FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-26-2009, 05:29 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Indianaplolis
Posts: 4,998
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by show_no_mercy View Post
In a related and much more recent experiment, after the Challenger expolsion, Neisser and Harsch conducted interviews with 44 students and asked them to fill out a questionaire to give their recollections of that traumatic event.

About two years later, Neisser and Harsch had the same 44 students repeat the questionaire. They found that recollections a mere two years after a traumatic event were woefully inaccurate. Some students even thought that their current memory was the more accurate one than the one they wrote closer to the event... even suggesting that an imposter wrote the earlier account!

http://pages.slc.edu/~ebj/iminds04/L...er-harsch.html (Here's the study that that website cited: Neisser, U. & Harsch, N. (1992). Phantom flashbulbs: False recollections of hearing the news about Challenger. In E. Winograd & U. Neisser (Eds.), Affect and accuracy in recall: Studies of "flashbulb memories" (pp. 9-31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

How easy would it be for the much more superstitious culture of 1st century Palestine to have false memories about the deeds and life of Jesus?
Then lets give up on all history as anything reliable. What can we know for sure about any historical event?
Jedi Mind Trick is offline  
Old 11-26-2009, 06:27 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jedi Mind Trick View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by show_no_mercy View Post
In a related and much more recent experiment, after the Challenger expolsion, Neisser and Harsch conducted interviews with 44 students and asked them to fill out a questionaire to give their recollections of that traumatic event.

About two years later, Neisser and Harsch had the same 44 students repeat the questionaire. They found that recollections a mere two years after a traumatic event were woefully inaccurate. Some students even thought that their current memory was the more accurate one than the one they wrote closer to the event... even suggesting that an imposter wrote the earlier account!

http://pages.slc.edu/~ebj/iminds04/L...er-harsch.html (Here's the study that that website cited: Neisser, U. & Harsch, N. (1992). Phantom flashbulbs: False recollections of hearing the news about Challenger. In E. Winograd & U. Neisser (Eds.), Affect and accuracy in recall: Studies of "flashbulb memories" (pp. 9-31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

How easy would it be for the much more superstitious culture of 1st century Palestine to have false memories about the deeds and life of Jesus?
Then lets give up on all history as anything reliable. What can we know for sure about any historical event?
How about we just take it on a case by case basis.
dog-on is offline  
Old 11-26-2009, 08:32 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
Default

You will find the native accounts of the incident in Lakota and Cheyenne: Indian Views of the Great Sioux War, 1876-1877, by Jerome A. Greene. You can judge for yourselves if they have greater verisimilitude than that of showman Cody.
No Robots is offline  
Old 11-26-2009, 10:30 AM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Shaver View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by No Robots View Post
You might be surprised at the accuracy of oral transmission in an oral culture.
How does one confirm that accuracy? If you hear a story that is has been orally transmitted, how do you verify its truth?
Oral transmission is normally the first method of transmission. And written records are compiled from the very same oral transmissions.

Accuracy of oral and written information can be verified sometimes by physical evidence.

The veracity of a source is not determined by its format.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 11-26-2009, 10:55 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,014
Default More Tangled Narratives

Hi No Robots,

Thanks for this.

Unfortunately, the two Native American accounts are from 1929. This is 53 years after the event. It is difficult to know how much validity to give to either one. Beaver Heart's report directly contradicts the earliest reports of the soldiers. Yellow Hair's sister, Josie Tangled-Yellow Hair, seems to be trying to undercut Beaver Heart's credibility by saying that she never saw him and he belonged to an outlaw gang. She admits that she was not there at Warbonnet Creek, but only heard shots. One detail that she gives sounds suspicious. The idea that the soldiers left Yellow Hair's body on the spot where he died for a month seems bizarre. One imagines that the soldiers would have buried it or returned it to the tribe.
Perhaps both of these elderly people were simply having some fun and pulling the legs of their interviewers by claiming a relationship to the events 53 years previously. They don't sound any more believable to me than the varied and contradictory soldier reports.

