FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-31-2006, 02:26 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Nazareth
Posts: 2,357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JW
[Does it matter?]
Quote:
Originally Posted by jgibson000 View Post
You are in the process of something, that's for certain. But geeze, Jospeh. How can you "rip" someone, even assuming you have the capabilities of doing so, when there's not a shred of evidence that you've ever grasped what he has said or understood what the issues are that he's raised?
JW:
For my Protis response Jeff you can either remain here indefinitely or until Jesus shows up, whichever comes first, until you answer the question:

"How do you keep a Polish Christian familiar in suspense?"

Or you can share some of that swell Greek in your head here:

WhoSonfirst? Anti-Separationist Corruption In The First Gospel

and here:

Mark 16--who's studied this?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff
may I ask if have you stopped beating your wife yet?
JW:
I don't beat my wife Jeff. She's a full professor.



Joseph

http://www.errancywiki.com/index.php/Main_Page
JoeWallack is offline  
Old 12-31-2006, 05:31 PM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by unregistered_user_1 View Post
At the Iron Chariots page. Just started, but it could eventually become useful...
Where do you see the project heading?
Where would you like to see it in 5 years?
Does the project have an agenda?
What's the summary?
mountainman is offline  
Old 12-31-2006, 06:54 PM   #13
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgibson000 View Post
Perhaps you'll be kind enough to explain to me how asking questionsabout the orientation of, and the (if any) assumptions behind, the Counter Apologetics Wiki -- which, if you'll read my post carefully, is all I did -- is tantamount to "jumping to conclusions" about these things.

If there's any "sheeshing" to be done here, it's over how you accuse me of doing something I did not do.

JG
Every last one of your questions was in the form of "Will it be bad in this way? Will it be bad in that way?" Also, you strictly speaking did more than ask questions, you made two indicitive statements: "Could be useless except to those who already have their minds made up.." and "many here on IIDB" "work from the apriori... not only that all who mount a defense of religious claims, or of the HJ, are 'apologists', but that nothing put forward by an "apologist" can be anything but misinformed and logically fallacious?" The clear implication of all this is that this is how the wiki would very likely, if not certainly, turn out.

Again, if you're concerned about quality, pitch in rather than fighting silly arguments like this one.
hallq is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:10 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.