FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-09-2007, 09:00 AM   #91
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nazaroo View Post
Seriosly, Roger, is there no papyrus left in lower Egypt? can you confirm that?
Not a lot, apparently. But I've not done a plant-by-plant search...

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 05-09-2007, 09:28 AM   #92
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Allen, Tx
Posts: 604
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darstec View Post
An empty tomb yet they know it is his rather than another family member's or dignitary's?
Could it be anyone's tomb? No. It would have to have been someone of great wealth and authority.

Why Herod? Because Herod built the Herodium as a fortress complete with tomb, so say the source(s?). The lower palace was said to have been created specifically for his funeral, complete with a long processional "way". At the end of it, a turn is made and an ascent by stone steps to the tomb podium on the side of the hill about 3/4 of the way up (it appears...). It looks to me like Herod was copying the Egyptian Pharoahs and their pyramids, in his own fashion of course.

Again, why Herod? Who else would have had the money or authority to build such things and on "his property"?

It is most likely Herod's tomb. It will be interesting to see if they come up with any inscriptions and in what language(s).
Riverwind is offline  
Old 05-09-2007, 09:36 AM   #93
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

This just in: They found a mosaic depicting a giant star, being followed by three men on camels, and another one depicting the killing of hundreds of babies!

An inscription reads:

"As my final act, I tried to have the Messiah killed, but alas I failed"
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 05-09-2007, 09:56 AM   #94
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachi151 View Post
Don't know, I've just heard several times that prior to the finding of the inscription that "some scholars" doubted the existence of Pilate. This may well have been another Christian foil for all I know, but I've heard the claim several times.

IIUC and IMS the (limited) truth behind this is that it was at one time suggested that early on a fictitious character called Pilate became part of the Jesus story on the basis of Jesus being pierced with a spear (Pilum). The Pilate in the Gospels was supposedly based on confusion between this Pilate and the historical Roman Governor.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 05-09-2007, 10:08 AM   #95
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachi151 View Post
Don't know, I've just heard several times that prior to the finding of the inscription that "some scholars" doubted the existence of Pilate. This may well have been another Christian foil for all I know, but I've heard the claim several times.

BTW:

http://www.catholic.org/internationa...y.php?id=24029

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/...cle2524437.ece
We have an entire thread here: Did any skeptic think Pilate a myth? devoted to debunking that old apologist's tale.
Toto is offline  
Old 05-09-2007, 01:52 PM   #96
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 10,955
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cege View Post
There doesn't seem to be evidence that Herod was inside the tomb, since there are no bones and nothing that Josephus described as what Herod was wearing when buried (purple cloth, diadem, crown, etc).

The assumption thus far is that Herod must have been buried inside the 8-foot tomb after his death but marauding zealots later broke inside, broke apart whatever was in there, and removed bones, diadem, etc.

Can archeology do better right now than assert that it's the tomb of Herod because it's in the right place to be so, even if physical evidence is missing?

It would be nice to have the body, but I don't know if it would add much to the debate. We can't compare DNA, so it would just be a body. The clothes would be probative, but then, what important person is not buried in expensive clothes, and purple is the traditional color of royalty.

My point is the body or lack thereof would probably tell us little about whether the owner of the tomb was in fact Herod. Hopefully, they have some other method for establishing that. I think the fact that this appears to be the main tomb in a structure traditionally held to be Herod's fortress/palace is pretty dispositive on the issue.
Gamera is offline  
Old 05-09-2007, 01:54 PM   #97
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 10,955
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EthnAlln View Post
Terrific! After 2000 years in his grave Herod may manage to inspire yet another massacre.
A tragic observation.
Gamera is offline  
Old 05-09-2007, 02:49 PM   #98
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamera View Post
It would be nice to have the body, but I don't know if it would add much to the debate. We can't compare DNA, so it would just be a body. The clothes would be probative, but then, what important person is not buried in expensive clothes, and purple is the traditional color of royalty.

My point is the body or lack thereof would probably tell us little about whether the owner of the tomb was in fact Herod. Hopefully, they have some other method for establishing that. I think the fact that this appears to be the main tomb in a structure traditionally held to be Herod's fortress/palace is pretty dispositive on the issue.

Actually there is a bust of Herod that is from the 1st century BCE, so one could do a reconstruction of the head, to compare. Also the age of the person can be guesstimated by the bones, which could exclude Herod, as well as the sex.
yummyfur is offline  
Old 05-09-2007, 03:06 PM   #99
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

The LA Times had a front page article this morning Israeli archeologist driven to find king's tomb: Ehud Netzer searched for 35 years before locating what he is certain is the grave of Herod the Great.

There is a video on the website and a photo gallery.
Toto is offline  
Old 05-09-2007, 03:20 PM   #100
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bong Hits 4 Jesus. KY
Posts: 643
Default

Suck on that, indeed, skeptics of Jes--- er, Herod!
Ruiner is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:21 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.