FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-10-2005, 06:05 AM   #111
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
Default

Quote:
rhutchin
Surely you jest. Let’s see. People build a football stadium and only let those people enter who buy a ticket. You then accuse the owners of torturing those people who do not buy a ticket because the owners do not let them watch the game. How do you come up with this logic??

David Vestal
To complete the analogy, suppose the owners then set on fire everyone who didn't buy a ticket--precisely as god does. If the owners did that, they'd be guilty of torture, just as god is.
Nope. God does not set people on fire. Hell is simply the opposite of heaven. Your contention seems to be that the owners of the football stadium are obligated to, perhaps, provide peanuts and beer as well as a 100 foot screen for people who refuse to purchase a ticket so that they can watch the game also.
rhutchin is offline  
Old 11-10-2005, 06:11 AM   #112
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
Default

Quote:
rhutchin
As I understand the verse, that which God said was that death would be certain but not necessarily immediate (although the process of death began at that time). The fruit of the tree was not poisonous as to cause immediate death (since everything God had created was good).

God did not lie as far as I can tell, notwithstanding your efforts to show otherwise.

Jack the Bodiless
...Then I suggest you re-read the relevant verses. God said that death would ensue on the day that the fruit is eaten: it would be toxic within hours, at most.

Quote:
Genesis 2:17
But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
Previous thread on this: Adam and Eve: there was no "spiritual death"
I think the only way to begin to resolve this is for someone who knows Hebrew (the ancient Hebrew in which Genesis is written) to weigh in and explain the translation.

My understanding is that the translation of the text is difficult but that it does not mean that death would ensue on the day that the fruit was eaten (i.e., it does mean that A/E would drop dead on the spot).
rhutchin is offline  
Old 11-10-2005, 06:24 AM   #113
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Republic and Canton of Geneva
Posts: 5,756
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin
You are quibbling over nothing. The point here is that one must obtain a “ticket� (forgiveness for sin) in order to get into heaven. Otherwise, one resides outside (in hell). God is not responsible for people who refuse to take a ticket when offered (even when the ticket is essentially free).
But god is responsible for hell existing, and for what will happen to them in hell, isn't he?

Plus, you seem to be changing your theological horse in mid-race. I thought you held that the 'god of this world' had blinded their eyes so that they could see no tickets being offered (atheists) and/or told them that the match was in a different stadium and on a different day (followers of false religions).

I didn't think you believed that those whom god had chosen to be blinded by the 'god of this world' had any choice in the matter. But now you're suggesting that they refused to take a ticket when it was offered.

Can you kindly clarify your position Rhutchin?

Thanks in advance.
post tenebras lux is offline  
Old 11-10-2005, 06:49 AM   #114
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin
The Jews were slave labor for Pharaoh. It seems reasonable that he would not want them to leave. When God relaxed His grip on Pharaoh, Pharaoh sought to keep the Jews from leaving.

Pharaoh could have chosen otherwise had he desired so. He was constrained by his selfish desires (as all people are).

Under free will, a person chooses his own path. God does not choose that path for the person. God can intervene and influence some people to go in a different direction (which He does for the elect). People are free to do as they desire otherwise.
So god can suspend a person's free will whenever god so chooses.

Is that what you are saying?
John A. Broussard is offline  
Old 11-10-2005, 06:51 AM   #115
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin
If you are talking about libertarian free will,
Please explain what you mean by libertarian free will.

Thank you.
John A. Broussard is offline  
Old 11-10-2005, 06:53 AM   #116
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin
Nope. God does not set people on fire. Hell is simply the opposite of heaven. Your contention seems to be that the owners of the football stadium are obligated to, perhaps, provide peanuts and beer as well as a 100 foot screen for people who refuse to purchase a ticket so that they can watch the game also.
So the divinely inspired writers who wrote about hell flames were simply lying.

Is that correct?
John A. Broussard is offline  
Old 11-10-2005, 06:56 AM   #117
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin
I think the only way to begin to resolve this is for someone who knows Hebrew (the ancient Hebrew in which Genesis is written) to weigh in and explain the translation.

My understanding is that the translation of the text is difficult but that it does not mean that death would ensue on the day that the fruit was eaten (i.e., it does mean that A/E would drop dead on the spot).
Are you saying that the current translations may be inaccurate? Aren't they the divinely inspired words of god which guided believers throughout the world?

Please explain. You seem to be casting terrible doubts upon your sacred writings this morning.

Thank you.
John A. Broussard is offline  
Old 11-10-2005, 07:37 AM   #118
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
Default

Quote:
rhutchin
You are quibbling over nothing. The point here is that one must obtain a “ticket� (forgiveness for sin) in order to get into heaven. Otherwise, one resides outside (in hell). God is not responsible for people who refuse to take a ticket when offered (even when the ticket is essentially free).

post tenebras lux
But god is responsible for hell existing, and for what will happen to them in hell, isn't he?

Plus, you seem to be changing your theological horse in mid-race. I thought you held that the 'god of this world' had blinded their eyes so that they could see no tickets being offered (atheists) and/or told them that the match was in a different stadium and on a different day (followers of false religions).

I didn't think you believed that those whom god had chosen to be blinded by the 'god of this world' had any choice in the matter. But now you're suggesting that they refused to take a ticket when it was offered.
God is responsible for hell existing in the sense that hell cannot exist unless heaven exists, and God has set aside one area for heaven and one area for hell.

Being blinded by the god of this world can entail many things. Use an atheist as an example. Many in this forum have a fairly decent knowledge of the Bible and salvation. The reaction of such atheists to the Bible and salvation would be that which we would expect from one who has been blinded. Such atheists seem to understand their situation (as described by the Bible). They see the ticket offered to them but reject it. If you tell an atheist that his inability to respond positively to the gospel is a consequence of his being blinded by the god of this world, he laughs. Look at it from your perspective (given that you are an atheist).
rhutchin is offline  
Old 11-10-2005, 07:44 AM   #119
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
Default

Quote:
rhutchin
The Jews were slave labor for Pharaoh. It seems reasonable that he would not want them to leave. When God relaxed His grip on Pharaoh, Pharaoh sought to keep the Jews from leaving.

Pharaoh could have chosen otherwise had he desired so. He was constrained by his selfish desires (as all people are).

Under free will, a person chooses his own path. God does not choose that path for the person. God can intervene and influence some people to go in a different direction (which He does for the elect). People are free to do as they desire otherwise.

John A. Broussard
So god can suspend a person's free will whenever god so chooses.

Is that what you are saying?
I am not sure how you mean that God suspends a person’s free will in the above cases. Pharaoh was free to act consistent with his desires (although God could have restricted Pharaoh’s actions). Sorta like putting a dog in a fenced yard. The dog is free to do anything it wants within the yard but cannot do anything outside the yard. As an example, you are free to pretty much do anything you want as limited by your physical and fiscal abilities.
rhutchin is offline  
Old 11-10-2005, 07:47 AM   #120
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John A. Broussard
Please explain what you mean by libertarian free will.

Thank you.
Try this--

http://www.theopedia.com/Libertarian_free_will
rhutchin is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:29 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.