truthsetsyoufree

click here for full article

"Bush and Kerry are 9th cousins, twice removed. There is a familial tie. This status was upgraded since February 2004, at which time MSNBC claimed they were only known to be 16th cousins. So they may be closer than 9th, but no less. Additionally, they are both related to all sorts of important and royal figures. Both are related to Charlemagne, Walt Disney, MacArthur, and FDR, all Illuminists. They are both related to, tellingly, Benedict Arnold and John Hinckley, Jr. Finally, to go along with those elite sex slavery rumors, the 9th cousins are both 9th cousins with Hugh Hefner, also a royal. Let me see if I have this straight. Charlemagne was crowned the first Germanic Holy Roman Emperor, staged in a bizarre occult ceremony, according to Baigent, Leigh, and Lincoln's 'Holy Blood, Holy Grail.' From here, the line goes out, until some famous, blue-blood Plymouth Rocker gets to America to help spread the English empire. This would be Kerry and Bush's common ancestor, 11 generations ago. Then we have one of the supposed 13 Illuminati bloodlines, Walt Disney, according to Fritz Springmeier. MacArthur's military escapades are still debated, with much of the real information hidden or missing. Oh, I forgot the English traitor, Benedict Arnold. Is it any wonder both Bush and Kerry stand behind England. Finally, family-relation, John Hinckley, Jr., attempted to assassinate Reagan, a man who was against everything Bush, Sr. was for - until after the attempt. Now Bush and Kerry, relations to all those men, and related to each other, are 'locked in a struggle for power.' Come on!

I guess it is good that Bush and Kerry went to the elite secret society/fraternity a few years apart. I guess the atmosphere went from one ideological spectrum to another. Had they been together, they would have been at each others throat…or, maybe they would have plotted how to take over the two parties and stage an election which would allow the war hawk to win, thus keeping both the lineal businesses flowing with capital."

-- LINKS (from mainstream "reliable" sources)
John Kerry is related to Bush, from Microsoft network ancestry page
John Kerry has blue blood from all the royal houses of Europe (even more blue blood than Bush)
Kerry /Bush = SKULL AND BONES members, from the london guardian
George, the bonesman president (just like his father), from CNN
skull and bones article archive (MUST SEE!)

truthsetsyoufree

Thanks Clark. Good thing im here so I can fix the post and make it shorter. Ill remember the rule from now on. Ill put a few links at the end as well for people to better understand what this is all really about.

xorbie

Wow... 9th cousins. I have third cousins I've never, ever seen, ever talked to and don't even know their names. Beyond that, I have no idea how many exist. So 9th cousins just doesn't do much for me. Sorry.

Matt the Medic

It is paranoia to suggest that being 9th cousins is anything more than it is. Hardly family. Heck, Im sure a good majority of america are 50th cousins to either one of them!

We might even *shudder* share 99.99999999999999923% of the same DNA as Bush! Damn genetics!

truthsetsyoufree

Both Bill AND Hillary are related to the Queen of England, just like Bush and Kerry and they ALL are descended from Charlemagne (Charles The Great).

This bloodline also includes the Habsburgs, the most powerful family in Europe under the Holy Roman Empire; Geoffrey Plantagenet and the Plantagenet royal dynasty in England; King John, who signed the Magna Carta; King Henry Ist, II, and III, who were extremely close to the Knights Templar, as was King John;

Mary Stuart and the Stuart Dynasty, including King James Ist of England, sponsor of the King James version of the Bible; King George Ist, II, and III; Edward Ist, II, and III, Queen Victoria; Edward VII; George V and VI; Queen Elizabeth II; Prince Charles and Elizabeth's other offspring, Anne, Andrew and Edward; Princes William and Harry from Charles' "marriage" to Princess Diana;

US Presidents, George Washington, John Adams, John Quincy Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and George Bush are all named in the charts as strands of this bloodline; it was passed on to the year 2000 US presidential favorite, George W. Bush Jr., and his brother, Jeb Bush, the Governor of Florida.

In fact if you go deeply enough into the genealogical research you will find that ALL the presidents are from this line. Genealogical sources, like the New England Historical Genealogical Society and Burkes Peerage, have shown that 33 of the 42 presidents to Clinton are related to Charlemagne and 19 are related to England's Edward III, both of whom are of this bloodline.

A spokesman for Burkes Peerage, the bible of royal and aristocratic genealogy based in London, has said that every presidential election since and including George Washington in 1789 has been won by the candidate with the most royal genes. Now we can see how and why. United States presidents are not chosen by ballot, they are chosen by blood!

Chuck

I am an heir to the throne of the Polish-Lithuanian Empire (from the bloodline of 14th century Queen Jadwiga) and a moderator. I don't think I need to draw a chart for anyone to see the truth here.

truthsetsyoufree

http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3005941a12,00.html

"Every maternal blood line of Kerry makes him more royal than any previous American president," Brooks-Baker said.

"Because of the fact that every presidential candidate with the most royal genes and chromosomes has always won the November presidential election, the coming election – based on 42 previous presidents – will go to John Kerry."

maybe the sheeple will wake up and realize that their vote doesn't count. The only way Bush will stay president is if something "bad" happens to Kerry, or if there's an attack on America that postpones and cancels the election (which the govt itself has been warning us about).

Azathoth

I have a friend that's distantly related to Kaiser Wilhelm II. I routinely blame him for the First World War.

DNAinaGoodway

I heard, just last night on NPR, that some scientists, using a mathematical model, worked out that we all share a commen ancestor who lived only about 3500 years ago, and who most likely lived in southeast Asia.

Story here: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...toryId=4053179

Derec

We all? Sounds way too short, by at least one order of magnitude. How does that account for rather isolated human populations such as Australian Aborignes or American Indians? :huh:

Oh, and I can already hear the YECs: "That was Noah!"

UMoC