FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-21-2003, 08:43 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,612
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by spin
Grin. I'll debate anyone on the subject. Try to get someone who knows his stuff to take the Essene position up.
I'm rather busy for the next few days, but once I have some time I'll take you up on that, with two provisos.

1) I won't argue the standard Essene Hypothesis, because I'm persuaded that it's probably incorrect. Rather I'll follow the lead of Martinez et al.--the so-called "Groningen Hypothesis"--and argue that those at Qumran represent a splinter from mainstream Essenism. That, in short, we can identify Qumran by the Essenes, but not the Essenes by Qumran.

2) You're not just going to try and falsify my position, but are also going to present an alternative model of Scrolls origin. It would be helpful to know what that model will be in advance.

It's not enough to simply say "These are the problems with an Essene identification,"--I know there are problems. I accept it because it's the best fit. To falsify that, you need to illustrate a better fit.

Regards,
Rick
Rick Sumner is offline  
Old 11-21-2003, 09:10 AM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Rick Sumner
I'm rather busy for the next few days, but once I have some time I'll take you up on that, with two provisos.

1) I won't argue the standard Essene Hypothesis, because I'm persuaded that it's probably incorrect. Rather I'll follow the lead of Martinez et al.--the so-called "Groningen Hypothesis"--and argue that those at Qumran represent a splinter from mainstream Essenism. That, in short, we can identify Qumran by the Essenes, but not the Essenes by Qumran.

2) You're not just going to try and falsify my position, but are also going to present an alternative model of Scrolls origin. It would be helpful to know what that model will be in advance.

It's not enough to simply say "These are the problems with an Essene identification,"--I know there are problems. I accept it because it's the best fit. To falsify that, you need to illustrate a better fit.

Regards,
Rick
This is like the drug addict who won't get off his nicotine habit unless he has something better to put into himself. The replacement theory is not useful to anyone. If something is shown to be wrong, it is wrong. You don't need to replace it with something else. Remeber the Michelson-Morley experiment to find the ether between planets and stars? The scientists concluded that their idea was correct despite the fact that their experiment was a failure. It took Einstein many years later to say that the experiment was a success and that ether was bollox.

To falsify anyone's Essene scrolls relationship, all I have to do is show that it is wrong. I will offer an alternative only after showing that the Essene stuff is wrong. The alternative however does involve not retrojecting Pharisaic ideas of the Jewish religion into the analysis.

I will have to do it all from memory as I have been doing here so far, for all my books (except the first volume of the Martinez and Tigchelaar translation with text) are on another continent.

And try not to wear Josephus out on the Essenes. Remember his audience and what they knew of Greek schools. Which Greek school do the Essenes best fit?

It's up to you.


spin
spin is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:22 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.