Here is a recent website that shows just a few of the tangled Warbonnet narratives from that period: Smoke Signals

Warmly,

Philosopher Jay

Quote:
Originally Posted by No Robots View Post
You will find the native accounts of the incident in Lakota and Cheyenne: Indian Views of the Great Sioux War, 1876-1877, by Jerome A. Greene. You can judge for yourselves if they have greater verisimilitude than that of showman Cody.
PhilosopherJay is offline  
Old 11-26-2009, 11:08 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
Default

It looks to me that we can arrive at a few agreed-upon facts.
No Robots is offline  
Old 11-26-2009, 11:15 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

It may be worth noting that versions of the story become progressively more problematic over the subsequent decades.

The versions within 50 or so years of the event agree on the broad outlines of what happened.

It is 80 years afterwards that a radically revisionist narrative occurs. (The M. I. McCreight version.)

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 11-26-2009, 11:27 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,014
Default Exaggerations But Nothing Supernatural

Hi aa5874,

I think you make a good point that the numerous supernatural events in the gospels may indicate a deliberate attempt at fiction.

The accounts of the Warbonnet Creek Incident are sometimes wildly exaggerated. For example, in one account, Buffalo Bill had Yellow Hand leading over 2,000 Native Americans, a bit more than the six or seven companions who usually accompany Yellow Hand in the narrative. Still, as far as I know, nobody ever puts forward any supernatural details. We have no reports of Yellow Hand being healed after he dies or Buffalo Bill flying into the sky.

Warmly,

Philosopher Jay


Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by show_no_mercy View Post
....How easy would it be for the much more superstitious culture of 1st century Palestine to have false memories about the deeds and life of Jesus?
Asking people about details of an event and asking them if the event ever occurred is a total different matter.

People can easily forget details about an event but they will hardly forget that the event happened, the very same applies to the Challenger accident.

I can scarcely remember anything that my father said to me at any specific time when I was a child but I can remember that he lived.

A person may forget where they were when JFK was shot, but it is far more difficult to forget that JFK was assassinated.

The NT is very problematic since the authors provide witnesses for events that could not have happened.

According to the NT, the 1st bishop of Rome, Peter, saw Jesus walk on water during a storm, saw Jesus transfigure, was with Jesus after the resurrection and was present when Jesus went through the clouds.

Even if these authors could not remember all the details of any event, the mere idea that they claimed events happened that never did show a deliberate attempt to write fiction.
PhilosopherJay is offline  
Old 11-26-2009, 11:40 AM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,014
Default Yes, a Few Things Are Clear

Hi No Robots,

I think that we can agree on a few facts,

A native American was shot around 5 A.M. on the morning of July 17, 1876. Buffalo Bill did lead out a group of men (7-15) to intercept some Native Americans.

Almost all the details become problematic, including the important ones of 1) Who actually killed him? 2) How was he killed? 3) What was he actually doing there?) 4) Who was he? and 5) Was he scalped afterwards?

Warmly,

Philosopher Jay

Quote:
Originally Posted by No Robots View Post
It looks to me that we can arrive at a few agreed-upon facts.
PhilosopherJay is offline  
Old 11-26-2009, 12:40 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,014
Default Confusion From the Beginning

Hi Andrew,

Actually, I think the contradictions and problems with the narratives start almost immediately. For example The New York Herald on July 24th, one week after the incident, published an account based on a July 23rd dispatch from Charles King that portrayed a duel between Yellow Hand and Buffalo Bill. King later admitted not seeing the actual killing, but getting his information from two other soldiers. He also later said that many things had been added to his dispatch. The Kansas "Ellis County Star" published, on August 3rd, a dispatch from Sargeant John Powers, sent July 22nd, which describes Buffalo Bill rising up "from behind a hill" and without warning shooting the pony of Yellow Hand. It is a very different account from the one in the New York Herald.

Official records list only one Native American killed. Charles King's diary lists two Native Americans killed. John Powers' diary lists three dead. Private James Frew recorded in his diary that seven Native Americans had been killed in the incident.
(Information from "The Lives and Legends of Buffalo Bill" by Don Russell).

By 50 years, the multitudes of conflicting narratives were so great and so few witnesses were still alive that there was little hope of reconciling all of them and coming up with a clear picture of what happened.

Warmly,

Philosopher Jay

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
It may be worth noting that versions of the story become progressively more problematic over the subsequent decades.

The versions within 50 or so years of the event agree on the broad outlines of what happened.

It is 80 years afterwards that a radically revisionist narrative occurs. (The M. I. McCreight version.)

Andrew Criddle
PhilosopherJay is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:30 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.