FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

View Poll Results: Which of the following do you consider fiction?
Philosophy 0 0%
Personal advice 0 0%
A set of laws 0 0%
A parable 21 70.00%
A text meant to manipulate people 7 23.33%
A political statement in the form of a prophecy 11 36.67%
A composite person based on a collection of traditions 19 63.33%
A story for entertainment purposes 24 80.00%
A letter of edification written under another's name 6 20.00%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-20-2006, 10:01 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: earth
Posts: 3,946
Default

Fiction is a story told well, and non-fiction is a story told poorly.
abaddon is offline  
Old 11-20-2006, 10:18 PM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Llyricist View Post
Well my understanding of the term in its most general sense would be along the lines of: "a narrative which does not correspond with reality".
If the exodus was based on the expulsion of the Hyksos from Egypt, should it be considered fiction or not? How meaningful would it be to call it fiction if the receivers of the tradition are not aware that it fits the category -- according to your understanding?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Llyricist
And frankly, I would say that all the narratives belonging to the genres mentioned above contain elements that would would fit that definition as well as elements that do not.
So we can happily make a distinction within a text which involves some elements being fictional, while others not?

Once the word "fiction" has been painted on a narrative, I frequently note that the text, in the eyes of the painter, loses its ability to be of use.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Llyricist
Then there are more specialized definitions which actually do depend on the intent of the promulgator of the narrative. Such as the whole genre labeled fiction, or the parable which is intended to be taken as fiction for illustration purposes, even though the correspondence to reality may be close to 1 to 1.
How can one divine the intent of the promulgator when the text may have passed through five sets of hands before becoming fossilized?


spin
spin is offline  
Old 11-20-2006, 11:17 PM   #13
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Let's beat about the implications of labelling something as fiction.
OK, use the TF. Is it an historical comment by Josephus,
or a fictional interpolation by a later scribe?
mountainman is offline  
Old 11-20-2006, 11:23 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 3,382
Default

It's a nice way of saying "lie"
purple_kathryn is offline  
Old 11-21-2006, 12:02 AM   #15
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

"Invention is more useful than truth"
---------- Mussolini

"The only thing new in the world is history you dont know"
---------- Harry S Truman.
mountainman is offline  
Old 11-21-2006, 12:10 AM   #16
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by purple_kathryn View Post
It's a nice way of saying "lie"
I do think a number of people who use the term actually mean "lie", but where's the lie in a parable? Where's the lie in a tradition based on history, yet has changed in transmission?


spin
spin is offline  
Old 11-21-2006, 01:28 AM   #17
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
I do think a number of people who use the term actually mean "lie", but where's the lie in a parable? Where's the lie in a tradition based on history, yet has changed in transmission?
IMO, there is no "lie" in a parable, because a parable by definition
is something which is known to "honestly" attempt the representation
of something else in another form.

However, there can be misrepresentation in asserting the source
of a parable to one figure, when the parable was extant before
that figure was purportedly born.

The stronger "lie" is in the fraudulent misrepresentation of historical
data, and in the fraudulent misrepresention of authorship, such as
the state of affairs IF Eusebius interpolated Tertullion,
for example, or Hegesippus, or Josephus, etc.




Pete
mountainman is offline  
Old 11-21-2006, 04:01 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 4,287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by purple_kathryn View Post
It's a nice way of saying "lie"
I wish people would just say 'lie' if that's what they mean. Fiction isn't about lies, it's simply about not being factual. Fiction can convey truths and meaning as well as facts can. Plato's socratic dialogues were fiction. Were they also lies?
WishboneDawn is offline  
Old 11-21-2006, 04:33 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Darwin, Australia
Posts: 874
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
I'm happy to accept the possibility that the question is poorly framed, but as I stated in the OP I'm interested in understanding how we use the term "fiction" and you haven't helped yet. You've merely assumed the notion. Can you get further into it? Remember for example we often counterpoint truth and fiction, so for some truth cannot be fiction, though this is not the case for you, it seems.

Philosophy is sometimes presented as a dialogue in which different philosophical views are confronted in some situation, yet no-one here has yet indicated that philosophy can be fiction. Personal advice can be given in the form of a story or a parable, yet no-one called it fiction.


spin
This may not be the most useful comment in the context of the broader intent of this discussion, but I wonder if better progress in what is technically an analytic philosophy question would be accomplished by sharing it with the Philosophy section of iidb. I have never ventured into that group on iidb but would like to imagine there a higher chance of analyzing the word without the emotionally charged triggers it touches here. (Then once all enlightened and expert on the various notions of 'fiction' through the discipline of analytic philosophy we can all return and apply the word more knowledgably to our scriptural and historical debates! )
neilgodfrey is offline  
Old 11-21-2006, 04:36 AM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 3,382
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WishboneDawn View Post
I wish people would just say 'lie' if that's what they mean. Fiction isn't about lies, it's simply about not being factual. Fiction can convey truths and meaning as well as facts can. Plato's socratic dialogues were fiction. Were they also lies?
Words can have more than one definition.

If someone wants to convey that they believe that something is a fabrication but don't want to come across as overly confrontational I don't see why it wouldn't be acceptable to use "fiction" instead.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fiction

One of the definitions given in the above link

Quote:
Law. Something untrue that is intentionally represented as true by the narrator.
purple_kathryn is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:17 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.