence that proves Ron Wyatt a fraud once and for all. |
|
07-03-2005, 11:12 AM | #82 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,043
|
I have no idea if Ron Wyatt is a fraud. I do know that whatever he has found - assuming he has found anything at all - is not Noah's ark for the simple reason that there was no Noah and there was no Ark. It was a moral tale invented for our own purposes - never in a million years did we imagine a bunch of Gullible Goy woudl take the fables literally 2500 years down the line.
|
07-03-2005, 11:16 AM | #83 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,043
|
Quote:
|
|
07-03-2005, 12:03 PM | #84 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,666
|
Quote:
BTW, were any of these godproof chariots found? |
|
07-03-2005, 02:40 PM | #85 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Middlesbrough, England
Posts: 3,909
|
Quote:
Boro Nut |
|
07-03-2005, 03:21 PM | #86 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Middlesbrough, England
Posts: 3,909
|
Quote:
I know absolutely nothing about Ron Wyatt, so here's my predictions which I make with 100% confidence. Feel happy to tell me where I'm wrong. I bet his lifestyle was funded almost entirely from donations from gullible idiots in the face of zero tangible evidence of his successes other then his say-so. Here's another one. Look up the FBI profile of con men who dupe the life savings out of gullible incompetents and it will match Wyatt's modus operandi exactly. Here's another one. Reread any pronouncements by Wyatt and see how many of his "shortly" - "soon" - or - "by next year" promises relating to amazing discoveries came true. There wont be any. Here's another one. He made dozens of such pronouncements over a number of years. Here's another one. Any supposed tangible artefacts are either lost in transit, impounded by authorities, or in safekeeping awaiting the right moment. Here's another one. Impartial third parties invoked in support of any claims will have a substantially different version of events, (including but not limited to "Who's Ron Wyatt?"). Here's another one. Read your fictional book and find out where the fictional exodus of the fictional people took place. It won't be anywhere near the fictional chariot wheel. Boro Nut |
|
07-03-2005, 03:57 PM | #87 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wisconsin USA
Posts: 148
|
Quote:
And I don't care what hoo-cha-cha anyone has to say about his claims about the blood on the Mercy Seat. The important thing is, "is the Ark down there"? If it is, then don't later go sticking your tail between your legs. The only important things are these: Was Ron Wyatt right that the Ark is down through Zedekiah's Cave? Did he find Noah's Ark? Did he find the correct crossing site? Did he locate the true Mount Sinai? Was he right that the ancient cities of the plain surrounded the Dead Sea, and that the ashen remains literred with Sulpher are the remains of Sodom and Gomorrah (Bible says the cities turned to "Pure Ash!"). Traditional scientists naturally will not latch on to this stuff, and that is expected. But that's their problem. They're not going to accept it even if an angel came down from heaven and told them so. They're minds are already set. They don't have to believe any of it if they don't want. But true Bible believers KNOW what it is. Quote:
Ron Wyatt theorized that the Gulf of Aqaba was the CORRECT crossing site BEFORE he even went diving in it and discovered all those chariot parts and human and horse remains. Numerous of other witnesses have seen these remains. It's a no-brainer. I have met people who have seen them. Josephus says that a ridge of mountains obstructed the Israelite's flight on either ends of the beach. Well, Nuweiba Beach is the ONLY beach in these regions that even remotely resembles these descriptions. And here's the punchline: Galations 4:25 says: "For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children." Therefore, the body of water that the Israelites crossed HAD to be the Gulf of Aqaba. It is the most logical. It is the body of water that separates ancient Egypt (Sinai Peninsula) from Saudi Arabia. Additionally, several verses make it very clear that the Israelites were OUT of Egypt BEFORE they crossed the Red Sea (Egypt meaning "Egypt proper", not territorial control). If you place the Israelites on the west side of Suez or any of its northern lakes, you are STILL IN EGYPT! All ancient records testify that border of Egypt Proper lie where the canal is today. There are volume fulls of info that I could provide, but unfortunately I have limited time. I strongly suggest you do your own research, and NOT just read all the garbage that's thrown at you on the web. Read books that have valuable data with excellent sources... A couple books I recommend reading: "The Exodus Case" by Dr. Lennart Moller www.exoduscase.com (also watch the video clips with the new series coming out) "The Boat-Shaped Object on Doomsday Mountain" by Mary Nell Wyatt (this book fills you in on the never-before released material confirming the radar scans and the authentic labratory tests confirming man-made matererials). www.wyattmuseum.com The book is right there on the front page. It is interesting to note that we get metal-hot spot readings on approximately some 5400 regular intervals throughout the "boat-shape", but no metal readings anywhere outside of the structure. Ancient Babylonian Records and Assyrian Records testify to the Ark of Noah, and that it was "impaled on a rock". We find this boat-formation in the exact location where the ancient clues point us to. We also find it "impaled on a rock", PLUS, the metal lines that were read by the metal detectors are actually "bent" and "irregular"--exactly as would be expected by the "impaling" force against the rock as the boat slid down the mountain from the alluvial mud flow. |
||
07-03-2005, 05:01 PM | #88 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,043
|
Quote:
|
|
07-03-2005, 05:08 PM | #89 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,043
|
Quote:
|
|
07-03-2005, 05:35 PM | #90 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 10,532
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|